Evaluation of planning and territorial management processes: a methodological contribution from a review of approaches
The ‘new strategic territorial planning’, reappeared in Europe at the end of the 20th century, intrinsically incorporates the need for evaluation of land use plans. This evaluation cannot focus solely on evaluating the impact of the plans but must also be carried out with a focus on the technical p...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Catalan |
| Published: |
Universitat de València, Departament de Geografia
2020-07-01
|
| Series: | Cuadernos de Geografía de la Universitat de València |
| Online Access: | https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/CGUV/article/view/17304 |
| _version_ | 1819056771672571904 |
|---|---|
| author | Pablo Pinazo-Dallenbach Diana Ximena Tutistar-Rosero |
| author_facet | Pablo Pinazo-Dallenbach Diana Ximena Tutistar-Rosero |
| author_sort | Pablo Pinazo-Dallenbach |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The ‘new strategic territorial planning’, reappeared in Europe at the end of the 20th century, intrinsically incorporates the need for evaluation of land use plans. This evaluation cannot focus solely on evaluating the impact of the plans but must also be carried out with a focus on the technical processes in which material goods are produced and knowledge generation. The present work intends to provide the methodological framework to be able to develop an evaluation instrument for planning processes and management of land use plans.
Using an analysis matrix, different evaluation approaches are compared in order to select the most convenient category for the evaluation of territorial planning processes. Thereby, the most interesting approaches are selected, and are subsequently characterized by identifying the most representative authors, the methods applied, the phases that compose them, the criteria used to evaluate the processes, their strengths and weaknesses, and the evaluation questions.
Results reflect that the process evaluation approaches that belong to the eclectic approaches category seem to be the most interesting for territorial planning, since by their nature they combine the advantages of the approaches they use, and adapt methodologies and philosophies to the needs of each specific evaluation, optimizing the evaluation results and actively involving the main stakeholders. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T13:28:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-346b776dd12d4079aac7996a7d9a71ff |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0210-086X 2695-7965 |
| language | Catalan |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T13:28:43Z |
| publishDate | 2020-07-01 |
| publisher | Universitat de València, Departament de Geografia |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cuadernos de Geografía de la Universitat de València |
| spelling | doaj.art-346b776dd12d4079aac7996a7d9a71ff2022-12-21T19:02:23ZcatUniversitat de València, Departament de GeografiaCuadernos de Geografía de la Universitat de València0210-086X2695-79652020-07-010104298610.7203/CGUV.104.1730412776Evaluation of planning and territorial management processes: a methodological contribution from a review of approachesPablo Pinazo-Dallenbach0Diana Ximena Tutistar-Rosero1<p>Universitat de València</p><p>Universitat de València</p>The ‘new strategic territorial planning’, reappeared in Europe at the end of the 20th century, intrinsically incorporates the need for evaluation of land use plans. This evaluation cannot focus solely on evaluating the impact of the plans but must also be carried out with a focus on the technical processes in which material goods are produced and knowledge generation. The present work intends to provide the methodological framework to be able to develop an evaluation instrument for planning processes and management of land use plans. Using an analysis matrix, different evaluation approaches are compared in order to select the most convenient category for the evaluation of territorial planning processes. Thereby, the most interesting approaches are selected, and are subsequently characterized by identifying the most representative authors, the methods applied, the phases that compose them, the criteria used to evaluate the processes, their strengths and weaknesses, and the evaluation questions. Results reflect that the process evaluation approaches that belong to the eclectic approaches category seem to be the most interesting for territorial planning, since by their nature they combine the advantages of the approaches they use, and adapt methodologies and philosophies to the needs of each specific evaluation, optimizing the evaluation results and actively involving the main stakeholders.https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/CGUV/article/view/17304 |
| spellingShingle | Pablo Pinazo-Dallenbach Diana Ximena Tutistar-Rosero Evaluation of planning and territorial management processes: a methodological contribution from a review of approaches Cuadernos de Geografía de la Universitat de València |
| title | Evaluation of planning and territorial management processes: a methodological contribution from a review of approaches |
| title_full | Evaluation of planning and territorial management processes: a methodological contribution from a review of approaches |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of planning and territorial management processes: a methodological contribution from a review of approaches |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of planning and territorial management processes: a methodological contribution from a review of approaches |
| title_short | Evaluation of planning and territorial management processes: a methodological contribution from a review of approaches |
| title_sort | evaluation of planning and territorial management processes a methodological contribution from a review of approaches |
| url | https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/CGUV/article/view/17304 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pablopinazodallenbach evaluationofplanningandterritorialmanagementprocessesamethodologicalcontributionfromareviewofapproaches AT dianaximenatutistarrosero evaluationofplanningandterritorialmanagementprocessesamethodologicalcontributionfromareviewofapproaches |