Keeping in Motion or Staying Put: Internal Migration in the United States and China
The rate of people moving within the United States is at one of its lowest points in U.S. history, while China has experienced unprecedented levels of domestic migration. While both are world-leading economies, these countries demonstrate stark contrasts in geographic mobility, urbanization, and eco...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-07-01
|
| Series: | Societies |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/7/162 |
| _version_ | 1797587433761538048 |
|---|---|
| author | Joshua Dietz Bulin Li Ernesto Castañeda |
| author_facet | Joshua Dietz Bulin Li Ernesto Castañeda |
| author_sort | Joshua Dietz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The rate of people moving within the United States is at one of its lowest points in U.S. history, while China has experienced unprecedented levels of domestic migration. While both are world-leading economies, these countries demonstrate stark contrasts in geographic mobility, urbanization, and economic growth. Despite these differences, social factors affect migration capabilities in both places, with some people more mobile than others. This study assesses internal migration and highlights the structural and social determinants of mobility in both countries. This article’s analysis reveals an accentuated downturn and the longest annual decline recorded in the U.S. Evidence shows declining internal migration in the U.S. primarily occurring at the local level and amongst renters. Large and expensive American cities have had significant losses of residents in recent years. By contrast, China’s “floating population” has increased as migrants move to cities. This study examines trends from 2010 to 2020 to compare the two countries regarding internal migration, urbanization, housing, social mobility, and economic growth. However, rather than simply comparing them, the paper argues that the internal migration dynamics in both countries are, to a degree, connected. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T00:38:53Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-34613d3f584546e9b31858b0437b61e7 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2075-4698 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T00:38:53Z |
| publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Societies |
| spelling | doaj.art-34613d3f584546e9b31858b0437b61e72023-11-18T21:21:37ZengMDPI AGSocieties2075-46982023-07-0113716210.3390/soc13070162Keeping in Motion or Staying Put: Internal Migration in the United States and ChinaJoshua Dietz0Bulin Li1Ernesto Castañeda2The Immigration Lab, and the Department of Sociology, College of Arts and Sciences, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USAThe Immigration Lab, and the Department of Sociology, College of Arts and Sciences, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USAThe Immigration Lab, and the Department of Sociology, College of Arts and Sciences, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USAThe rate of people moving within the United States is at one of its lowest points in U.S. history, while China has experienced unprecedented levels of domestic migration. While both are world-leading economies, these countries demonstrate stark contrasts in geographic mobility, urbanization, and economic growth. Despite these differences, social factors affect migration capabilities in both places, with some people more mobile than others. This study assesses internal migration and highlights the structural and social determinants of mobility in both countries. This article’s analysis reveals an accentuated downturn and the longest annual decline recorded in the U.S. Evidence shows declining internal migration in the U.S. primarily occurring at the local level and amongst renters. Large and expensive American cities have had significant losses of residents in recent years. By contrast, China’s “floating population” has increased as migrants move to cities. This study examines trends from 2010 to 2020 to compare the two countries regarding internal migration, urbanization, housing, social mobility, and economic growth. However, rather than simply comparing them, the paper argues that the internal migration dynamics in both countries are, to a degree, connected.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/7/162city growthintercounty moveslabor relocationhukoufloating population |
| spellingShingle | Joshua Dietz Bulin Li Ernesto Castañeda Keeping in Motion or Staying Put: Internal Migration in the United States and China Societies city growth intercounty moves labor relocation hukou floating population |
| title | Keeping in Motion or Staying Put: Internal Migration in the United States and China |
| title_full | Keeping in Motion or Staying Put: Internal Migration in the United States and China |
| title_fullStr | Keeping in Motion or Staying Put: Internal Migration in the United States and China |
| title_full_unstemmed | Keeping in Motion or Staying Put: Internal Migration in the United States and China |
| title_short | Keeping in Motion or Staying Put: Internal Migration in the United States and China |
| title_sort | keeping in motion or staying put internal migration in the united states and china |
| topic | city growth intercounty moves labor relocation hukou floating population |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/13/7/162 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT joshuadietz keepinginmotionorstayingputinternalmigrationintheunitedstatesandchina AT bulinli keepinginmotionorstayingputinternalmigrationintheunitedstatesandchina AT ernestocastaneda keepinginmotionorstayingputinternalmigrationintheunitedstatesandchina |