Deindustrialization and Urban Shrinkage in Romania. What Lessons for the Spatial Policy?

<p>After remodeling the economies of the Western world all along the 1980s, deindustrialization abruptly hit the former socialist countries in the early 1990s. Deindustrialization with destructuring meant the disintegration of the economic structure and industrial cities, and regions entered a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Claudia POPESCU
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca 2014-06-01
Series:Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/97
_version_ 1797262772971503616
author Claudia POPESCU
author_facet Claudia POPESCU
author_sort Claudia POPESCU
collection DOAJ
description <p>After remodeling the economies of the Western world all along the 1980s, deindustrialization abruptly hit the former socialist countries in the early 1990s. Deindustrialization with destructuring meant the disintegration of the economic structure and industrial cities, and regions entered a downsizing spiral of population loss after the breakdown of traditional industries, outmigration and suburbanization. Post-socialist Europe forms a new ‘pole of shrinkage’. Set within the regional context, deindustrialization and urban shrinkage show a solid cause-effect relationship in the Romanian case. The industrial change of cities creates a pattern of uneven growth which stays at the core of understanding the emerging urban shrinkage. The paper finds out that 122 out of 260 towns had an above average Location Quotient (LQ) of industrial employment in 1992 and about 5 million urban dwellers were under the threat of forthcoming deindustrialization. Towns of all demographic sizes were above average industrialized but mostly were medium-small and medium-big towns. They lost more than one quarter of the 1992 population number, significantly higher than in towns with below average LQ of industrial employment. At a large extent, the mix of urban, regional and industrial policies failed to reduce the social costs of deindustrialization. The policy response of spatial strategies, while avoiding the ‘one size fits all’ perspective, should be focused on placebased approach and should be built on economic diversification, complementarity and cooperation within the specific territorial context of small and medium-sized towns.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-11T11:48:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-34ab09e6dd2f4274895eb526b27dd356
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1842-2845
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T00:02:26Z
publishDate 2014-06-01
publisher Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca
record_format Article
series Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
spelling doaj.art-34ab09e6dd2f4274895eb526b27dd3562024-03-14T07:28:33ZengBabes-Bolyai University, Cluj-NapocaTransylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences1842-28452014-06-011042181202113Deindustrialization and Urban Shrinkage in Romania. What Lessons for the Spatial Policy?Claudia POPESCU0Professor, Department of Tourism and Geography, Faculty of Commerce, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania Researcher, Institute of Geography, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania<p>After remodeling the economies of the Western world all along the 1980s, deindustrialization abruptly hit the former socialist countries in the early 1990s. Deindustrialization with destructuring meant the disintegration of the economic structure and industrial cities, and regions entered a downsizing spiral of population loss after the breakdown of traditional industries, outmigration and suburbanization. Post-socialist Europe forms a new ‘pole of shrinkage’. Set within the regional context, deindustrialization and urban shrinkage show a solid cause-effect relationship in the Romanian case. The industrial change of cities creates a pattern of uneven growth which stays at the core of understanding the emerging urban shrinkage. The paper finds out that 122 out of 260 towns had an above average Location Quotient (LQ) of industrial employment in 1992 and about 5 million urban dwellers were under the threat of forthcoming deindustrialization. Towns of all demographic sizes were above average industrialized but mostly were medium-small and medium-big towns. They lost more than one quarter of the 1992 population number, significantly higher than in towns with below average LQ of industrial employment. At a large extent, the mix of urban, regional and industrial policies failed to reduce the social costs of deindustrialization. The policy response of spatial strategies, while avoiding the ‘one size fits all’ perspective, should be focused on placebased approach and should be built on economic diversification, complementarity and cooperation within the specific territorial context of small and medium-sized towns.</p>https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/97romaniadeindustrializationsocial costs of deindustrializationshrinking citiesspatial policy
spellingShingle Claudia POPESCU
Deindustrialization and Urban Shrinkage in Romania. What Lessons for the Spatial Policy?
Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences
romania
deindustrialization
social costs of deindustrialization
shrinking cities
spatial policy
title Deindustrialization and Urban Shrinkage in Romania. What Lessons for the Spatial Policy?
title_full Deindustrialization and Urban Shrinkage in Romania. What Lessons for the Spatial Policy?
title_fullStr Deindustrialization and Urban Shrinkage in Romania. What Lessons for the Spatial Policy?
title_full_unstemmed Deindustrialization and Urban Shrinkage in Romania. What Lessons for the Spatial Policy?
title_short Deindustrialization and Urban Shrinkage in Romania. What Lessons for the Spatial Policy?
title_sort deindustrialization and urban shrinkage in romania what lessons for the spatial policy
topic romania
deindustrialization
social costs of deindustrialization
shrinking cities
spatial policy
url https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/97
work_keys_str_mv AT claudiapopescu deindustrializationandurbanshrinkageinromaniawhatlessonsforthespatialpolicy