Bude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in Lafkenche territory

Tubul-Raqui, in the Lafkenche territory of Arauco, southern Chile, is a wetland for conservation scientists and state officials, but a bude for Lafkenche people. Wetland and bude sometimes coincide, but they are also radically divergent. This paper, a collaboration between two scholars and a Lafkenc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manuel Tironi, Denisse Vega, Juan Roa Antileo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
Series:Tapuya
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2021.1984639
_version_ 1818320750037172224
author Manuel Tironi
Denisse Vega
Juan Roa Antileo
author_facet Manuel Tironi
Denisse Vega
Juan Roa Antileo
author_sort Manuel Tironi
collection DOAJ
description Tubul-Raqui, in the Lafkenche territory of Arauco, southern Chile, is a wetland for conservation scientists and state officials, but a bude for Lafkenche people. Wetland and bude sometimes coincide, but they are also radically divergent. This paper, a collaboration between two scholars and a Lafkenche longko, is about the existential and political consequences of this disjuncture for Lafkenche life projects and struggles for self-determination. By chronicling two recent events in Tubul-Raqui – the implementation of a sustainable plan for wetland conservation and the 2010 tsunami – we argue that liberal conservation programs under the rubric of “sustainability,” or what we call convivial conservation, only reinforce Indigenous disspossesion and extenuates Lafkenche lives. We show, as well, that the decolonization of conservation entails accounting for the plural meanings, practices, and temporalities of extinction – since death in Tubul-Raqui was not brought by the tsunami but by the extreme latency of extractivism, or what we call extractivist endings. We conclude by reflecting on the political trap faced by Lafkenche communities in Tubul-Raqui – the impossibilty to save the bude without converting it into a wetland – and to what extent this situation demands for a mode of politics that inhabits at the intersection between the plausible and the unconceivable – or what we call an unthinkable politics.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T10:29:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-347342fc76f0429d9f72e9b5e57f5da8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2572-9861
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T10:29:58Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Tapuya
spelling doaj.art-347342fc76f0429d9f72e9b5e57f5da82022-12-21T23:50:52ZengTaylor & Francis GroupTapuya2572-98612021-01-014110.1080/25729861.2021.19846391984639Bude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in Lafkenche territoryManuel Tironi0Denisse Vega1Juan Roa Antileo2Instituto de Sociología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileInstituto de Sociología, Pontificia Universidad Católica de ChileLongko of the Chilcoco Community, WallmapuTubul-Raqui, in the Lafkenche territory of Arauco, southern Chile, is a wetland for conservation scientists and state officials, but a bude for Lafkenche people. Wetland and bude sometimes coincide, but they are also radically divergent. This paper, a collaboration between two scholars and a Lafkenche longko, is about the existential and political consequences of this disjuncture for Lafkenche life projects and struggles for self-determination. By chronicling two recent events in Tubul-Raqui – the implementation of a sustainable plan for wetland conservation and the 2010 tsunami – we argue that liberal conservation programs under the rubric of “sustainability,” or what we call convivial conservation, only reinforce Indigenous disspossesion and extenuates Lafkenche lives. We show, as well, that the decolonization of conservation entails accounting for the plural meanings, practices, and temporalities of extinction – since death in Tubul-Raqui was not brought by the tsunami but by the extreme latency of extractivism, or what we call extractivist endings. We conclude by reflecting on the political trap faced by Lafkenche communities in Tubul-Raqui – the impossibilty to save the bude without converting it into a wetland – and to what extent this situation demands for a mode of politics that inhabits at the intersection between the plausible and the unconceivable – or what we call an unthinkable politics.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2021.1984639conservationdecolonizationextinctionindigenous politicschile
spellingShingle Manuel Tironi
Denisse Vega
Juan Roa Antileo
Bude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in Lafkenche territory
Tapuya
conservation
decolonization
extinction
indigenous politics
chile
title Bude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in Lafkenche territory
title_full Bude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in Lafkenche territory
title_fullStr Bude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in Lafkenche territory
title_full_unstemmed Bude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in Lafkenche territory
title_short Bude uncommon: extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in Lafkenche territory
title_sort bude uncommon extractivist endings and the unthinkable politics of conservation in lafkenche territory
topic conservation
decolonization
extinction
indigenous politics
chile
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2021.1984639
work_keys_str_mv AT manueltironi budeuncommonextractivistendingsandtheunthinkablepoliticsofconservationinlafkencheterritory
AT denissevega budeuncommonextractivistendingsandtheunthinkablepoliticsofconservationinlafkencheterritory
AT juanroaantileo budeuncommonextractivistendingsandtheunthinkablepoliticsofconservationinlafkencheterritory