Validity of smartphone-based retinal photography (PEEK-retina) compared to the standard ophthalmic fundus camera in diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in Uganda: A cross-sectional study.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the major complications of diabetes mellitus and is a significant cause of blindness worldwide. In Uganda, the prevalence of diabetes is approximately 2.7% of the urban population and 1% in rural areas. Many diabetics cannot access...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed Mohamud Yusuf, Rebecca Claire Lusobya, John Mukisa, Charles Batte, Damalie Nakanjako, Otiti Juliet-Sengeri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273633
_version_ 1811241877509242880
author Ahmed Mohamud Yusuf
Rebecca Claire Lusobya
John Mukisa
Charles Batte
Damalie Nakanjako
Otiti Juliet-Sengeri
author_facet Ahmed Mohamud Yusuf
Rebecca Claire Lusobya
John Mukisa
Charles Batte
Damalie Nakanjako
Otiti Juliet-Sengeri
author_sort Ahmed Mohamud Yusuf
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the major complications of diabetes mellitus and is a significant cause of blindness worldwide. In Uganda, the prevalence of diabetes is approximately 2.7% of the urban population and 1% in rural areas. Many diabetics cannot access an eye exam due to the lack of less costly and user-friendly equipment that primary eye workers can use. Smartphone-based fundus photography allows for a cheap and mobile fundus examination. The study aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Portable Eye Examination Kit (PEEK) retina compared to a standard ophthalmic fundus camera (Zeiss Visucam 200) for the diagnosis of DR.<h4>Methods</h4>From January-March 2020, 286 people with diabetes (type 1 & 2) patients were seen at Kiruddu National referral hospital diabetes clinic. All participants had funduscopy with PEEK retina and the standard ophthalmic fundus camera following ophthalmic examination and pupillary dilation. The PEEK retina's sensitivity, specificity and reliability were determined using an ophthalmic fundus camera as the gold standard.<h4>Results</h4>The participants' mean age was 51 with a standard deviation of ±11years, 213 (74.5%) were females, and the majority (93.4%) had Type 2 diabetes. The overall Sensitivity of PEEK retina for DR was 84% (95% CI 70.9-83.5), while the specificity was 79.9% (95% CI 76-83.5) with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 30.9% (95% CI 23.2-39.4) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.9% (95% CI 95.9-99.1).<h4>Conclusions</h4>PEEK retina has high sensitivity and specificity, making it suitable for screening and diagnostic purposes. Therefore, we recommend the integration of the PEEK retina in the screening and diagnosis of DR in resource-limited settings.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T13:42:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-348aef4351eb460f9dde3cd6c2c16594
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T13:42:46Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-348aef4351eb460f9dde3cd6c2c165942022-12-22T03:30:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01179e027363310.1371/journal.pone.0273633Validity of smartphone-based retinal photography (PEEK-retina) compared to the standard ophthalmic fundus camera in diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in Uganda: A cross-sectional study.Ahmed Mohamud YusufRebecca Claire LusobyaJohn MukisaCharles BatteDamalie NakanjakoOtiti Juliet-Sengeri<h4>Introduction</h4>Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the major complications of diabetes mellitus and is a significant cause of blindness worldwide. In Uganda, the prevalence of diabetes is approximately 2.7% of the urban population and 1% in rural areas. Many diabetics cannot access an eye exam due to the lack of less costly and user-friendly equipment that primary eye workers can use. Smartphone-based fundus photography allows for a cheap and mobile fundus examination. The study aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the Portable Eye Examination Kit (PEEK) retina compared to a standard ophthalmic fundus camera (Zeiss Visucam 200) for the diagnosis of DR.<h4>Methods</h4>From January-March 2020, 286 people with diabetes (type 1 & 2) patients were seen at Kiruddu National referral hospital diabetes clinic. All participants had funduscopy with PEEK retina and the standard ophthalmic fundus camera following ophthalmic examination and pupillary dilation. The PEEK retina's sensitivity, specificity and reliability were determined using an ophthalmic fundus camera as the gold standard.<h4>Results</h4>The participants' mean age was 51 with a standard deviation of ±11years, 213 (74.5%) were females, and the majority (93.4%) had Type 2 diabetes. The overall Sensitivity of PEEK retina for DR was 84% (95% CI 70.9-83.5), while the specificity was 79.9% (95% CI 76-83.5) with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 30.9% (95% CI 23.2-39.4) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.9% (95% CI 95.9-99.1).<h4>Conclusions</h4>PEEK retina has high sensitivity and specificity, making it suitable for screening and diagnostic purposes. Therefore, we recommend the integration of the PEEK retina in the screening and diagnosis of DR in resource-limited settings.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273633
spellingShingle Ahmed Mohamud Yusuf
Rebecca Claire Lusobya
John Mukisa
Charles Batte
Damalie Nakanjako
Otiti Juliet-Sengeri
Validity of smartphone-based retinal photography (PEEK-retina) compared to the standard ophthalmic fundus camera in diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in Uganda: A cross-sectional study.
PLoS ONE
title Validity of smartphone-based retinal photography (PEEK-retina) compared to the standard ophthalmic fundus camera in diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in Uganda: A cross-sectional study.
title_full Validity of smartphone-based retinal photography (PEEK-retina) compared to the standard ophthalmic fundus camera in diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in Uganda: A cross-sectional study.
title_fullStr Validity of smartphone-based retinal photography (PEEK-retina) compared to the standard ophthalmic fundus camera in diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in Uganda: A cross-sectional study.
title_full_unstemmed Validity of smartphone-based retinal photography (PEEK-retina) compared to the standard ophthalmic fundus camera in diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in Uganda: A cross-sectional study.
title_short Validity of smartphone-based retinal photography (PEEK-retina) compared to the standard ophthalmic fundus camera in diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in Uganda: A cross-sectional study.
title_sort validity of smartphone based retinal photography peek retina compared to the standard ophthalmic fundus camera in diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in uganda a cross sectional study
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273633
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedmohamudyusuf validityofsmartphonebasedretinalphotographypeekretinacomparedtothestandardophthalmicfunduscameraindiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT rebeccaclairelusobya validityofsmartphonebasedretinalphotographypeekretinacomparedtothestandardophthalmicfunduscameraindiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT johnmukisa validityofsmartphonebasedretinalphotographypeekretinacomparedtothestandardophthalmicfunduscameraindiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT charlesbatte validityofsmartphonebasedretinalphotographypeekretinacomparedtothestandardophthalmicfunduscameraindiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT damalienakanjako validityofsmartphonebasedretinalphotographypeekretinacomparedtothestandardophthalmicfunduscameraindiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinugandaacrosssectionalstudy
AT otitijulietsengeri validityofsmartphonebasedretinalphotographypeekretinacomparedtothestandardophthalmicfunduscameraindiagnosingdiabeticretinopathyinugandaacrosssectionalstudy