Removal of Partially Impacted Mandibular Third Molars with and without Flap: A Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques

Objectives: To compare with and without flap removal of partially impacted mandibular third molars in terms of mean pain and mean swelling on the second post-operative day. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and duration of Study: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Armed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naseer Ahmed, Muhammad Nazir Khan, Saad Mahmood, Muhammad Ramzan Adeel, Ammar Yasir, Shahrukh Ahmed Saeed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Army Medical College Rawalpindi 2022-11-01
Series:Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/8382
_version_ 1828119429842468864
author Naseer Ahmed
Muhammad Nazir Khan
Saad Mahmood
Muhammad Ramzan Adeel
Ammar Yasir
Shahrukh Ahmed Saeed
author_facet Naseer Ahmed
Muhammad Nazir Khan
Saad Mahmood
Muhammad Ramzan Adeel
Ammar Yasir
Shahrukh Ahmed Saeed
author_sort Naseer Ahmed
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: To compare with and without flap removal of partially impacted mandibular third molars in terms of mean pain and mean swelling on the second post-operative day. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and duration of Study: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from May to Nov 2021. Methodology: Sixty cases (30 in each Group) with partially impacted mandibular third molar with mesioangular impaction aged 18-45 years were included. Random allocation of patients was done to the removal with flap (Group-A) and without flap (Group-B). On the second post-operative day, the outcome of pain and swelling in patients was measured based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS between 0 to 10 cm points for pain and swelling on a scale of 0 to 3). Results: The mean pain score was 5.67±1.30 in Group-A (with flap) versus 2.97±1.25 in Group-B (without flap) (p-value,<0.001). The mean swelling score was 5.40±1.16 for Group-A (with flap) versus 2.97±1.15 for Group-B (without flap) (p-value,<0.001). Conclusion: The surgical extraction of the partially impacted mesioangular mandibular third molar without buccal flap reflection and bone ostectomy resulted in less post-operative pain and swelling than surgery with buccal flap reflection and bone ostectomy.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T13:48:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-35003f11ec8d42bc90c3863468f03390
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0030-9648
2411-8842
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T13:48:11Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher Army Medical College Rawalpindi
record_format Article
series Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-35003f11ec8d42bc90c3863468f033902022-12-22T04:20:53ZengArmy Medical College RawalpindiPakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal0030-96482411-88422022-11-0172510.51253/pafmj.v72i5.8382Removal of Partially Impacted Mandibular Third Molars with and without Flap: A Comparison of Two Surgical TechniquesNaseer Ahmed0Muhammad Nazir Khan1Saad Mahmood2Muhammad Ramzan Adeel3Ammar Yasir4Shahrukh Ahmed Saeed5Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi PakistanArmed Forces Institute of Dentistry/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi PakistanArmed Forces Institute of Dentistry/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi PakistanArmed Forces Institute of Dentistry/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi PakistanArmed Forces Institute of Dentistry/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi PakistanArmed Forces Institute of Dentistry/National University of Medical Sciences (NUMS), Rawalpindi Pakistan Objectives: To compare with and without flap removal of partially impacted mandibular third molars in terms of mean pain and mean swelling on the second post-operative day. Study Design: Quasi-experimental study. Place and duration of Study: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from May to Nov 2021. Methodology: Sixty cases (30 in each Group) with partially impacted mandibular third molar with mesioangular impaction aged 18-45 years were included. Random allocation of patients was done to the removal with flap (Group-A) and without flap (Group-B). On the second post-operative day, the outcome of pain and swelling in patients was measured based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS between 0 to 10 cm points for pain and swelling on a scale of 0 to 3). Results: The mean pain score was 5.67±1.30 in Group-A (with flap) versus 2.97±1.25 in Group-B (without flap) (p-value,<0.001). The mean swelling score was 5.40±1.16 for Group-A (with flap) versus 2.97±1.15 for Group-B (without flap) (p-value,<0.001). Conclusion: The surgical extraction of the partially impacted mesioangular mandibular third molar without buccal flap reflection and bone ostectomy resulted in less post-operative pain and swelling than surgery with buccal flap reflection and bone ostectomy. https://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/8382Buccal flapPartially impacted mesioangular mandibular third molarPainSwellingThird molar surgery
spellingShingle Naseer Ahmed
Muhammad Nazir Khan
Saad Mahmood
Muhammad Ramzan Adeel
Ammar Yasir
Shahrukh Ahmed Saeed
Removal of Partially Impacted Mandibular Third Molars with and without Flap: A Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Buccal flap
Partially impacted mesioangular mandibular third molar
Pain
Swelling
Third molar surgery
title Removal of Partially Impacted Mandibular Third Molars with and without Flap: A Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques
title_full Removal of Partially Impacted Mandibular Third Molars with and without Flap: A Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques
title_fullStr Removal of Partially Impacted Mandibular Third Molars with and without Flap: A Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Removal of Partially Impacted Mandibular Third Molars with and without Flap: A Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques
title_short Removal of Partially Impacted Mandibular Third Molars with and without Flap: A Comparison of Two Surgical Techniques
title_sort removal of partially impacted mandibular third molars with and without flap a comparison of two surgical techniques
topic Buccal flap
Partially impacted mesioangular mandibular third molar
Pain
Swelling
Third molar surgery
url https://www.pafmj.org/index.php/PAFMJ/article/view/8382
work_keys_str_mv AT naseerahmed removalofpartiallyimpactedmandibularthirdmolarswithandwithoutflapacomparisonoftwosurgicaltechniques
AT muhammadnazirkhan removalofpartiallyimpactedmandibularthirdmolarswithandwithoutflapacomparisonoftwosurgicaltechniques
AT saadmahmood removalofpartiallyimpactedmandibularthirdmolarswithandwithoutflapacomparisonoftwosurgicaltechniques
AT muhammadramzanadeel removalofpartiallyimpactedmandibularthirdmolarswithandwithoutflapacomparisonoftwosurgicaltechniques
AT ammaryasir removalofpartiallyimpactedmandibularthirdmolarswithandwithoutflapacomparisonoftwosurgicaltechniques
AT shahrukhahmedsaeed removalofpartiallyimpactedmandibularthirdmolarswithandwithoutflapacomparisonoftwosurgicaltechniques