The Zygomatic Anatomy-Guided Approach, Zygomatic Orbital Floor Classification, and ORIS Criteria—A 10-Year Follow-Up
Background: Presently, the management of patients with maxilla bone defects of the Cawood V or VI class is achieved using zygomatic or individual implants or through augmentation of the bone. For zygomatic implants, the ORIS criteria represent the most common factor in helping practitioners register...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/20/6681 |
| _version_ | 1797573445824806912 |
|---|---|
| author | Rafal Zielinski Jakub Okulski Wojciech Simka Marcin Kozakiewicz |
| author_facet | Rafal Zielinski Jakub Okulski Wojciech Simka Marcin Kozakiewicz |
| author_sort | Rafal Zielinski |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Presently, the management of patients with maxilla bone defects of the Cawood V or VI class is achieved using zygomatic or individual implants or through augmentation of the bone. For zygomatic implants, the ORIS criteria represent the most common factor in helping practitioners register success rates. The zygomatic anatomy-guided approach (ZAGA)and zygomatic orbital floor (ZOF) are factors that are crucial to examining the anatomy of a particular patient before the procedure. The aim of thisarticle is to find the statistical relationship between the abovementioned terms and other factors. Methods: A total of 81 patients underwent zygomatic implant procedures in different configurations. The ORIS, ZAGA, and ZOF parameters were compared with other factors such as type of surgery, sex, age, and the anatomy of the zygomatic bone. Results: Most patients in this article were classified as ZAGA Class 2. The relationships between type of surgery and ZAGA classification, and ZAGA and sinus/maxilla zygomatic implant localization were statistically significant. Conclusions: The ZAGA and ZOF scales are practical and valuable factors that should be taken into account before surgery, whereas to date, criteria better than the ORIS scale have not been described in terms of the success of zygomatic implants. The ZOF scale might omit perforation of the orbit because this parameter warns a practitioner to be aware of the anatomy of the orbit. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T21:09:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-343d3112be45491f949fdabebc71bfc0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2077-0383 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T21:09:39Z |
| publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
| spelling | doaj.art-343d3112be45491f949fdabebc71bfc02023-11-19T16:54:34ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-10-011220668110.3390/jcm12206681The Zygomatic Anatomy-Guided Approach, Zygomatic Orbital Floor Classification, and ORIS Criteria—A 10-Year Follow-UpRafal Zielinski0Jakub Okulski1Wojciech Simka2Marcin Kozakiewicz3Stomatologia na Ksiezym Mlynie, 16D Tymienieckiego, 90-365 Lodz, PolandDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, 113st Zeromskiego, 90-001 Lodz, PolandFaculty of Chemistry, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, PolandDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Lodz, 113st Zeromskiego, 90-001 Lodz, PolandBackground: Presently, the management of patients with maxilla bone defects of the Cawood V or VI class is achieved using zygomatic or individual implants or through augmentation of the bone. For zygomatic implants, the ORIS criteria represent the most common factor in helping practitioners register success rates. The zygomatic anatomy-guided approach (ZAGA)and zygomatic orbital floor (ZOF) are factors that are crucial to examining the anatomy of a particular patient before the procedure. The aim of thisarticle is to find the statistical relationship between the abovementioned terms and other factors. Methods: A total of 81 patients underwent zygomatic implant procedures in different configurations. The ORIS, ZAGA, and ZOF parameters were compared with other factors such as type of surgery, sex, age, and the anatomy of the zygomatic bone. Results: Most patients in this article were classified as ZAGA Class 2. The relationships between type of surgery and ZAGA classification, and ZAGA and sinus/maxilla zygomatic implant localization were statistically significant. Conclusions: The ZAGA and ZOF scales are practical and valuable factors that should be taken into account before surgery, whereas to date, criteria better than the ORIS scale have not been described in terms of the success of zygomatic implants. The ZOF scale might omit perforation of the orbit because this parameter warns a practitioner to be aware of the anatomy of the orbit.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/20/6681zygomatic implantsZOF classificationORIS criteriaZAGA classification |
| spellingShingle | Rafal Zielinski Jakub Okulski Wojciech Simka Marcin Kozakiewicz The Zygomatic Anatomy-Guided Approach, Zygomatic Orbital Floor Classification, and ORIS Criteria—A 10-Year Follow-Up Journal of Clinical Medicine zygomatic implants ZOF classification ORIS criteria ZAGA classification |
| title | The Zygomatic Anatomy-Guided Approach, Zygomatic Orbital Floor Classification, and ORIS Criteria—A 10-Year Follow-Up |
| title_full | The Zygomatic Anatomy-Guided Approach, Zygomatic Orbital Floor Classification, and ORIS Criteria—A 10-Year Follow-Up |
| title_fullStr | The Zygomatic Anatomy-Guided Approach, Zygomatic Orbital Floor Classification, and ORIS Criteria—A 10-Year Follow-Up |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Zygomatic Anatomy-Guided Approach, Zygomatic Orbital Floor Classification, and ORIS Criteria—A 10-Year Follow-Up |
| title_short | The Zygomatic Anatomy-Guided Approach, Zygomatic Orbital Floor Classification, and ORIS Criteria—A 10-Year Follow-Up |
| title_sort | zygomatic anatomy guided approach zygomatic orbital floor classification and oris criteria a 10 year follow up |
| topic | zygomatic implants ZOF classification ORIS criteria ZAGA classification |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/20/6681 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rafalzielinski thezygomaticanatomyguidedapproachzygomaticorbitalfloorclassificationandoriscriteriaa10yearfollowup AT jakubokulski thezygomaticanatomyguidedapproachzygomaticorbitalfloorclassificationandoriscriteriaa10yearfollowup AT wojciechsimka thezygomaticanatomyguidedapproachzygomaticorbitalfloorclassificationandoriscriteriaa10yearfollowup AT marcinkozakiewicz thezygomaticanatomyguidedapproachzygomaticorbitalfloorclassificationandoriscriteriaa10yearfollowup AT rafalzielinski zygomaticanatomyguidedapproachzygomaticorbitalfloorclassificationandoriscriteriaa10yearfollowup AT jakubokulski zygomaticanatomyguidedapproachzygomaticorbitalfloorclassificationandoriscriteriaa10yearfollowup AT wojciechsimka zygomaticanatomyguidedapproachzygomaticorbitalfloorclassificationandoriscriteriaa10yearfollowup AT marcinkozakiewicz zygomaticanatomyguidedapproachzygomaticorbitalfloorclassificationandoriscriteriaa10yearfollowup |