Outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with very low baseline gradients

BackgroundWhile there is evidence that patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS) benefit from transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), data are lacking regarding outcomes of patients with a very low gradient (VLG).MethodsIn this retrospective, single-center study of patients wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Faisal Rahman, Hetal H. Mehta, Jon R. Resar, Rani K. Hasan, Wendy Marconi, Hamza Aziz, Matthew J. Czarny
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1194360/full
_version_ 1797754506463674368
author Faisal Rahman
Hetal H. Mehta
Jon R. Resar
Rani K. Hasan
Wendy Marconi
Hamza Aziz
Matthew J. Czarny
author_facet Faisal Rahman
Hetal H. Mehta
Jon R. Resar
Rani K. Hasan
Wendy Marconi
Hamza Aziz
Matthew J. Czarny
author_sort Faisal Rahman
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundWhile there is evidence that patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS) benefit from transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), data are lacking regarding outcomes of patients with a very low gradient (VLG).MethodsIn this retrospective, single-center study of patients with severe AS who underwent TAVR, three groups were defined using baseline mean aortic valve gradient: VLG (≤25 mmHg), low gradient (LG, 26–39 mmHg), and high gradient (HG, ≥40 mmHg). The primary outcome was the composite of Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)-12 of <45, decrease in KCCQ-12 of ≥10 compared with baseline, or death at 1 year.ResultsOne-thousand six patients were included: 571 HG, 353 LG, and 82 VLG. The median age was 82.1 years [interquartile range (IQR) 76.3–86.9]; VLG patients had more baseline comorbidities compared with the other groups. The primary outcome was highest at 1 year in the VLG group (VLG, 46.7%; LG, 29.9%; HG, 23.1%; p = 0.002), with no difference between groups after adjustment for baseline characteristics. At baseline, <30% of VLG patients had an excellent or good (50–100) KCCQ-12, whereas more than 75% and 50% had an excellent or good KCCQ-12 at 30-day and 1-year follow-up, respectively.ConclusionAlthough patients with VLG undergoing TAVR have a higher rate of poor outcomes at 1 year compared with patients with LG and HG severe AS, this difference is largely attributable to baseline comorbidities. Patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR have significant improvement in health status outcomes regardless of resting mean gradient.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T17:34:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3444a5f482714141a0f810ed63a64586
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T17:34:24Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-3444a5f482714141a0f810ed63a645862023-08-04T12:11:25ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2023-08-011010.3389/fcvm.2023.11943601194360Outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with very low baseline gradientsFaisal Rahman0Hetal H. Mehta1Jon R. Resar2Rani K. Hasan3Wendy Marconi4Hamza Aziz5Matthew J. Czarny6Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United StatesDivision of Cardiology, Doylestown Health, Doylestown, PA, United StatesDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United StatesDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United StatesDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United StatesDivision of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United StatesDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United StatesBackgroundWhile there is evidence that patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS) benefit from transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), data are lacking regarding outcomes of patients with a very low gradient (VLG).MethodsIn this retrospective, single-center study of patients with severe AS who underwent TAVR, three groups were defined using baseline mean aortic valve gradient: VLG (≤25 mmHg), low gradient (LG, 26–39 mmHg), and high gradient (HG, ≥40 mmHg). The primary outcome was the composite of Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)-12 of <45, decrease in KCCQ-12 of ≥10 compared with baseline, or death at 1 year.ResultsOne-thousand six patients were included: 571 HG, 353 LG, and 82 VLG. The median age was 82.1 years [interquartile range (IQR) 76.3–86.9]; VLG patients had more baseline comorbidities compared with the other groups. The primary outcome was highest at 1 year in the VLG group (VLG, 46.7%; LG, 29.9%; HG, 23.1%; p = 0.002), with no difference between groups after adjustment for baseline characteristics. At baseline, <30% of VLG patients had an excellent or good (50–100) KCCQ-12, whereas more than 75% and 50% had an excellent or good KCCQ-12 at 30-day and 1-year follow-up, respectively.ConclusionAlthough patients with VLG undergoing TAVR have a higher rate of poor outcomes at 1 year compared with patients with LG and HG severe AS, this difference is largely attributable to baseline comorbidities. Patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR have significant improvement in health status outcomes regardless of resting mean gradient.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1194360/fulllow-gradient aortic stenosistranscatheter aorta valve replacementpatient outcomesquality of lifevalvular heart disease (VHD)
spellingShingle Faisal Rahman
Hetal H. Mehta
Jon R. Resar
Rani K. Hasan
Wendy Marconi
Hamza Aziz
Matthew J. Czarny
Outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with very low baseline gradients
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
low-gradient aortic stenosis
transcatheter aorta valve replacement
patient outcomes
quality of life
valvular heart disease (VHD)
title Outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with very low baseline gradients
title_full Outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with very low baseline gradients
title_fullStr Outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with very low baseline gradients
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with very low baseline gradients
title_short Outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with very low baseline gradients
title_sort outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement with very low baseline gradients
topic low-gradient aortic stenosis
transcatheter aorta valve replacement
patient outcomes
quality of life
valvular heart disease (VHD)
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1194360/full
work_keys_str_mv AT faisalrahman outcomesamongpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithverylowbaselinegradients
AT hetalhmehta outcomesamongpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithverylowbaselinegradients
AT jonrresar outcomesamongpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithverylowbaselinegradients
AT ranikhasan outcomesamongpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithverylowbaselinegradients
AT wendymarconi outcomesamongpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithverylowbaselinegradients
AT hamzaaziz outcomesamongpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithverylowbaselinegradients
AT matthewjczarny outcomesamongpatientsundergoingtranscatheteraorticvalvereplacementwithverylowbaselinegradients