Doubt Undogmatized

It has become almost a conventional wisdom to argue that Cartesian scepticism poses a far more radical sceptical threat than its classical Pyrrhonian counterpart. Such a view fails to recognise, however, that there is a species of sceptical concern that can only plausibly be regarded as captured by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Duncan Pritchard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina 2000-12-01
Series:Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/19056/17554
_version_ 1819040564973142016
author Duncan Pritchard
author_facet Duncan Pritchard
author_sort Duncan Pritchard
collection DOAJ
description It has become almost a conventional wisdom to argue that Cartesian scepticism poses a far more radical sceptical threat than its classical Pyrrhonian counterpart. Such a view fails to recognise, however, that there is a species of sceptical concern that can only plausibly be regarded as captured by the Pyrrhonian strategy. For whereas Cartesian scepticism is closely tied to the contentious doctrine of epistemological internalism, it is far from obvious that Pyrrhonian scepticism bears any such theoretical commitments. It is argued here that by viewing the Pyrrhonian style of sceptical argument in terms of this contemporary epistemological externalist/internalist distinction one can gain a new insight into some of the more problematic elements of this variety of classical thought and also get a handle on certain contemporary worries that have been raised regarding the anti-sceptical efficacy of externalist theories of knowledge.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T09:11:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-35042cb04748455887f126748429ea30
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1414-4247
1808-1711
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T09:11:07Z
publishDate 2000-12-01
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
record_format Article
series Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology
spelling doaj.art-35042cb04748455887f126748429ea302022-12-21T19:09:14ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaPrincipia: An International Journal of Epistemology1414-42471808-17112000-12-01042187214Doubt UndogmatizedDuncan PritchardIt has become almost a conventional wisdom to argue that Cartesian scepticism poses a far more radical sceptical threat than its classical Pyrrhonian counterpart. Such a view fails to recognise, however, that there is a species of sceptical concern that can only plausibly be regarded as captured by the Pyrrhonian strategy. For whereas Cartesian scepticism is closely tied to the contentious doctrine of epistemological internalism, it is far from obvious that Pyrrhonian scepticism bears any such theoretical commitments. It is argued here that by viewing the Pyrrhonian style of sceptical argument in terms of this contemporary epistemological externalist/internalist distinction one can gain a new insight into some of the more problematic elements of this variety of classical thought and also get a handle on certain contemporary worries that have been raised regarding the anti-sceptical efficacy of externalist theories of knowledge.http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/19056/17554Cartesian scepticismepistemological externalismmetaepistemological scepticismPyrrhonian skepticism
spellingShingle Duncan Pritchard
Doubt Undogmatized
Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology
Cartesian scepticism
epistemological externalism
metaepistemological scepticism
Pyrrhonian skepticism
title Doubt Undogmatized
title_full Doubt Undogmatized
title_fullStr Doubt Undogmatized
title_full_unstemmed Doubt Undogmatized
title_short Doubt Undogmatized
title_sort doubt undogmatized
topic Cartesian scepticism
epistemological externalism
metaepistemological scepticism
Pyrrhonian skepticism
url http://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/19056/17554
work_keys_str_mv AT duncanpritchard doubtundogmatized