Energy Retrofit Optimization by Means of Genetic Algorithms as an Answer to Fuel Poverty Mitigation in Social Housing Buildings

In accordance with national regulations, the renovation of the residential sector is an urgent task for achieving significant reductions in energy consumption and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of the existing building stock. Social housing is particularly in need of such interventions, given...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adriana Ciardiello, Jacopo Dell’Olmo, Marco Ferrero, Lorenzo Mario Pastore, Federica Rosso, Ferdinando Salata
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/14/1/1
Description
Summary:In accordance with national regulations, the renovation of the residential sector is an urgent task for achieving significant reductions in energy consumption and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of the existing building stock. Social housing is particularly in need of such interventions, given the higher vulnerability of its inhabitants and its crucial role in furthering social welfare and environmental sustainability objectives. Both passive and active strategies have proved their efficacy in advancing towards these goals and also in mitigating increasing fuel poverty in low-income families. However, to optimize the best combination of such retrofit strategies, advanced optimization methodologies can be applied. Here, a multi-objective optimization methodology is implemented by a genetic algorithm (aNSGA-II) coupled to EnergyPlus dynamic energy simulations. Then, the energy consumption of the optimal solution is considered by means of EnergyPLAN simulations for the further application of active strategies. The two-step method is tested on a relevant case study, a social housing building in Rome, Italy. Results show that the applied method reduced the energy demand by 51% with passive strategies only. Active strategy implementation allowed for a further reduction of 69% in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and 51% in energy costs. The two-step method proved effective in mitigating fuel poverty and decarbonizing the residential sector.
ISSN:2073-4433