Assessment of tidal volume and thoracoabdominal motion using volume and flow-oriented incentive spirometers in healthy subjects

The objective of the present study was to evaluate incentive spirometers using volume- (Coach and Voldyne) and flow-oriented (Triflo II and Respirex) devices. Sixteen healthy subjects, 24 ± 4 years, 62 ± 12 kg, were studied. Respiratory variables were obtained by respiratory inductive plethysmograph...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: V.F. Parreira, G.M. Tomich, R.R. Britto, R.F. Sampaio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica 2005-07-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2005000700014
_version_ 1811217003570003968
author V.F. Parreira
G.M. Tomich
R.R. Britto
R.F. Sampaio
author_facet V.F. Parreira
G.M. Tomich
R.R. Britto
R.F. Sampaio
author_sort V.F. Parreira
collection DOAJ
description The objective of the present study was to evaluate incentive spirometers using volume- (Coach and Voldyne) and flow-oriented (Triflo II and Respirex) devices. Sixteen healthy subjects, 24 ± 4 years, 62 ± 12 kg, were studied. Respiratory variables were obtained by respiratory inductive plethysmography, with subjects in a semi-reclined position (45º). Tidal volume, respiratory frequency, minute ventilation, inspiratory duty cycle, mean inspiratory flow, and thoracoabdominal motion were measured. Statistical analysis was performed with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, t-test and ANOVA. Comparison between the Coach and Voldyne devices showed that larger values of tidal volume (1035 ± 268 vs 947 ± 268 ml, P = 0.02) and minute ventilation (9.07 ± 3.61 vs 7.49 ± 2.58 l/min, P = 0.01) were reached with Voldyne, whereas no significant differences in respiratory frequency were observed (7.85 ± 1.24 vs 8.57 ± 1.89 bpm). Comparison between flow-oriented devices showed larger values of inspiratory duty cycle and lower mean inspiratory flow with Triflo II (0.35 ± 0.05 vs 0.32 ± 0.05 ml/s, P = 0.00, and 531 ± 137 vs 606 ± 167 ml/s, P = 0.00, respectively). Abdominal motion was larger (P < 0.05) during the use of volume-oriented devices compared to flow-oriented devices (52 ± 11% for Coach and 50 ± 9% for Voldyne; 43 ± 13% for Triflo II and 44 ± 14% for Respirex). We observed that significantly higher tidal volume associated with low respiratory frequency was reached with Voldyne, and that there was a larger abdominal displacement with volume-oriented devices.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T06:46:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3430a44eebaf4d1fb42987e52bc55eac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0100-879X
1414-431X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T06:46:42Z
publishDate 2005-07-01
publisher Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
spelling doaj.art-3430a44eebaf4d1fb42987e52bc55eac2022-12-22T03:43:30ZengAssociação Brasileira de Divulgação CientíficaBrazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research0100-879X1414-431X2005-07-013871105111210.1590/S0100-879X2005000700014Assessment of tidal volume and thoracoabdominal motion using volume and flow-oriented incentive spirometers in healthy subjectsV.F. ParreiraG.M. TomichR.R. BrittoR.F. SampaioThe objective of the present study was to evaluate incentive spirometers using volume- (Coach and Voldyne) and flow-oriented (Triflo II and Respirex) devices. Sixteen healthy subjects, 24 ± 4 years, 62 ± 12 kg, were studied. Respiratory variables were obtained by respiratory inductive plethysmography, with subjects in a semi-reclined position (45º). Tidal volume, respiratory frequency, minute ventilation, inspiratory duty cycle, mean inspiratory flow, and thoracoabdominal motion were measured. Statistical analysis was performed with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, t-test and ANOVA. Comparison between the Coach and Voldyne devices showed that larger values of tidal volume (1035 ± 268 vs 947 ± 268 ml, P = 0.02) and minute ventilation (9.07 ± 3.61 vs 7.49 ± 2.58 l/min, P = 0.01) were reached with Voldyne, whereas no significant differences in respiratory frequency were observed (7.85 ± 1.24 vs 8.57 ± 1.89 bpm). Comparison between flow-oriented devices showed larger values of inspiratory duty cycle and lower mean inspiratory flow with Triflo II (0.35 ± 0.05 vs 0.32 ± 0.05 ml/s, P = 0.00, and 531 ± 137 vs 606 ± 167 ml/s, P = 0.00, respectively). Abdominal motion was larger (P < 0.05) during the use of volume-oriented devices compared to flow-oriented devices (52 ± 11% for Coach and 50 ± 9% for Voldyne; 43 ± 13% for Triflo II and 44 ± 14% for Respirex). We observed that significantly higher tidal volume associated with low respiratory frequency was reached with Voldyne, and that there was a larger abdominal displacement with volume-oriented devices.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2005000700014Incentive spirometryRespiratory inductive plethysmographyPhysiotherapyVolume-oriented spirometerFlow-oriented spirometer
spellingShingle V.F. Parreira
G.M. Tomich
R.R. Britto
R.F. Sampaio
Assessment of tidal volume and thoracoabdominal motion using volume and flow-oriented incentive spirometers in healthy subjects
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Incentive spirometry
Respiratory inductive plethysmography
Physiotherapy
Volume-oriented spirometer
Flow-oriented spirometer
title Assessment of tidal volume and thoracoabdominal motion using volume and flow-oriented incentive spirometers in healthy subjects
title_full Assessment of tidal volume and thoracoabdominal motion using volume and flow-oriented incentive spirometers in healthy subjects
title_fullStr Assessment of tidal volume and thoracoabdominal motion using volume and flow-oriented incentive spirometers in healthy subjects
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of tidal volume and thoracoabdominal motion using volume and flow-oriented incentive spirometers in healthy subjects
title_short Assessment of tidal volume and thoracoabdominal motion using volume and flow-oriented incentive spirometers in healthy subjects
title_sort assessment of tidal volume and thoracoabdominal motion using volume and flow oriented incentive spirometers in healthy subjects
topic Incentive spirometry
Respiratory inductive plethysmography
Physiotherapy
Volume-oriented spirometer
Flow-oriented spirometer
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2005000700014
work_keys_str_mv AT vfparreira assessmentoftidalvolumeandthoracoabdominalmotionusingvolumeandfloworientedincentivespirometersinhealthysubjects
AT gmtomich assessmentoftidalvolumeandthoracoabdominalmotionusingvolumeandfloworientedincentivespirometersinhealthysubjects
AT rrbritto assessmentoftidalvolumeandthoracoabdominalmotionusingvolumeandfloworientedincentivespirometersinhealthysubjects
AT rfsampaio assessmentoftidalvolumeandthoracoabdominalmotionusingvolumeandfloworientedincentivespirometersinhealthysubjects