Influence of Inherent Surface and Internal Defects on Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V Alloy: Comparison between Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting

Additive manufacture (AM) appears to be the most suitable technology to produce sophisticated, high quality, lightweight parts from Ti6Al4V alloy. However, the fatigue life of AM parts is of concern. In our study, we focused on a comparison of two techniques of additive manufacture—selective laser m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michaela Fousová, Dalibor Vojtěch, Karel Doubrava, Matěj Daniel, Chiu-Feng Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-03-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/11/4/537
_version_ 1811225360983916544
author Michaela Fousová
Dalibor Vojtěch
Karel Doubrava
Matěj Daniel
Chiu-Feng Lin
author_facet Michaela Fousová
Dalibor Vojtěch
Karel Doubrava
Matěj Daniel
Chiu-Feng Lin
author_sort Michaela Fousová
collection DOAJ
description Additive manufacture (AM) appears to be the most suitable technology to produce sophisticated, high quality, lightweight parts from Ti6Al4V alloy. However, the fatigue life of AM parts is of concern. In our study, we focused on a comparison of two techniques of additive manufacture—selective laser melting (SLM) and electron beam melting (EBM)—in terms of the mechanical properties during both static and dynamic loading. All of the samples were untreated to focus on the influence of surface condition inherent to SLM and EBM. The EBM samples were studied in the as-built state, while SLM was followed by heat treatment. The resulting similarity of microstructures led to comparable mechanical properties in tension, but, due to differences in surface roughness and specific internal defects, the fatigue strength of the EBM samples reached only half the value of the SLM samples. Higher surface roughness that is inherent to EBM contributed to multiple initiations of fatigue cracks, while only one crack initiated on the SLM surface. Also, facets that were formed by an intergranular cleavage fracture were observed in the EBM samples.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T09:05:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-34dbef4391eb435e801aa2af2e1357ea
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1944
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T09:05:45Z
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Materials
spelling doaj.art-34dbef4391eb435e801aa2af2e1357ea2022-12-22T03:39:06ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442018-03-0111453710.3390/ma11040537ma11040537Influence of Inherent Surface and Internal Defects on Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V Alloy: Comparison between Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam MeltingMichaela Fousová0Dalibor Vojtěch1Karel Doubrava2Matěj Daniel3Chiu-Feng Lin4Department of Metals and Corrosion Engineering, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Metals and Corrosion Engineering, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Mechanics, Biomechanics and Mechatronics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Zikova 1903, 166 36 Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Mechanics, Biomechanics and Mechatronics, Czech Technical University in Prague, Zikova 1903, 166 36 Prague, Czech RepublicMetal Industries Research & Development Centre, Kaonan Highway 1101, 811 60 Kaohsiung, TaiwanAdditive manufacture (AM) appears to be the most suitable technology to produce sophisticated, high quality, lightweight parts from Ti6Al4V alloy. However, the fatigue life of AM parts is of concern. In our study, we focused on a comparison of two techniques of additive manufacture—selective laser melting (SLM) and electron beam melting (EBM)—in terms of the mechanical properties during both static and dynamic loading. All of the samples were untreated to focus on the influence of surface condition inherent to SLM and EBM. The EBM samples were studied in the as-built state, while SLM was followed by heat treatment. The resulting similarity of microstructures led to comparable mechanical properties in tension, but, due to differences in surface roughness and specific internal defects, the fatigue strength of the EBM samples reached only half the value of the SLM samples. Higher surface roughness that is inherent to EBM contributed to multiple initiations of fatigue cracks, while only one crack initiated on the SLM surface. Also, facets that were formed by an intergranular cleavage fracture were observed in the EBM samples.http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/11/4/537Ti6Al4Vselective laser meltingelectron beam meltingmechanical propertiesfatigue
spellingShingle Michaela Fousová
Dalibor Vojtěch
Karel Doubrava
Matěj Daniel
Chiu-Feng Lin
Influence of Inherent Surface and Internal Defects on Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V Alloy: Comparison between Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting
Materials
Ti6Al4V
selective laser melting
electron beam melting
mechanical properties
fatigue
title Influence of Inherent Surface and Internal Defects on Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V Alloy: Comparison between Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting
title_full Influence of Inherent Surface and Internal Defects on Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V Alloy: Comparison between Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting
title_fullStr Influence of Inherent Surface and Internal Defects on Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V Alloy: Comparison between Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Inherent Surface and Internal Defects on Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V Alloy: Comparison between Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting
title_short Influence of Inherent Surface and Internal Defects on Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V Alloy: Comparison between Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting
title_sort influence of inherent surface and internal defects on mechanical properties of additively manufactured ti6al4v alloy comparison between selective laser melting and electron beam melting
topic Ti6Al4V
selective laser melting
electron beam melting
mechanical properties
fatigue
url http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/11/4/537
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelafousova influenceofinherentsurfaceandinternaldefectsonmechanicalpropertiesofadditivelymanufacturedti6al4valloycomparisonbetweenselectivelasermeltingandelectronbeammelting
AT daliborvojtech influenceofinherentsurfaceandinternaldefectsonmechanicalpropertiesofadditivelymanufacturedti6al4valloycomparisonbetweenselectivelasermeltingandelectronbeammelting
AT kareldoubrava influenceofinherentsurfaceandinternaldefectsonmechanicalpropertiesofadditivelymanufacturedti6al4valloycomparisonbetweenselectivelasermeltingandelectronbeammelting
AT matejdaniel influenceofinherentsurfaceandinternaldefectsonmechanicalpropertiesofadditivelymanufacturedti6al4valloycomparisonbetweenselectivelasermeltingandelectronbeammelting
AT chiufenglin influenceofinherentsurfaceandinternaldefectsonmechanicalpropertiesofadditivelymanufacturedti6al4valloycomparisonbetweenselectivelasermeltingandelectronbeammelting