Placental pathology reports: A qualitative study in a US university hospital setting on perceived clinical utility and areas for improvement.

<h4>Objective</h4>To explore how placental pathology is currently used by clinicians and what placental information would be most useful in the immediate hours after delivery.<h4>Study design</h4>We used a qualitative study design to conduct in-depth, semi-structured intervie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kelly Gallagher, Jane-Frances C Aruma, Christiana N Oji-Mmuo, Jaimey M Pauli, William M Curtin, Jeffery A Goldstein, Heather L Stuckey, Alison D Gernand
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286294
_version_ 1797394399350489088
author Kelly Gallagher
Jane-Frances C Aruma
Christiana N Oji-Mmuo
Jaimey M Pauli
William M Curtin
Jeffery A Goldstein
Heather L Stuckey
Alison D Gernand
author_facet Kelly Gallagher
Jane-Frances C Aruma
Christiana N Oji-Mmuo
Jaimey M Pauli
William M Curtin
Jeffery A Goldstein
Heather L Stuckey
Alison D Gernand
author_sort Kelly Gallagher
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objective</h4>To explore how placental pathology is currently used by clinicians and what placental information would be most useful in the immediate hours after delivery.<h4>Study design</h4>We used a qualitative study design to conduct in-depth, semi-structured interviews with obstetric and neonatal clinicians who provide delivery or postpartum care at an academic medical center in the US (n = 19). Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using descriptive content analysis.<h4>Results</h4>Clinicians valued placental pathology information yet cited multiple barriers that prevent the consistent use of pathology. Four main themes were identified. First, the placenta is sent to pathology for consistent reasons, however, the pathology report is accessed by clinicians inconsistently due to key barriers: difficult to find in the electronic medical record, understand, and get quickly. Second, clinicians value placental pathology for explanatory capability as well as for contributions to current and future care, particularly when there is fetal growth restriction, stillbirth, or antibiotic use. Third, a rapid placental exam (specifically including placental weight, infection, infarction, and overall assessment) would be helpful in providing clinical care. Fourth, placental pathology reports that connect clinically relevant findings (similar to radiology) and that are written with plain, standardized language and that non-pathologists can more readily understand are preferred.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Placental pathology is important to clinicians that care for mothers and newborns (particularly those that are critically ill) after birth, yet many problems stand in the way of its usefulness. Hospital administrators, perinatal pathologists, and clinicians should work together to improve access to and contents of reports. Support for new methods to provide quick placenta information is warranted.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T00:19:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-34dc1eced7b544ceb0250172a3d25cf3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T00:19:10Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-34dc1eced7b544ceb0250172a3d25cf32023-12-12T05:36:40ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01186e028629410.1371/journal.pone.0286294Placental pathology reports: A qualitative study in a US university hospital setting on perceived clinical utility and areas for improvement.Kelly GallagherJane-Frances C ArumaChristiana N Oji-MmuoJaimey M PauliWilliam M CurtinJeffery A GoldsteinHeather L StuckeyAlison D Gernand<h4>Objective</h4>To explore how placental pathology is currently used by clinicians and what placental information would be most useful in the immediate hours after delivery.<h4>Study design</h4>We used a qualitative study design to conduct in-depth, semi-structured interviews with obstetric and neonatal clinicians who provide delivery or postpartum care at an academic medical center in the US (n = 19). Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using descriptive content analysis.<h4>Results</h4>Clinicians valued placental pathology information yet cited multiple barriers that prevent the consistent use of pathology. Four main themes were identified. First, the placenta is sent to pathology for consistent reasons, however, the pathology report is accessed by clinicians inconsistently due to key barriers: difficult to find in the electronic medical record, understand, and get quickly. Second, clinicians value placental pathology for explanatory capability as well as for contributions to current and future care, particularly when there is fetal growth restriction, stillbirth, or antibiotic use. Third, a rapid placental exam (specifically including placental weight, infection, infarction, and overall assessment) would be helpful in providing clinical care. Fourth, placental pathology reports that connect clinically relevant findings (similar to radiology) and that are written with plain, standardized language and that non-pathologists can more readily understand are preferred.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Placental pathology is important to clinicians that care for mothers and newborns (particularly those that are critically ill) after birth, yet many problems stand in the way of its usefulness. Hospital administrators, perinatal pathologists, and clinicians should work together to improve access to and contents of reports. Support for new methods to provide quick placenta information is warranted.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286294
spellingShingle Kelly Gallagher
Jane-Frances C Aruma
Christiana N Oji-Mmuo
Jaimey M Pauli
William M Curtin
Jeffery A Goldstein
Heather L Stuckey
Alison D Gernand
Placental pathology reports: A qualitative study in a US university hospital setting on perceived clinical utility and areas for improvement.
PLoS ONE
title Placental pathology reports: A qualitative study in a US university hospital setting on perceived clinical utility and areas for improvement.
title_full Placental pathology reports: A qualitative study in a US university hospital setting on perceived clinical utility and areas for improvement.
title_fullStr Placental pathology reports: A qualitative study in a US university hospital setting on perceived clinical utility and areas for improvement.
title_full_unstemmed Placental pathology reports: A qualitative study in a US university hospital setting on perceived clinical utility and areas for improvement.
title_short Placental pathology reports: A qualitative study in a US university hospital setting on perceived clinical utility and areas for improvement.
title_sort placental pathology reports a qualitative study in a us university hospital setting on perceived clinical utility and areas for improvement
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286294
work_keys_str_mv AT kellygallagher placentalpathologyreportsaqualitativestudyinausuniversityhospitalsettingonperceivedclinicalutilityandareasforimprovement
AT janefrancescaruma placentalpathologyreportsaqualitativestudyinausuniversityhospitalsettingonperceivedclinicalutilityandareasforimprovement
AT christiananojimmuo placentalpathologyreportsaqualitativestudyinausuniversityhospitalsettingonperceivedclinicalutilityandareasforimprovement
AT jaimeympauli placentalpathologyreportsaqualitativestudyinausuniversityhospitalsettingonperceivedclinicalutilityandareasforimprovement
AT williammcurtin placentalpathologyreportsaqualitativestudyinausuniversityhospitalsettingonperceivedclinicalutilityandareasforimprovement
AT jefferyagoldstein placentalpathologyreportsaqualitativestudyinausuniversityhospitalsettingonperceivedclinicalutilityandareasforimprovement
AT heatherlstuckey placentalpathologyreportsaqualitativestudyinausuniversityhospitalsettingonperceivedclinicalutilityandareasforimprovement
AT alisondgernand placentalpathologyreportsaqualitativestudyinausuniversityhospitalsettingonperceivedclinicalutilityandareasforimprovement