The appreciation of the jurisdiction of crimes committed during commercial space flights

The author examines the jurisdictional dilemma of determining the appropriate approach to be applied to a crime that could potentially be committed during a space flight with tourists on board by assessing the place of commission of the crime. In addition, the study is based on comparisons under suc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. A. Bulgakova, V. A. Bulgakova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs 2023-06-01
Series:Право і безпека
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pb.univd.edu.ua/index.php/PB/article/view/757
_version_ 1797749901199671296
author D. A. Bulgakova
V. A. Bulgakova
author_facet D. A. Bulgakova
V. A. Bulgakova
author_sort D. A. Bulgakova
collection DOAJ
description The author examines the jurisdictional dilemma of determining the appropriate approach to be applied to a crime that could potentially be committed during a space flight with tourists on board by assessing the place of commission of the crime. In addition, the study is based on comparisons under such sources of international law as the Outer Space Treaty (OST) and the Antarctic Treaty (AT). Based on the analysis of certain articles of these documents, the authors propose to regulate commercial space flights by the example of distinguishing the “tourist element”. This approach is based on the fact that Article 8 of the Antarctic Treaty specifically refers to the tourist as a subject of liability and that a person with tourist purposes is protected by national law. Therefore, for the proper international regulation of space tourism and improvement of the Outer Space Treaty, it is recommended to legitimise tourist purposes and to distinguish the status of non-astronaut tourists in order to establish liability for certain criminal acts. To support these initiatives, two cases are cited as examples: that of astronaut Ann McClain and Dr. Rodney David Marks. Thus, the first case emphasises the restricted applicability of criminal jurisdiction on the international space station, which is usually decided by the law of the country of a person’s nationality. The second case demonstrates that although the Antarctic Treaty can serve as an example for regulating space tourism, the jurisdictional battles between states on the territory of the site of an incident with a criminal element have undermined its effectiveness. Consequently, the authors conclude that it is necessary to introduce specific international rules to regulate commercial space flights, where the aspect of jurisdiction in the investigation of a crime committed by a non-astronaut tourist should be of paramount importance. It is specified that each partner of a space flight, both the state (in the case of public interests) and/or certain flight authorities operating under the auspices of a particular country, and a space company and/or a provider of relevant services (in the case of private interests), must register a commercial space flight and its structural objects as flight elements. In this case, each of these partners retains jurisdiction and control over the registered components.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T16:25:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3448ed514997417795d78478a2907cc3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1727-1584
2617-2933
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T16:25:13Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs
record_format Article
series Право і безпека
spelling doaj.art-3448ed514997417795d78478a2907cc32023-08-08T19:45:24ZengKharkiv National University of Internal AffairsПраво і безпека1727-15842617-29332023-06-0189222723410.32631/pb.2023.2.21757The appreciation of the jurisdiction of crimes committed during commercial space flightsD. A. Bulgakova0V. A. Bulgakova1University of International Business and Economics, Beijing Gymnasium No. 91, Kryvyi Rih The author examines the jurisdictional dilemma of determining the appropriate approach to be applied to a crime that could potentially be committed during a space flight with tourists on board by assessing the place of commission of the crime. In addition, the study is based on comparisons under such sources of international law as the Outer Space Treaty (OST) and the Antarctic Treaty (AT). Based on the analysis of certain articles of these documents, the authors propose to regulate commercial space flights by the example of distinguishing the “tourist element”. This approach is based on the fact that Article 8 of the Antarctic Treaty specifically refers to the tourist as a subject of liability and that a person with tourist purposes is protected by national law. Therefore, for the proper international regulation of space tourism and improvement of the Outer Space Treaty, it is recommended to legitimise tourist purposes and to distinguish the status of non-astronaut tourists in order to establish liability for certain criminal acts. To support these initiatives, two cases are cited as examples: that of astronaut Ann McClain and Dr. Rodney David Marks. Thus, the first case emphasises the restricted applicability of criminal jurisdiction on the international space station, which is usually decided by the law of the country of a person’s nationality. The second case demonstrates that although the Antarctic Treaty can serve as an example for regulating space tourism, the jurisdictional battles between states on the territory of the site of an incident with a criminal element have undermined its effectiveness. Consequently, the authors conclude that it is necessary to introduce specific international rules to regulate commercial space flights, where the aspect of jurisdiction in the investigation of a crime committed by a non-astronaut tourist should be of paramount importance. It is specified that each partner of a space flight, both the state (in the case of public interests) and/or certain flight authorities operating under the auspices of a particular country, and a space company and/or a provider of relevant services (in the case of private interests), must register a commercial space flight and its structural objects as flight elements. In this case, each of these partners retains jurisdiction and control over the registered components.http://pb.univd.edu.ua/index.php/PB/article/view/757space tourismnon-astronaut touristouter space jurisdictionastronaut ann mcclainscientist rodney david marksouter space treatyantarctic treaty.
spellingShingle D. A. Bulgakova
V. A. Bulgakova
The appreciation of the jurisdiction of crimes committed during commercial space flights
Право і безпека
space tourism
non-astronaut tourist
outer space jurisdiction
astronaut ann mcclain
scientist rodney david marks
outer space treaty
antarctic treaty.
title The appreciation of the jurisdiction of crimes committed during commercial space flights
title_full The appreciation of the jurisdiction of crimes committed during commercial space flights
title_fullStr The appreciation of the jurisdiction of crimes committed during commercial space flights
title_full_unstemmed The appreciation of the jurisdiction of crimes committed during commercial space flights
title_short The appreciation of the jurisdiction of crimes committed during commercial space flights
title_sort appreciation of the jurisdiction of crimes committed during commercial space flights
topic space tourism
non-astronaut tourist
outer space jurisdiction
astronaut ann mcclain
scientist rodney david marks
outer space treaty
antarctic treaty.
url http://pb.univd.edu.ua/index.php/PB/article/view/757
work_keys_str_mv AT dabulgakova theappreciationofthejurisdictionofcrimescommittedduringcommercialspaceflights
AT vabulgakova theappreciationofthejurisdictionofcrimescommittedduringcommercialspaceflights
AT dabulgakova appreciationofthejurisdictionofcrimescommittedduringcommercialspaceflights
AT vabulgakova appreciationofthejurisdictionofcrimescommittedduringcommercialspaceflights