Exploration of the social and philosophical underpinning of ‘the patient’—what this means for people with a long-term condition

Should healthcare professionals use the term ‘patient’? A patient is a social construct, in a biomedical model, in which each actor has their role to play. This model has been criticised as belonging to an era of medical hegemony and (mis)represents an individual seeking healthcare as one who is sim...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. B. Whyte, R. Elias, D. Cooke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Nature 2024-03-01
Series:Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02729-8
_version_ 1797275403091443712
author M. B. Whyte
R. Elias
D. Cooke
author_facet M. B. Whyte
R. Elias
D. Cooke
author_sort M. B. Whyte
collection DOAJ
description Should healthcare professionals use the term ‘patient’? A patient is a social construct, in a biomedical model, in which each actor has their role to play. This model has been criticised as belonging to an era of medical hegemony and (mis)represents an individual seeking healthcare as one who is simply a passive participant and recipient of care. The ‘Language Matters’ campaign, for people living with diabetes, has sought to address the role of language in interactions between healthcare providers. A key point raised in the campaign is whether someone who feels well, but has ongoing healthcare input, should be referred to as a patient? In this article, we address the concept of a patient and how its use can belie a particular mindset (or ‘discourse’) in which power is established in a relationship and can lead to individuals being defined by their condition. However, for some linguistic communities (such as nurses and doctors), a patient may be considered less as one over whom they have dominion, but rather someone for whom they have specific responsibilities and duty of care. Drawing upon the philosophical theories of language—that the meaning and inference of a word is dependent on its use—we argue that the context in which use of the term patient occurs is crucial. Without more fundamental cultural disruption of the biomedical model, word substitution, in itself, will not change perception.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T15:13:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-35056fe279c742f29f060036e8ca9ffa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2662-9992
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T15:13:51Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Springer Nature
record_format Article
series Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
spelling doaj.art-35056fe279c742f29f060036e8ca9ffa2024-03-05T18:00:42ZengSpringer NatureHumanities & Social Sciences Communications2662-99922024-03-011111610.1057/s41599-024-02729-8Exploration of the social and philosophical underpinning of ‘the patient’—what this means for people with a long-term conditionM. B. Whyte0R. Elias1D. Cooke2Dept of Diabetes, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation TrustDept of Nephrology, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation TrustDept of Psychology, University of SurreyShould healthcare professionals use the term ‘patient’? A patient is a social construct, in a biomedical model, in which each actor has their role to play. This model has been criticised as belonging to an era of medical hegemony and (mis)represents an individual seeking healthcare as one who is simply a passive participant and recipient of care. The ‘Language Matters’ campaign, for people living with diabetes, has sought to address the role of language in interactions between healthcare providers. A key point raised in the campaign is whether someone who feels well, but has ongoing healthcare input, should be referred to as a patient? In this article, we address the concept of a patient and how its use can belie a particular mindset (or ‘discourse’) in which power is established in a relationship and can lead to individuals being defined by their condition. However, for some linguistic communities (such as nurses and doctors), a patient may be considered less as one over whom they have dominion, but rather someone for whom they have specific responsibilities and duty of care. Drawing upon the philosophical theories of language—that the meaning and inference of a word is dependent on its use—we argue that the context in which use of the term patient occurs is crucial. Without more fundamental cultural disruption of the biomedical model, word substitution, in itself, will not change perception.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02729-8
spellingShingle M. B. Whyte
R. Elias
D. Cooke
Exploration of the social and philosophical underpinning of ‘the patient’—what this means for people with a long-term condition
Humanities & Social Sciences Communications
title Exploration of the social and philosophical underpinning of ‘the patient’—what this means for people with a long-term condition
title_full Exploration of the social and philosophical underpinning of ‘the patient’—what this means for people with a long-term condition
title_fullStr Exploration of the social and philosophical underpinning of ‘the patient’—what this means for people with a long-term condition
title_full_unstemmed Exploration of the social and philosophical underpinning of ‘the patient’—what this means for people with a long-term condition
title_short Exploration of the social and philosophical underpinning of ‘the patient’—what this means for people with a long-term condition
title_sort exploration of the social and philosophical underpinning of the patient what this means for people with a long term condition
url https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02729-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mbwhyte explorationofthesocialandphilosophicalunderpinningofthepatientwhatthismeansforpeoplewithalongtermcondition
AT relias explorationofthesocialandphilosophicalunderpinningofthepatientwhatthismeansforpeoplewithalongtermcondition
AT dcooke explorationofthesocialandphilosophicalunderpinningofthepatientwhatthismeansforpeoplewithalongtermcondition