Design principles, manufacturing and evaluation techniques of custom dynamic ankle‐foot orthoses: a review study

Abstract Ankle‐Foot Orthoses (AFO) can be prescribed to allow drop‐foot patients to restore a quasi‐normal gait pattern. Standard off‐the‐shelf AFOs are cost‐effective solutions to treat most patients with foot and ankle weakness, but these devices have several limitations, especially in terms of co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giulia Rogati, Paolo Caravaggi, Alberto Leardini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00547-2
_version_ 1797321284074340352
author Giulia Rogati
Paolo Caravaggi
Alberto Leardini
author_facet Giulia Rogati
Paolo Caravaggi
Alberto Leardini
author_sort Giulia Rogati
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Ankle‐Foot Orthoses (AFO) can be prescribed to allow drop‐foot patients to restore a quasi‐normal gait pattern. Standard off‐the‐shelf AFOs are cost‐effective solutions to treat most patients with foot and ankle weakness, but these devices have several limitations, especially in terms of comfort. Therefore, custom AFOs are increasingly adopted to address drop‐foot when standard solutions are not adequate. While the solid ones are the most common type of AFO, providing full stability and strong resistance to ankle plantarflexion, passive dynamic AFOs (PD‐AFOs) represent the ideal solution for patients with less severe ankle weakness. PD‐AFOs have a flexible calf shell, which can bend during the stance phase of walking and absorb energy that can be released to support the limb in the push‐off phase. The aim of this review is to assess the state‐of‐the‐art and identify the current limitations of PD‐AFOs. An extensive literature review was performed in Google Scholar to identify all studies on custom PD‐AFOs. Only those papers reporting on custom PD‐AFOs were included in the review. Non peer‐reviewed papers, abstract shorter than three pages, lecture notes and thesis dissertations were excluded from the analysis. Particular attention was given to the customization principles and the mechanical and functional tests. For each topic, the main results from all relevant papers are reported and summarized herein. There were 75 papers that corresponded to the search criteria. These were grouped according to the following macro‐topics: 16 focusing on scanning technologies and geometry acquisition; 14 on customization criteria; 19 on production techniques; 16 on mechanical testing, and 33 on functional testing. According to the present review, design and production of custom PD‐AFOs are becoming increasingly feasible due to advancements in 3D scanning techniques and additive manufacturing. In general, custom PD‐AFOs were shown to provide better comfort and improved spatio‐temporal parameters with respect to standard solutions. However, no customization principle to adapt PD‐AFO stiffness to the patient's degree of ankle impairment or mechanical/functional demand has thus far been proposed.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T04:56:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-347356f679fa42be8a53a7abf8fe834d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1757-1146
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T04:56:17Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
spelling doaj.art-347356f679fa42be8a53a7abf8fe834d2024-02-07T15:15:30ZengWileyJournal of Foot and Ankle Research1757-11462022-01-01151n/an/a10.1186/s13047-022-00547-2Design principles, manufacturing and evaluation techniques of custom dynamic ankle‐foot orthoses: a review studyGiulia Rogati0Paolo Caravaggi1Alberto Leardini2Movement Analysis LaboratoryIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliVia di Barbiano 1/1040136BolognaItalyMovement Analysis LaboratoryIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliVia di Barbiano 1/1040136BolognaItalyMovement Analysis LaboratoryIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliVia di Barbiano 1/1040136BolognaItalyAbstract Ankle‐Foot Orthoses (AFO) can be prescribed to allow drop‐foot patients to restore a quasi‐normal gait pattern. Standard off‐the‐shelf AFOs are cost‐effective solutions to treat most patients with foot and ankle weakness, but these devices have several limitations, especially in terms of comfort. Therefore, custom AFOs are increasingly adopted to address drop‐foot when standard solutions are not adequate. While the solid ones are the most common type of AFO, providing full stability and strong resistance to ankle plantarflexion, passive dynamic AFOs (PD‐AFOs) represent the ideal solution for patients with less severe ankle weakness. PD‐AFOs have a flexible calf shell, which can bend during the stance phase of walking and absorb energy that can be released to support the limb in the push‐off phase. The aim of this review is to assess the state‐of‐the‐art and identify the current limitations of PD‐AFOs. An extensive literature review was performed in Google Scholar to identify all studies on custom PD‐AFOs. Only those papers reporting on custom PD‐AFOs were included in the review. Non peer‐reviewed papers, abstract shorter than three pages, lecture notes and thesis dissertations were excluded from the analysis. Particular attention was given to the customization principles and the mechanical and functional tests. For each topic, the main results from all relevant papers are reported and summarized herein. There were 75 papers that corresponded to the search criteria. These were grouped according to the following macro‐topics: 16 focusing on scanning technologies and geometry acquisition; 14 on customization criteria; 19 on production techniques; 16 on mechanical testing, and 33 on functional testing. According to the present review, design and production of custom PD‐AFOs are becoming increasingly feasible due to advancements in 3D scanning techniques and additive manufacturing. In general, custom PD‐AFOs were shown to provide better comfort and improved spatio‐temporal parameters with respect to standard solutions. However, no customization principle to adapt PD‐AFO stiffness to the patient's degree of ankle impairment or mechanical/functional demand has thus far been proposed.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00547-2Ankle foot orthosisDynamicCustomDrop‐footAdditive manufacturing3D scanning
spellingShingle Giulia Rogati
Paolo Caravaggi
Alberto Leardini
Design principles, manufacturing and evaluation techniques of custom dynamic ankle‐foot orthoses: a review study
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Ankle foot orthosis
Dynamic
Custom
Drop‐foot
Additive manufacturing
3D scanning
title Design principles, manufacturing and evaluation techniques of custom dynamic ankle‐foot orthoses: a review study
title_full Design principles, manufacturing and evaluation techniques of custom dynamic ankle‐foot orthoses: a review study
title_fullStr Design principles, manufacturing and evaluation techniques of custom dynamic ankle‐foot orthoses: a review study
title_full_unstemmed Design principles, manufacturing and evaluation techniques of custom dynamic ankle‐foot orthoses: a review study
title_short Design principles, manufacturing and evaluation techniques of custom dynamic ankle‐foot orthoses: a review study
title_sort design principles manufacturing and evaluation techniques of custom dynamic ankle foot orthoses a review study
topic Ankle foot orthosis
Dynamic
Custom
Drop‐foot
Additive manufacturing
3D scanning
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-022-00547-2
work_keys_str_mv AT giuliarogati designprinciplesmanufacturingandevaluationtechniquesofcustomdynamicanklefootorthosesareviewstudy
AT paolocaravaggi designprinciplesmanufacturingandevaluationtechniquesofcustomdynamicanklefootorthosesareviewstudy
AT albertoleardini designprinciplesmanufacturingandevaluationtechniquesofcustomdynamicanklefootorthosesareviewstudy