Austrian and Mainstream Economics on Mathematics – a Comment on Pieniążek (2018): Reply to Machaj.
Machaj’s (2019) interesting comment on my original article (Pieniążek, 2018) makes several points. The major one is that in my discussion of the usefulness of the Austrian School of Economics’ (henceforth: ASE) tool of study, which is praxeology, I have drawn a faulty conclusion about its non-useful...
Main Author: | Piotr Pieniążek |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Polish Economic Society
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Ekonomista |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ekonomista.pte.pl/Austrian-and-Mainstream-Economics-on-Mathematics-a-Comment-on-Pieniazek-2018-Reply,150133,0,2.html |
Similar Items
-
A critical look at the failure of mainstream economics
by: Joseph Dipoli
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Disciplined reasoning: Styles of reasoning and the mainstream-heterodoxy divide in Swedish economics
by: Elisabeth Popp Berman
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Reply to Comment on ‘Are physicists afraid of mathematics?’
by: Jonathan E Kollmer, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01) -
Mainstreams of mathematics /
by: 377622 Fraleigh, John B.
Published: (1969) -
Reply to comments
by: Dzenovska, D
Published: (2014)