Influence of Different Extraction Methods on Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Nonnea lutea

Background and purpose: No reports are found on biological activities of Nonea lutea (boraginaceae). The aim of this study was to investigate the antioxidant and antibacterial activities of this plant. Materials and methods: The aerial parts were extracted by three different methods, i.e. meceration...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Babak Babakhani, Fatemeh Janbaz, Mohammad Ali Ebrahimzadeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-9755-en.html
_version_ 1797943767297163264
author Babak Babakhani
Fatemeh Janbaz
Mohammad Ali Ebrahimzadeh
author_facet Babak Babakhani
Fatemeh Janbaz
Mohammad Ali Ebrahimzadeh
author_sort Babak Babakhani
collection DOAJ
description Background and purpose: No reports are found on biological activities of Nonea lutea (boraginaceae). The aim of this study was to investigate the antioxidant and antibacterial activities of this plant. Materials and methods: The aerial parts were extracted by three different methods, i.e. meceration (MA), ultrasonic assisted (US), and soxhlet assisted (SO) extractions with methanol. Antioxidative capacity was assessed by utilizing four methods: DPPH and nitric oxide (NO) free radicals scavenging, reducing power and iron chelating activity. The total phenolic and flavonoid contents were also determined. Antibacterial activities were evaluated by disc diffusion method against four bacteria. Results: The highest amount of total phenolic and flavonoid contents were found in SO and US extracts, respectively. In DPPH radical scavenging activity, SO extract (IC50 = 99.14 ± 0.3 µg ml-1) had a higher activity which was significantly different from that of other extracts (P< 0.01). In reducing power, the extracts showed similar activities (P>0.05). The extracts showed weak iron chelating and nitric oxide radical scavenging activities indicating no significant differences (P> 0.05). Findings showed that all extracts had the highest activity against B. subtilis and the least activity against S. aureus. SO extract showed the highest activity against B. subtilis, US extract showed the highest activity against E coli and P. aeruginosa, and MA extract showed the highest activity against S. aureus. Conclusion: The results indicated that extraction methods significantly affect antioxidant and antibacterial capacities and total phenolic and flavonoid contents. For this plant, SO extraction method was found to be more efficient.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T20:28:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-34cd189b7f8d487bbdfe0e8e55ead56c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-9260
1735-9279
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T20:28:22Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-34cd189b7f8d487bbdfe0e8e55ead56c2023-01-25T07:42:30ZengMazandaran University of Medical SciencesJournal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences1735-92601735-92792018-01-0127156129145Influence of Different Extraction Methods on Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Nonnea luteaBabak Babakhani0Fatemeh Janbaz1Mohammad Ali Ebrahimzadeh2 Background and purpose: No reports are found on biological activities of Nonea lutea (boraginaceae). The aim of this study was to investigate the antioxidant and antibacterial activities of this plant. Materials and methods: The aerial parts were extracted by three different methods, i.e. meceration (MA), ultrasonic assisted (US), and soxhlet assisted (SO) extractions with methanol. Antioxidative capacity was assessed by utilizing four methods: DPPH and nitric oxide (NO) free radicals scavenging, reducing power and iron chelating activity. The total phenolic and flavonoid contents were also determined. Antibacterial activities were evaluated by disc diffusion method against four bacteria. Results: The highest amount of total phenolic and flavonoid contents were found in SO and US extracts, respectively. In DPPH radical scavenging activity, SO extract (IC50 = 99.14 ± 0.3 µg ml-1) had a higher activity which was significantly different from that of other extracts (P< 0.01). In reducing power, the extracts showed similar activities (P>0.05). The extracts showed weak iron chelating and nitric oxide radical scavenging activities indicating no significant differences (P> 0.05). Findings showed that all extracts had the highest activity against B. subtilis and the least activity against S. aureus. SO extract showed the highest activity against B. subtilis, US extract showed the highest activity against E coli and P. aeruginosa, and MA extract showed the highest activity against S. aureus. Conclusion: The results indicated that extraction methods significantly affect antioxidant and antibacterial capacities and total phenolic and flavonoid contents. For this plant, SO extraction method was found to be more efficient.http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-9755-en.htmlnonnea luteaboraginaceaeantibacterialdisc diffusion methodextraction methodphenolflavonoid
spellingShingle Babak Babakhani
Fatemeh Janbaz
Mohammad Ali Ebrahimzadeh
Influence of Different Extraction Methods on Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Nonnea lutea
Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
nonnea lutea
boraginaceae
antibacterial
disc diffusion method
extraction method
phenol
flavonoid
title Influence of Different Extraction Methods on Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Nonnea lutea
title_full Influence of Different Extraction Methods on Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Nonnea lutea
title_fullStr Influence of Different Extraction Methods on Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Nonnea lutea
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Different Extraction Methods on Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Nonnea lutea
title_short Influence of Different Extraction Methods on Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Nonnea lutea
title_sort influence of different extraction methods on antioxidant and antibacterial activities of nonnea lutea
topic nonnea lutea
boraginaceae
antibacterial
disc diffusion method
extraction method
phenol
flavonoid
url http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-9755-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT babakbabakhani influenceofdifferentextractionmethodsonantioxidantandantibacterialactivitiesofnonnealutea
AT fatemehjanbaz influenceofdifferentextractionmethodsonantioxidantandantibacterialactivitiesofnonnealutea
AT mohammadaliebrahimzadeh influenceofdifferentextractionmethodsonantioxidantandantibacterialactivitiesofnonnealutea