Can Frailty Be a Predictor of ICD Shock after the Implantation of a Cardioverter Defibrillator in Elderly Patients?
Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of frailty among elderly patients who had an implanted cardioverter defibrillator, as well as the influence of frailty on the main endpoints during the follow-up. Methods: The study included 103 patients > 60 years of age (85M, aged...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-09-01
|
| Series: | Sensors |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/18/6299 |
| _version_ | 1827681231940091904 |
|---|---|
| author | Agnieszka Mlynarska Rafal Mlynarski Bartosz Uchmanowicz Wioletta Mikuľáková |
| author_facet | Agnieszka Mlynarska Rafal Mlynarski Bartosz Uchmanowicz Wioletta Mikuľáková |
| author_sort | Agnieszka Mlynarska |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of frailty among elderly patients who had an implanted cardioverter defibrillator, as well as the influence of frailty on the main endpoints during the follow-up. Methods: The study included 103 patients > 60 years of age (85M, aged 71.56–8.17 years). All of the patients had an implanted single or dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillator. In the research, there was a 12-month follow-up. The occurrence of frailty syndrome was assessed using the Tilburg Frailty Indicator scale (TFI). Results: Frailty syndrome was diagnosed in 75.73% of the patients that were included in the study. The mean values of the TFI were 6.55 ± 2.67, in the physical domain 4.06 ± 1.79, in the psychological domain 2.06 ± 1.10, and in the social domain 0.44 ± 0.55. During the follow-up period, 27.2% of patients had a defibrillator cardioverter electric shock, which occurred statistically more often in patients with diagnosed frailty syndrome (34.6%) compared to the robust patients (4%); <i>p</i> = 0.0062. In the logistic regression, frailty (OR: 1.203, 95% CI:1.0126–1.4298; <i>p</i> < 0.030) was an independent predictor of a defibrillator cardioverter electric shock. Similarly, in the logistic regression, frailty (OR: 1.3623, 95% CI:1.0290–1.8035; <i>p</i> = 0.019) was also an independent predictor for inadequate electric shocks. Conclusion: About three-quarters of the elderly patients that had qualified for ICD implantation were affected by frailty syndrome. In the frailty subgroup, adequate and inadequate shocks occurred more often compared to the robust patients. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T07:13:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-3435fd647360418cac5c3f9bcc87dae7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1424-8220 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T07:13:18Z |
| publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Sensors |
| spelling | doaj.art-3435fd647360418cac5c3f9bcc87dae72023-11-22T15:14:43ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-09-012118629910.3390/s21186299Can Frailty Be a Predictor of ICD Shock after the Implantation of a Cardioverter Defibrillator in Elderly Patients?Agnieszka Mlynarska0Rafal Mlynarski1Bartosz Uchmanowicz2Wioletta Mikuľáková3Department of Gerontology and Geriatric Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, 40-635 Katowice, PolandUpper Silesian Heart Centre, Department of Electrocardiology, 40-055 Katowice, PolandDepartment of Clinical Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, 51-618 Wroclaw, PolandDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Care, University of Presov, Partizánska 1, 08001 Presov, SlovakiaIntroduction: The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of frailty among elderly patients who had an implanted cardioverter defibrillator, as well as the influence of frailty on the main endpoints during the follow-up. Methods: The study included 103 patients > 60 years of age (85M, aged 71.56–8.17 years). All of the patients had an implanted single or dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillator. In the research, there was a 12-month follow-up. The occurrence of frailty syndrome was assessed using the Tilburg Frailty Indicator scale (TFI). Results: Frailty syndrome was diagnosed in 75.73% of the patients that were included in the study. The mean values of the TFI were 6.55 ± 2.67, in the physical domain 4.06 ± 1.79, in the psychological domain 2.06 ± 1.10, and in the social domain 0.44 ± 0.55. During the follow-up period, 27.2% of patients had a defibrillator cardioverter electric shock, which occurred statistically more often in patients with diagnosed frailty syndrome (34.6%) compared to the robust patients (4%); <i>p</i> = 0.0062. In the logistic regression, frailty (OR: 1.203, 95% CI:1.0126–1.4298; <i>p</i> < 0.030) was an independent predictor of a defibrillator cardioverter electric shock. Similarly, in the logistic regression, frailty (OR: 1.3623, 95% CI:1.0290–1.8035; <i>p</i> = 0.019) was also an independent predictor for inadequate electric shocks. Conclusion: About three-quarters of the elderly patients that had qualified for ICD implantation were affected by frailty syndrome. In the frailty subgroup, adequate and inadequate shocks occurred more often compared to the robust patients.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/18/6299frailtyimplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorelectric shockinadequate electric shocks |
| spellingShingle | Agnieszka Mlynarska Rafal Mlynarski Bartosz Uchmanowicz Wioletta Mikuľáková Can Frailty Be a Predictor of ICD Shock after the Implantation of a Cardioverter Defibrillator in Elderly Patients? Sensors frailty implantable cardioverter-defibrillator electric shock inadequate electric shocks |
| title | Can Frailty Be a Predictor of ICD Shock after the Implantation of a Cardioverter Defibrillator in Elderly Patients? |
| title_full | Can Frailty Be a Predictor of ICD Shock after the Implantation of a Cardioverter Defibrillator in Elderly Patients? |
| title_fullStr | Can Frailty Be a Predictor of ICD Shock after the Implantation of a Cardioverter Defibrillator in Elderly Patients? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Can Frailty Be a Predictor of ICD Shock after the Implantation of a Cardioverter Defibrillator in Elderly Patients? |
| title_short | Can Frailty Be a Predictor of ICD Shock after the Implantation of a Cardioverter Defibrillator in Elderly Patients? |
| title_sort | can frailty be a predictor of icd shock after the implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator in elderly patients |
| topic | frailty implantable cardioverter-defibrillator electric shock inadequate electric shocks |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/18/6299 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT agnieszkamlynarska canfrailtybeapredictoroficdshockaftertheimplantationofacardioverterdefibrillatorinelderlypatients AT rafalmlynarski canfrailtybeapredictoroficdshockaftertheimplantationofacardioverterdefibrillatorinelderlypatients AT bartoszuchmanowicz canfrailtybeapredictoroficdshockaftertheimplantationofacardioverterdefibrillatorinelderlypatients AT wiolettamikulakova canfrailtybeapredictoroficdshockaftertheimplantationofacardioverterdefibrillatorinelderlypatients |