A new bioinformatics tool to help assess the significance of BRCA1 variants

Abstract Background Germline pathogenic variants in the breast cancer type 1 susceptibility gene BRCA1 are associated with a 60% lifetime risk for breast and ovarian cancer. This overall risk estimate is for all BRCA1 variants; obviously, not all variants confer the same risk of developing a disease...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isabelle Cusin, Daniel Teixeira, Monique Zahn-Zabal, Valentine Rech de Laval, Anne Gleizes, Valeria Viassolo, Pierre O. Chappuis, Pierre Hutter, Amos Bairoch, Pascale Gaudet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-07-01
Series:Human Genomics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40246-018-0168-0
_version_ 1811187877620482048
author Isabelle Cusin
Daniel Teixeira
Monique Zahn-Zabal
Valentine Rech de Laval
Anne Gleizes
Valeria Viassolo
Pierre O. Chappuis
Pierre Hutter
Amos Bairoch
Pascale Gaudet
author_facet Isabelle Cusin
Daniel Teixeira
Monique Zahn-Zabal
Valentine Rech de Laval
Anne Gleizes
Valeria Viassolo
Pierre O. Chappuis
Pierre Hutter
Amos Bairoch
Pascale Gaudet
author_sort Isabelle Cusin
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Germline pathogenic variants in the breast cancer type 1 susceptibility gene BRCA1 are associated with a 60% lifetime risk for breast and ovarian cancer. This overall risk estimate is for all BRCA1 variants; obviously, not all variants confer the same risk of developing a disease. In cancer patients, loss of BRCA1 function in tumor tissue has been associated with an increased sensitivity to platinum agents and to poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. For clinical management of both at-risk individuals and cancer patients, it would be important that each identified genetic variant be associated with clinical significance. Unfortunately for the vast majority of variants, the clinical impact is unknown. The availability of results from studies assessing the impact of variants on protein function may provide insight of crucial importance. Results and conclusion We have collected, curated, and structured the molecular and cellular phenotypic impact of 3654 distinct BRCA1 variants. The data was modeled in triple format, using the variant as a subject, the studied function as the object, and a predicate describing the relation between the two. Each annotation is supported by a fully traceable evidence. The data was captured using standard ontologies to ensure consistency, and enhance searchability and interoperability. We have assessed the extent to which functional defects at the molecular and cellular levels correlate with the clinical interpretation of variants by ClinVar submitters. Approximately 30% of the ClinVar BRCA1 missense variants have some molecular or cellular assay available in the literature. Pathogenic variants (as assigned by ClinVar) have at least some significant functional defect in 94% of testable cases. For benign variants, 77% of ClinVar benign variants, for which neXtProt Cancer variant portal has data, shows either no or mild experimental functional defects. While this does not provide evidence for clinical interpretation of variants, it may provide some guidance for variants of unknown significance, in the absence of more reliable data. The neXtProt Cancer variant portal (https://www.nextprot.org/portals/breast-cancer) contains over 6300 observations at the molecular and/or cellular level for BRCA1 variants.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T14:11:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3490c6acaf0b4b4d82f6cfe2451da075
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1479-7364
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T14:11:04Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Human Genomics
spelling doaj.art-3490c6acaf0b4b4d82f6cfe2451da0752022-12-22T04:19:42ZengBMCHuman Genomics1479-73642018-07-0112111110.1186/s40246-018-0168-0A new bioinformatics tool to help assess the significance of BRCA1 variantsIsabelle Cusin0Daniel Teixeira1Monique Zahn-Zabal2Valentine Rech de Laval3Anne Gleizes4Valeria Viassolo5Pierre O. Chappuis6Pierre Hutter7Amos Bairoch8Pascale Gaudet9CALIPHO group, SIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsCALIPHO group, SIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsCALIPHO group, SIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsCALIPHO group, SIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsCALIPHO group, SIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsOncogenetics and Cancer Prevention Unit, Division of Oncology, University Hospitals of GenevaOncogenetics and Cancer Prevention Unit, Division of Oncology, University Hospitals of GenevaSophia GeneticsCALIPHO group, SIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsCALIPHO group, SIB Swiss Institute of BioinformaticsAbstract Background Germline pathogenic variants in the breast cancer type 1 susceptibility gene BRCA1 are associated with a 60% lifetime risk for breast and ovarian cancer. This overall risk estimate is for all BRCA1 variants; obviously, not all variants confer the same risk of developing a disease. In cancer patients, loss of BRCA1 function in tumor tissue has been associated with an increased sensitivity to platinum agents and to poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. For clinical management of both at-risk individuals and cancer patients, it would be important that each identified genetic variant be associated with clinical significance. Unfortunately for the vast majority of variants, the clinical impact is unknown. The availability of results from studies assessing the impact of variants on protein function may provide insight of crucial importance. Results and conclusion We have collected, curated, and structured the molecular and cellular phenotypic impact of 3654 distinct BRCA1 variants. The data was modeled in triple format, using the variant as a subject, the studied function as the object, and a predicate describing the relation between the two. Each annotation is supported by a fully traceable evidence. The data was captured using standard ontologies to ensure consistency, and enhance searchability and interoperability. We have assessed the extent to which functional defects at the molecular and cellular levels correlate with the clinical interpretation of variants by ClinVar submitters. Approximately 30% of the ClinVar BRCA1 missense variants have some molecular or cellular assay available in the literature. Pathogenic variants (as assigned by ClinVar) have at least some significant functional defect in 94% of testable cases. For benign variants, 77% of ClinVar benign variants, for which neXtProt Cancer variant portal has data, shows either no or mild experimental functional defects. While this does not provide evidence for clinical interpretation of variants, it may provide some guidance for variants of unknown significance, in the absence of more reliable data. The neXtProt Cancer variant portal (https://www.nextprot.org/portals/breast-cancer) contains over 6300 observations at the molecular and/or cellular level for BRCA1 variants.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40246-018-0168-0BRCA1Genetic variantsMolecular phenotypesFunctional defect assessmentBiological databaseCancer
spellingShingle Isabelle Cusin
Daniel Teixeira
Monique Zahn-Zabal
Valentine Rech de Laval
Anne Gleizes
Valeria Viassolo
Pierre O. Chappuis
Pierre Hutter
Amos Bairoch
Pascale Gaudet
A new bioinformatics tool to help assess the significance of BRCA1 variants
Human Genomics
BRCA1
Genetic variants
Molecular phenotypes
Functional defect assessment
Biological database
Cancer
title A new bioinformatics tool to help assess the significance of BRCA1 variants
title_full A new bioinformatics tool to help assess the significance of BRCA1 variants
title_fullStr A new bioinformatics tool to help assess the significance of BRCA1 variants
title_full_unstemmed A new bioinformatics tool to help assess the significance of BRCA1 variants
title_short A new bioinformatics tool to help assess the significance of BRCA1 variants
title_sort new bioinformatics tool to help assess the significance of brca1 variants
topic BRCA1
Genetic variants
Molecular phenotypes
Functional defect assessment
Biological database
Cancer
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40246-018-0168-0
work_keys_str_mv AT isabellecusin anewbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT danielteixeira anewbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT moniquezahnzabal anewbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT valentinerechdelaval anewbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT annegleizes anewbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT valeriaviassolo anewbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT pierreochappuis anewbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT pierrehutter anewbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT amosbairoch anewbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT pascalegaudet anewbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT isabellecusin newbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT danielteixeira newbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT moniquezahnzabal newbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT valentinerechdelaval newbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT annegleizes newbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT valeriaviassolo newbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT pierreochappuis newbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT pierrehutter newbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT amosbairoch newbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants
AT pascalegaudet newbioinformaticstooltohelpassessthesignificanceofbrca1variants