Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation

In the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process, the operating conditions are essential in determining laser-induced keyhole regimes based on the thermal distribution. These regimes, classified into shallow and deep keyholes, control the probability and defects formation intensity in the LPBF process....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Asif Ur Rehman, Muhammad Arif Mahmood, Fatih Pitir, Metin Uymaz Salamci, Andrei C. Popescu, Ion N. Mihailescu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Nanomaterials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/11/12/3284
_version_ 1827670726900973568
author Asif Ur Rehman
Muhammad Arif Mahmood
Fatih Pitir
Metin Uymaz Salamci
Andrei C. Popescu
Ion N. Mihailescu
author_facet Asif Ur Rehman
Muhammad Arif Mahmood
Fatih Pitir
Metin Uymaz Salamci
Andrei C. Popescu
Ion N. Mihailescu
author_sort Asif Ur Rehman
collection DOAJ
description In the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process, the operating conditions are essential in determining laser-induced keyhole regimes based on the thermal distribution. These regimes, classified into shallow and deep keyholes, control the probability and defects formation intensity in the LPBF process. To study and control the keyhole in the LPBF process, mathematical and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models are presented. For CFD, the volume of fluid method with the discrete element modeling technique was used, while a mathematical model was developed by including the laser beam absorption by the powder bed voids and surface. The dynamic melt pool behavior is explored in detail. Quantitative comparisons are made among experimental, CFD simulation and analytical computing results leading to a good correspondence. In LPBF, the temperature around the laser irradiation zone rises rapidly compared to the surroundings in the powder layer due to the high thermal resistance and the air between the powder particles, resulting in a slow travel of laser transverse heat waves. In LPBF, the keyhole can be classified into shallow and deep keyhole mode, controlled by the energy density. Increasing the energy density, the shallow keyhole mode transforms into the deep keyhole mode. The energy density in a deep keyhole is higher due to the multiple reflections and concentrations of secondary reflected beams within the keyhole, causing the material to vaporize quickly. Due to an elevated temperature distribution in deep keyhole mode, the probability of pores forming is much higher than in a shallow keyhole as the liquid material is close to the vaporization temperature. When the temperature increases rapidly, the material density drops quickly, thus, raising the fluid volume due to the specific heat and fusion latent heat. In return, this lowers the surface tension and affects the melt pool uniformity.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T03:26:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-344be33337db4a70bb3a8bfbcaadd55e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-4991
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T03:26:08Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Nanomaterials
spelling doaj.art-344be33337db4a70bb3a8bfbcaadd55e2023-11-23T09:50:29ZengMDPI AGNanomaterials2079-49912021-12-011112328410.3390/nano11123284Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical ValidationAsif Ur Rehman0Muhammad Arif Mahmood1Fatih Pitir2Metin Uymaz Salamci3Andrei C. Popescu4Ion N. Mihailescu5ERMAKSAN, Bursa 16065, TurkeyNational Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), Magurele, 077125 Ilfov, RomaniaERMAKSAN, Bursa 16065, TurkeyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara 06570, TurkeyNational Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), Magurele, 077125 Ilfov, RomaniaNational Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), Magurele, 077125 Ilfov, RomaniaIn the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process, the operating conditions are essential in determining laser-induced keyhole regimes based on the thermal distribution. These regimes, classified into shallow and deep keyholes, control the probability and defects formation intensity in the LPBF process. To study and control the keyhole in the LPBF process, mathematical and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models are presented. For CFD, the volume of fluid method with the discrete element modeling technique was used, while a mathematical model was developed by including the laser beam absorption by the powder bed voids and surface. The dynamic melt pool behavior is explored in detail. Quantitative comparisons are made among experimental, CFD simulation and analytical computing results leading to a good correspondence. In LPBF, the temperature around the laser irradiation zone rises rapidly compared to the surroundings in the powder layer due to the high thermal resistance and the air between the powder particles, resulting in a slow travel of laser transverse heat waves. In LPBF, the keyhole can be classified into shallow and deep keyhole mode, controlled by the energy density. Increasing the energy density, the shallow keyhole mode transforms into the deep keyhole mode. The energy density in a deep keyhole is higher due to the multiple reflections and concentrations of secondary reflected beams within the keyhole, causing the material to vaporize quickly. Due to an elevated temperature distribution in deep keyhole mode, the probability of pores forming is much higher than in a shallow keyhole as the liquid material is close to the vaporization temperature. When the temperature increases rapidly, the material density drops quickly, thus, raising the fluid volume due to the specific heat and fusion latent heat. In return, this lowers the surface tension and affects the melt pool uniformity.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/11/12/3284laser powder bed fusioncomputational fluid dynamicsanalytical modellingshallow and deep keyhole modesexperimental correlation
spellingShingle Asif Ur Rehman
Muhammad Arif Mahmood
Fatih Pitir
Metin Uymaz Salamci
Andrei C. Popescu
Ion N. Mihailescu
Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation
Nanomaterials
laser powder bed fusion
computational fluid dynamics
analytical modelling
shallow and deep keyhole modes
experimental correlation
title Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation
title_full Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation
title_fullStr Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation
title_full_unstemmed Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation
title_short Keyhole Formation by Laser Drilling in Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti6Al4V Biomedical Alloy: Mesoscopic Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation versus Mathematical Modelling Using Empirical Validation
title_sort keyhole formation by laser drilling in laser powder bed fusion of ti6al4v biomedical alloy mesoscopic computational fluid dynamics simulation versus mathematical modelling using empirical validation
topic laser powder bed fusion
computational fluid dynamics
analytical modelling
shallow and deep keyhole modes
experimental correlation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/11/12/3284
work_keys_str_mv AT asifurrehman keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation
AT muhammadarifmahmood keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation
AT fatihpitir keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation
AT metinuymazsalamci keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation
AT andreicpopescu keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation
AT ionnmihailescu keyholeformationbylaserdrillinginlaserpowderbedfusionofti6al4vbiomedicalalloymesoscopiccomputationalfluiddynamicssimulationversusmathematicalmodellingusingempiricalvalidation