Decisional enhancement and autonomy: public attitudes towards overt and covert nudges
Ubiquitous cognitive biases hinder optimal decision making. Recent calls to assist decision makers in mitigating these biases—via interventions commonly called “nudges”—have been criticized as infringing upon individual autonomy. We tested the hypothesis that such “decisional enhancement” programs t...
Main Authors: | Gidon Felsen, Noah Castelo, Peter B. Reiner |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2013-05-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500005933/type/journal_article |
Similar Items
-
Decisional enhancement and autonomy: public attitudes towards overt and covert nudges
by: Gidon Felsen, et al.
Published: (2013-05-01) -
Irrational reactions to negative outcomes : evidence for two conceptual systems/
by: Epstein, Seymour, et al. -
Iran's overt and covert goals of the European
by: ali asghar mostafavi
Published: (1999-11-01) -
Phenomenologically Oriented Vignette: A Narrative Tool for Qualitative Empirical Research
by: Cinzia Zadra, et al.
Published: (2024-04-01) -
A Simple Theory of Overt and Covert Dogwhistles
by: LUCA ALBERTO RAPPUOLI
Published: (2023-12-01)