A Perfectly Broken Acrostic in Nahum 1?

Responding to recent scholarship which discounts apparent traces of an alphabetic acrostic in Nahum 1 as purely coincidental, this essay argues that earlier scholarship was right to detect a tendency towards an alphabetic acrostic in Nahum 1. But while previously the disruptions to the alphabetic se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thomas Renz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Alberta Library 2010-01-01
Series:Journal of Hebrew Scriptures
Online Access:https://jhsonline.org/index.php/jhs/article/view/7235
_version_ 1797860541099671552
author Thomas Renz
author_facet Thomas Renz
author_sort Thomas Renz
collection DOAJ
description Responding to recent scholarship which discounts apparent traces of an alphabetic acrostic in Nahum 1 as purely coincidental, this essay argues that earlier scholarship was right to detect a tendency towards an alphabetic acrostic in Nahum 1. But while previously the disruptions to the alphabetic sequence were considered an imperfection caused by lack of concern on the part of the poet or a later redactor or as the result of copying mistakes in the transmission of the text, I suggest that the tendency towards an acrostic and the irregularities belong to a single purposeful design. This design communicates a message of disrupted order and fits well with the remainder of the book of Nahum.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T21:47:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-35525c319e844fe79ffca148d94a57da
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1203-1542
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T21:47:32Z
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher University of Alberta Library
record_format Article
series Journal of Hebrew Scriptures
spelling doaj.art-35525c319e844fe79ffca148d94a57da2023-03-24T20:35:01ZengUniversity of Alberta LibraryJournal of Hebrew Scriptures1203-15422010-01-01910.5508/jhs.2009.v9.a23A Perfectly Broken Acrostic in Nahum 1?Thomas RenzResponding to recent scholarship which discounts apparent traces of an alphabetic acrostic in Nahum 1 as purely coincidental, this essay argues that earlier scholarship was right to detect a tendency towards an alphabetic acrostic in Nahum 1. But while previously the disruptions to the alphabetic sequence were considered an imperfection caused by lack of concern on the part of the poet or a later redactor or as the result of copying mistakes in the transmission of the text, I suggest that the tendency towards an acrostic and the irregularities belong to a single purposeful design. This design communicates a message of disrupted order and fits well with the remainder of the book of Nahum.https://jhsonline.org/index.php/jhs/article/view/7235
spellingShingle Thomas Renz
A Perfectly Broken Acrostic in Nahum 1?
Journal of Hebrew Scriptures
title A Perfectly Broken Acrostic in Nahum 1?
title_full A Perfectly Broken Acrostic in Nahum 1?
title_fullStr A Perfectly Broken Acrostic in Nahum 1?
title_full_unstemmed A Perfectly Broken Acrostic in Nahum 1?
title_short A Perfectly Broken Acrostic in Nahum 1?
title_sort perfectly broken acrostic in nahum 1
url https://jhsonline.org/index.php/jhs/article/view/7235
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasrenz aperfectlybrokenacrosticinnahum1
AT thomasrenz perfectlybrokenacrosticinnahum1