Health risk assessment of chemical substances in drinking water in Shijiazhuang from 2014 to 2021

BackgroundA variety of substances in drinking water are hazardous to human health and there are health risks associated with ingestion of these substances via drinking water. ObjectiveTo assess the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risks of drinking water in Shijiazhuang from 2014 to 2021. Me...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hui WANG, Weiwei FAN, Ruiting WU, Yujie NIU, Fengge CHEN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Editorial Committee of Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine 2023-08-01
Series:环境与职业医学
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jeom.org/article/cn/10.11836/JEOM22512
_version_ 1827856967939391488
author Hui WANG
Weiwei FAN
Ruiting WU
Yujie NIU
Fengge CHEN
author_facet Hui WANG
Weiwei FAN
Ruiting WU
Yujie NIU
Fengge CHEN
author_sort Hui WANG
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundA variety of substances in drinking water are hazardous to human health and there are health risks associated with ingestion of these substances via drinking water. ObjectiveTo assess the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risks of drinking water in Shijiazhuang from 2014 to 2021. MethodsThe collection, preservation, and testing of 10529 drinking water samples (including finished water and tap water) in Shijiazhuang were conducted from 2014 to 2021 and followed the Standard examination methods for drinking water (GB/T 5750—2006). The health risks of 15 chemicals in drinking water by oral exposure were assessed using the US Environmental Protection Agency's four-step method combined with Monte Carlo simulation. ResultsAmong the 15 chemicals in drinking water assessed for their health risks at general exposure levels and high exposure levels via oral route in Shijiazhuang from 2014 to 2021, the leading three chemicals and related values of carcinogenic risks for adults were cadmium (1.11×10−4, 2.98×10−4), arsenic (5.88×10−5, 1.56×10−4), and chromium (5.48×10−5, 2.41×10−4), and the leading three chemicals and related values of non-carcinogenic risks were fluoride (3.57×10−1, 6.57×10−1), arsenic (1.31×10−1, 3.47×10−1), and nitrate (1.14×10−1, 5.98×10−1). The health risk values of trichloromethane and aluminum were elevated but still in acceptable ranges. Drinking water-associated health risk values were higher in males than in females, such as the cancer risk for general exposure levels of arsenic in men was 5.76×10−5, compared to 5.72×10−5 in women. The health risk values of cadmium, chromium, fluoride, nitrate, and other chemicals in ground water were higher than those of surface water, and the health risk values of trichloromethane and carbon tetrachloride were lower than those in surface water, such as the non-carcinogenic risk value for general exposure levels of fluoride in groundwater was 3.61×10−1, compared to 2.27×10−1 in surface water. Factors such as water transmission and distribution links, water period, and season affected the health risks of drinking water. The general exposure levels of trichloromethane in tap water had a higher carcinogenic risk of 1.75×10−7 compared with 8.17×10−8 in finished water. The general levels of arsenic exposure was higher in the dry season at 1.36×10−1, compared with 1.26×10−1 in the wet season. ConclusionExcept that the carcinogenic risk of cadmium at general exposure levels in Shijiazhuang exceeds the maximum acceptable range recommended by US Environmental Protection Agency, the health risk values of the remaining 14 chemicals are below the maximum acceptable risk. The carcinogenic risk values of arsenic and chromium and the non-carcinogenic risk values of fluoride, arsenic, and nitrate are relatively high, but do not exceed the maximum acceptable ranges. The emphasis should be on the management of drinking water in highly exposed areas and populations.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:33:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-34b8371a301f4fb584895c6c6a7b7d41
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2095-9982
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:33:48Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Editorial Committee of Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine
record_format Article
series 环境与职业医学
spelling doaj.art-34b8371a301f4fb584895c6c6a7b7d412023-08-29T05:26:42ZengEditorial Committee of Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine环境与职业医学2095-99822023-08-0140894294910.11836/JEOM2251222512Health risk assessment of chemical substances in drinking water in Shijiazhuang from 2014 to 2021Hui WANG0Weiwei FAN1Ruiting WU2Yujie NIU3Fengge CHEN4Environmental Health Institute, Shijiazhuang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, ChinaEnvironmental Health Institute, Shijiazhuang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, ChinaEnvironmental Health Institute, Shijiazhuang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, ChinaDeportment of Occupational Health and Environmental Health/Hebei Key Laboratory of Environment and Human Health, School of Public Health, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050017, ChinaEnvironmental Health Institute, Shijiazhuang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050011, ChinaBackgroundA variety of substances in drinking water are hazardous to human health and there are health risks associated with ingestion of these substances via drinking water. ObjectiveTo assess the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risks of drinking water in Shijiazhuang from 2014 to 2021. MethodsThe collection, preservation, and testing of 10529 drinking water samples (including finished water and tap water) in Shijiazhuang were conducted from 2014 to 2021 and followed the Standard examination methods for drinking water (GB/T 5750—2006). The health risks of 15 chemicals in drinking water by oral exposure were assessed using the US Environmental Protection Agency's four-step method combined with Monte Carlo simulation. ResultsAmong the 15 chemicals in drinking water assessed for their health risks at general exposure levels and high exposure levels via oral route in Shijiazhuang from 2014 to 2021, the leading three chemicals and related values of carcinogenic risks for adults were cadmium (1.11×10−4, 2.98×10−4), arsenic (5.88×10−5, 1.56×10−4), and chromium (5.48×10−5, 2.41×10−4), and the leading three chemicals and related values of non-carcinogenic risks were fluoride (3.57×10−1, 6.57×10−1), arsenic (1.31×10−1, 3.47×10−1), and nitrate (1.14×10−1, 5.98×10−1). The health risk values of trichloromethane and aluminum were elevated but still in acceptable ranges. Drinking water-associated health risk values were higher in males than in females, such as the cancer risk for general exposure levels of arsenic in men was 5.76×10−5, compared to 5.72×10−5 in women. The health risk values of cadmium, chromium, fluoride, nitrate, and other chemicals in ground water were higher than those of surface water, and the health risk values of trichloromethane and carbon tetrachloride were lower than those in surface water, such as the non-carcinogenic risk value for general exposure levels of fluoride in groundwater was 3.61×10−1, compared to 2.27×10−1 in surface water. Factors such as water transmission and distribution links, water period, and season affected the health risks of drinking water. The general exposure levels of trichloromethane in tap water had a higher carcinogenic risk of 1.75×10−7 compared with 8.17×10−8 in finished water. The general levels of arsenic exposure was higher in the dry season at 1.36×10−1, compared with 1.26×10−1 in the wet season. ConclusionExcept that the carcinogenic risk of cadmium at general exposure levels in Shijiazhuang exceeds the maximum acceptable range recommended by US Environmental Protection Agency, the health risk values of the remaining 14 chemicals are below the maximum acceptable risk. The carcinogenic risk values of arsenic and chromium and the non-carcinogenic risk values of fluoride, arsenic, and nitrate are relatively high, but do not exceed the maximum acceptable ranges. The emphasis should be on the management of drinking water in highly exposed areas and populations.http://www.jeom.org/article/cn/10.11836/JEOM22512drinking waterhealth risk assessmentcarcinogenic risknon-carcinogenic riskmonte carlo simulation
spellingShingle Hui WANG
Weiwei FAN
Ruiting WU
Yujie NIU
Fengge CHEN
Health risk assessment of chemical substances in drinking water in Shijiazhuang from 2014 to 2021
环境与职业医学
drinking water
health risk assessment
carcinogenic risk
non-carcinogenic risk
monte carlo simulation
title Health risk assessment of chemical substances in drinking water in Shijiazhuang from 2014 to 2021
title_full Health risk assessment of chemical substances in drinking water in Shijiazhuang from 2014 to 2021
title_fullStr Health risk assessment of chemical substances in drinking water in Shijiazhuang from 2014 to 2021
title_full_unstemmed Health risk assessment of chemical substances in drinking water in Shijiazhuang from 2014 to 2021
title_short Health risk assessment of chemical substances in drinking water in Shijiazhuang from 2014 to 2021
title_sort health risk assessment of chemical substances in drinking water in shijiazhuang from 2014 to 2021
topic drinking water
health risk assessment
carcinogenic risk
non-carcinogenic risk
monte carlo simulation
url http://www.jeom.org/article/cn/10.11836/JEOM22512
work_keys_str_mv AT huiwang healthriskassessmentofchemicalsubstancesindrinkingwaterinshijiazhuangfrom2014to2021
AT weiweifan healthriskassessmentofchemicalsubstancesindrinkingwaterinshijiazhuangfrom2014to2021
AT ruitingwu healthriskassessmentofchemicalsubstancesindrinkingwaterinshijiazhuangfrom2014to2021
AT yujieniu healthriskassessmentofchemicalsubstancesindrinkingwaterinshijiazhuangfrom2014to2021
AT fenggechen healthriskassessmentofchemicalsubstancesindrinkingwaterinshijiazhuangfrom2014to2021