Stacked: In Their Favour? The Complexities of Fuel Stacking and Cooking Transitions in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Zambia

It remains unclear whether the decision to cook with both polluting and cleaner-burning fuels (‘fuel stacking’) serves as a transition phase towards the full adoption of clean-cooking practices, or whether stacking allows households to enhance fuel security and choose from a variety of cooking techn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Price, Melinda Barnard-Tallier, Karin Troncoso
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4457
_version_ 1797525633098579968
author Martin Price
Melinda Barnard-Tallier
Karin Troncoso
author_facet Martin Price
Melinda Barnard-Tallier
Karin Troncoso
author_sort Martin Price
collection DOAJ
description It remains unclear whether the decision to cook with both polluting and cleaner-burning fuels (‘fuel stacking’) serves as a transition phase towards the full adoption of clean-cooking practices, or whether stacking allows households to enhance fuel security and choose from a variety of cooking technologies and processes. This paper offers a unique contribution to the debate by positioning fuel stacking as the central research question in the exploration of existing household survey data. This research analyses the World Bank’s Multi-Tier Framework survey data concerning energy access and cooking practices in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Zambia. Its novel approach uses fuel expenditure data to group urban households according to the intensity of biomass consumption (wood, charcoal) relative to modern fuel consumption (electricity, gas). The research explores how different fuel-stacking contexts are associated with factors related to household finances, composition, experiences of electricity, and attitudes towards modern fuels. This study shows the diversity of characteristics and behaviours associated with fuel stacking in urban contexts, thus demonstrating the need for fuel stacking to feature prominently in future data collection activities. The paper ends with five key recommendations for further research into fuel stacking and its role in clean-cooking transitions.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T09:16:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-349e535f8dc04d1380ed3d6dbef39039
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T09:16:48Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-349e535f8dc04d1380ed3d6dbef390392023-11-22T05:33:12ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-07-011415445710.3390/en14154457Stacked: In Their Favour? The Complexities of Fuel Stacking and Cooking Transitions in Cambodia, Myanmar, and ZambiaMartin Price0Melinda Barnard-Tallier1Karin Troncoso2Gamos, Reading RG1 4LS, UKGamos, Reading RG1 4LS, UKGeography and Environment, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UKIt remains unclear whether the decision to cook with both polluting and cleaner-burning fuels (‘fuel stacking’) serves as a transition phase towards the full adoption of clean-cooking practices, or whether stacking allows households to enhance fuel security and choose from a variety of cooking technologies and processes. This paper offers a unique contribution to the debate by positioning fuel stacking as the central research question in the exploration of existing household survey data. This research analyses the World Bank’s Multi-Tier Framework survey data concerning energy access and cooking practices in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Zambia. Its novel approach uses fuel expenditure data to group urban households according to the intensity of biomass consumption (wood, charcoal) relative to modern fuel consumption (electricity, gas). The research explores how different fuel-stacking contexts are associated with factors related to household finances, composition, experiences of electricity, and attitudes towards modern fuels. This study shows the diversity of characteristics and behaviours associated with fuel stacking in urban contexts, thus demonstrating the need for fuel stacking to feature prominently in future data collection activities. The paper ends with five key recommendations for further research into fuel stacking and its role in clean-cooking transitions.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4457fuel stackingclean cookingelectric cookingurbancultureperceptions
spellingShingle Martin Price
Melinda Barnard-Tallier
Karin Troncoso
Stacked: In Their Favour? The Complexities of Fuel Stacking and Cooking Transitions in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Zambia
Energies
fuel stacking
clean cooking
electric cooking
urban
culture
perceptions
title Stacked: In Their Favour? The Complexities of Fuel Stacking and Cooking Transitions in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Zambia
title_full Stacked: In Their Favour? The Complexities of Fuel Stacking and Cooking Transitions in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Zambia
title_fullStr Stacked: In Their Favour? The Complexities of Fuel Stacking and Cooking Transitions in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Zambia
title_full_unstemmed Stacked: In Their Favour? The Complexities of Fuel Stacking and Cooking Transitions in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Zambia
title_short Stacked: In Their Favour? The Complexities of Fuel Stacking and Cooking Transitions in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Zambia
title_sort stacked in their favour the complexities of fuel stacking and cooking transitions in cambodia myanmar and zambia
topic fuel stacking
clean cooking
electric cooking
urban
culture
perceptions
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/15/4457
work_keys_str_mv AT martinprice stackedintheirfavourthecomplexitiesoffuelstackingandcookingtransitionsincambodiamyanmarandzambia
AT melindabarnardtallier stackedintheirfavourthecomplexitiesoffuelstackingandcookingtransitionsincambodiamyanmarandzambia
AT karintroncoso stackedintheirfavourthecomplexitiesoffuelstackingandcookingtransitionsincambodiamyanmarandzambia