Constitutions and Gender Equality in Chile and Argentina

Gender equality provisions have become nearly standard in constitutional design for new democracies. How do such provisions affect the ability of women’s rights advocates to achieve social change? To address this question, we compare the political use (legislation, policy, and judicial interpretatio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Priscilla Lambert, Druscilla Scribner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-08-01
Series:Journal of Politics in Latin America
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X211024245
_version_ 1830349977186992128
author Priscilla Lambert
Druscilla Scribner
author_facet Priscilla Lambert
Druscilla Scribner
author_sort Priscilla Lambert
collection DOAJ
description Gender equality provisions have become nearly standard in constitutional design for new democracies. How do such provisions affect the ability of women’s rights advocates to achieve social change? To address this question, we compare the political use (legislation, policy, and judicial interpretation) of these provisions in Chile and Argentina, countries that differ with respect to how they have constitutionalised gender rights. The comparative analysis demonstrates how gender-specific constitutional provisions provide a legal basis and legitimacy for women’s rights advocates to advance new policy, protect policy gains, and pursue rights-based cases through the courts.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T00:13:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3477a966be6245948c7a3a773516013b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1866-802X
1868-4890
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T00:13:24Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Politics in Latin America
spelling doaj.art-3477a966be6245948c7a3a773516013b2022-12-21T20:00:27ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Politics in Latin America1866-802X1868-48902021-08-011310.1177/1866802X211024245Constitutions and Gender Equality in Chile and ArgentinaPriscilla Lambert0Druscilla Scribner1 Department of Political Science, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI, USAGender equality provisions have become nearly standard in constitutional design for new democracies. How do such provisions affect the ability of women’s rights advocates to achieve social change? To address this question, we compare the political use (legislation, policy, and judicial interpretation) of these provisions in Chile and Argentina, countries that differ with respect to how they have constitutionalised gender rights. The comparative analysis demonstrates how gender-specific constitutional provisions provide a legal basis and legitimacy for women’s rights advocates to advance new policy, protect policy gains, and pursue rights-based cases through the courts.https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X211024245
spellingShingle Priscilla Lambert
Druscilla Scribner
Constitutions and Gender Equality in Chile and Argentina
Journal of Politics in Latin America
title Constitutions and Gender Equality in Chile and Argentina
title_full Constitutions and Gender Equality in Chile and Argentina
title_fullStr Constitutions and Gender Equality in Chile and Argentina
title_full_unstemmed Constitutions and Gender Equality in Chile and Argentina
title_short Constitutions and Gender Equality in Chile and Argentina
title_sort constitutions and gender equality in chile and argentina
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1866802X211024245
work_keys_str_mv AT priscillalambert constitutionsandgenderequalityinchileandargentina
AT druscillascribner constitutionsandgenderequalityinchileandargentina