Comparison of Antibacterial Activity of Self-adhesive Flowable Composite, Microhybrid Flowable Composite and Self-curing Glass Ionomer Against Streptococcus Mutans: An In Vitro Study
Background and purpose: Antibacterial properties of restorative materials are of great advantage as they control the progression of tooth decay. The use of self-adhesive composite materials has some benefits such as easier application and reduced treatment time. Because the antibacterial properties...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
2023-03-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-18191-en.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797542656797048832 |
|---|---|
| author | Shadiyeh Molaee Reza Mohammadzadeh Mohsen Arzanlou Hamed Zandian Navid Babaei Armita Mowlaei |
| author_facet | Shadiyeh Molaee Reza Mohammadzadeh Mohsen Arzanlou Hamed Zandian Navid Babaei Armita Mowlaei |
| author_sort | Shadiyeh Molaee |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background and purpose: Antibacterial properties of restorative materials are of great advantage as they control the progression of tooth decay. The use of self-adhesive composite materials has some benefits such as easier application and reduced treatment time. Because the antibacterial properties of restorative materials can play an important role in preventing secondary decay, especially in cervical restorations, this study was designed to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of self-adhesive flowable composite against Streptococcus mutans.
Materials and methods: An in vitro study was performed using 9 discs for each composite and glass ionomer group. The discs were prepared in three groups: micro-hybrid flowable composite samples, self-adhesive flowable composite samples, and self-curing glass ionomer samples. Direct contact test was used to compare the antibacterial properties of the discs. Data collection was done by direct contact test and visual counting of grown bacterial colonies. Data were recorded in a checklist developed according to the objectives of the study and analyzed using One-way ANOVA and Independent T-test in SPSS V22.
Results: Findings showed that the antibacterial effect of glass ionomer was greater than that of flowable micro-hybrid composite and self-adhesive flowable composite. Also, a significant difference was observed between the antimicrobial activity of flowable microhybrid composite and self-adhesive flowable composite against Streptococcus mutans (P<0.05).
Conclusion: Glass ionomer and self-adhesive composite have a higher antibacterial effect against Streptococcus mutans, so they can be used as alternatives to treat tooth decay |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T13:34:40Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-344ef8db1db74c18a2c78cf6e3ddb878 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1735-9260 1735-9279 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T13:34:40Z |
| publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
| publisher | Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-344ef8db1db74c18a2c78cf6e3ddb8782023-11-21T07:40:31ZengMazandaran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences1735-92601735-92792023-03-01322181321Comparison of Antibacterial Activity of Self-adhesive Flowable Composite, Microhybrid Flowable Composite and Self-curing Glass Ionomer Against Streptococcus Mutans: An In Vitro StudyShadiyeh Molaee0Reza Mohammadzadeh1Mohsen Arzanlou2Hamed Zandian3Navid Babaei4Armita Mowlaei5 Assistant Professor, Department of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran Doctor od Dental Surgery, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran Professor, Department of Medical Bacteriology and Immunology, Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran Assistant Professor, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran Doctor of Dental Surgery, School of Dentistry, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran Dentistry Student, Tibb University of Azerbaijan, Baku, Azeraijan Background and purpose: Antibacterial properties of restorative materials are of great advantage as they control the progression of tooth decay. The use of self-adhesive composite materials has some benefits such as easier application and reduced treatment time. Because the antibacterial properties of restorative materials can play an important role in preventing secondary decay, especially in cervical restorations, this study was designed to evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of self-adhesive flowable composite against Streptococcus mutans. Materials and methods: An in vitro study was performed using 9 discs for each composite and glass ionomer group. The discs were prepared in three groups: micro-hybrid flowable composite samples, self-adhesive flowable composite samples, and self-curing glass ionomer samples. Direct contact test was used to compare the antibacterial properties of the discs. Data collection was done by direct contact test and visual counting of grown bacterial colonies. Data were recorded in a checklist developed according to the objectives of the study and analyzed using One-way ANOVA and Independent T-test in SPSS V22. Results: Findings showed that the antibacterial effect of glass ionomer was greater than that of flowable micro-hybrid composite and self-adhesive flowable composite. Also, a significant difference was observed between the antimicrobial activity of flowable microhybrid composite and self-adhesive flowable composite against Streptococcus mutans (P<0.05). Conclusion: Glass ionomer and self-adhesive composite have a higher antibacterial effect against Streptococcus mutans, so they can be used as alternatives to treat tooth decayhttp://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-18191-en.pdfantibacterial effectflowable compositesecondary cariesself-adhesive flowable composite |
| spellingShingle | Shadiyeh Molaee Reza Mohammadzadeh Mohsen Arzanlou Hamed Zandian Navid Babaei Armita Mowlaei Comparison of Antibacterial Activity of Self-adhesive Flowable Composite, Microhybrid Flowable Composite and Self-curing Glass Ionomer Against Streptococcus Mutans: An In Vitro Study Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences antibacterial effect flowable composite secondary caries self-adhesive flowable composite |
| title | Comparison of Antibacterial Activity of Self-adhesive Flowable Composite, Microhybrid Flowable Composite and Self-curing Glass Ionomer Against Streptococcus Mutans: An In Vitro Study |
| title_full | Comparison of Antibacterial Activity of Self-adhesive Flowable Composite, Microhybrid Flowable Composite and Self-curing Glass Ionomer Against Streptococcus Mutans: An In Vitro Study |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Antibacterial Activity of Self-adhesive Flowable Composite, Microhybrid Flowable Composite and Self-curing Glass Ionomer Against Streptococcus Mutans: An In Vitro Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Antibacterial Activity of Self-adhesive Flowable Composite, Microhybrid Flowable Composite and Self-curing Glass Ionomer Against Streptococcus Mutans: An In Vitro Study |
| title_short | Comparison of Antibacterial Activity of Self-adhesive Flowable Composite, Microhybrid Flowable Composite and Self-curing Glass Ionomer Against Streptococcus Mutans: An In Vitro Study |
| title_sort | comparison of antibacterial activity of self adhesive flowable composite microhybrid flowable composite and self curing glass ionomer against streptococcus mutans an in vitro study |
| topic | antibacterial effect flowable composite secondary caries self-adhesive flowable composite |
| url | http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-18191-en.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT shadiyehmolaee comparisonofantibacterialactivityofselfadhesiveflowablecompositemicrohybridflowablecompositeandselfcuringglassionomeragainststreptococcusmutansaninvitrostudy AT rezamohammadzadeh comparisonofantibacterialactivityofselfadhesiveflowablecompositemicrohybridflowablecompositeandselfcuringglassionomeragainststreptococcusmutansaninvitrostudy AT mohsenarzanlou comparisonofantibacterialactivityofselfadhesiveflowablecompositemicrohybridflowablecompositeandselfcuringglassionomeragainststreptococcusmutansaninvitrostudy AT hamedzandian comparisonofantibacterialactivityofselfadhesiveflowablecompositemicrohybridflowablecompositeandselfcuringglassionomeragainststreptococcusmutansaninvitrostudy AT navidbabaei comparisonofantibacterialactivityofselfadhesiveflowablecompositemicrohybridflowablecompositeandselfcuringglassionomeragainststreptococcusmutansaninvitrostudy AT armitamowlaei comparisonofantibacterialactivityofselfadhesiveflowablecompositemicrohybridflowablecompositeandselfcuringglassionomeragainststreptococcusmutansaninvitrostudy |