Use of protocol and evaluation of postoperative residual curarization incidence in the absence of intraoperative acceleromyography - Randomized clinical trial

Abstract Objective Evaluate the incidence of postoperative residual curarization (PORC) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) after the use of protocol and absence of intraoperative acceleromyography (AMG). Methods Randomized clinical trial with 122 patients allocated into two groups (protocol a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Filipe Nadir Caparica Santos, Angelica de Fátima de Assunção Braga, Carla Josefine Barbosa de Lima Ribeiro, Franklin Sarmento da Silva Braga, Vanessa Henriques Carvalho, Fernando Eduardo Feres Junqueira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
Series:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000600592&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1811274326459023360
author Filipe Nadir Caparica Santos
Angelica de Fátima de Assunção Braga
Carla Josefine Barbosa de Lima Ribeiro
Franklin Sarmento da Silva Braga
Vanessa Henriques Carvalho
Fernando Eduardo Feres Junqueira
author_facet Filipe Nadir Caparica Santos
Angelica de Fátima de Assunção Braga
Carla Josefine Barbosa de Lima Ribeiro
Franklin Sarmento da Silva Braga
Vanessa Henriques Carvalho
Fernando Eduardo Feres Junqueira
author_sort Filipe Nadir Caparica Santos
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective Evaluate the incidence of postoperative residual curarization (PORC) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) after the use of protocol and absence of intraoperative acceleromyography (AMG). Methods Randomized clinical trial with 122 patients allocated into two groups (protocol and control). Protocol group received initial and additional doses of rocuronium (0.6 mg·kg-1 and 10 mg, respectively); the use of rocuronium was avoided in the final 45 min; blockade reversal with neostigmine (50 µg·kg-1); time ≥15 min between reversion and extubation. Control: initial and additional doses of rocuronium, blockade reversal, neostigmine dose, and extubation time, all at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. AMG was used in the PACU and PORC considered at T4/T1 ratio <1.0. Results The incidence of PORC was lower in protocol group than in control group (25% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.02). In control group, total dose of rocuronium was higher in patients with PORC than without PORC (0.43 vs. 0.35 mg·kg-1·h-1, p = 0.03) and the time interval between the last administration of rocuronium and neostigmine was lower (75.0 vs. 101.0 min, p < 0.01). In protocol group, there was no difference regarding the analyzed parameters (with PORC vs. without PORC). Considering the entire study population and the presence or absence of PORC, total dose of rocuronium was higher in patients with PORC (0.42 vs. 0.31 mg·kg-1·h-1, p = 0.01), while the time interval between the last administration of rocuronium and neostigmine was lower (72.5 vs. 99.0 min, p ≤ 0.01). Conclusion The proposed systematization reduced PORC incidence in PACU in the absence of intraoperative AMG.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T23:17:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3578eedf22dc4f62b6fe420f470bf3dc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1806-907X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T23:17:00Z
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia
spelling doaj.art-3578eedf22dc4f62b6fe420f470bf3dc2022-12-22T03:12:39ZengSociedade Brasileira de AnestesiologiaRevista Brasileira de Anestesiologia1806-907X67659259910.1016/j.bjane.2017.02.003S0034-70942017000600592Use of protocol and evaluation of postoperative residual curarization incidence in the absence of intraoperative acceleromyography - Randomized clinical trialFilipe Nadir Caparica SantosAngelica de Fátima de Assunção BragaCarla Josefine Barbosa de Lima RibeiroFranklin Sarmento da Silva BragaVanessa Henriques CarvalhoFernando Eduardo Feres JunqueiraAbstract Objective Evaluate the incidence of postoperative residual curarization (PORC) in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) after the use of protocol and absence of intraoperative acceleromyography (AMG). Methods Randomized clinical trial with 122 patients allocated into two groups (protocol and control). Protocol group received initial and additional doses of rocuronium (0.6 mg·kg-1 and 10 mg, respectively); the use of rocuronium was avoided in the final 45 min; blockade reversal with neostigmine (50 µg·kg-1); time ≥15 min between reversion and extubation. Control: initial and additional doses of rocuronium, blockade reversal, neostigmine dose, and extubation time, all at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. AMG was used in the PACU and PORC considered at T4/T1 ratio <1.0. Results The incidence of PORC was lower in protocol group than in control group (25% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.02). In control group, total dose of rocuronium was higher in patients with PORC than without PORC (0.43 vs. 0.35 mg·kg-1·h-1, p = 0.03) and the time interval between the last administration of rocuronium and neostigmine was lower (75.0 vs. 101.0 min, p < 0.01). In protocol group, there was no difference regarding the analyzed parameters (with PORC vs. without PORC). Considering the entire study population and the presence or absence of PORC, total dose of rocuronium was higher in patients with PORC (0.42 vs. 0.31 mg·kg-1·h-1, p = 0.01), while the time interval between the last administration of rocuronium and neostigmine was lower (72.5 vs. 99.0 min, p ≤ 0.01). Conclusion The proposed systematization reduced PORC incidence in PACU in the absence of intraoperative AMG.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000600592&lng=en&tlng=enNeuromuscular blockersRocuroniumNeostigminePostoperative residual curarizationQuantitative neuromuscular monitoringAcceleromyography
spellingShingle Filipe Nadir Caparica Santos
Angelica de Fátima de Assunção Braga
Carla Josefine Barbosa de Lima Ribeiro
Franklin Sarmento da Silva Braga
Vanessa Henriques Carvalho
Fernando Eduardo Feres Junqueira
Use of protocol and evaluation of postoperative residual curarization incidence in the absence of intraoperative acceleromyography - Randomized clinical trial
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia
Neuromuscular blockers
Rocuronium
Neostigmine
Postoperative residual curarization
Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring
Acceleromyography
title Use of protocol and evaluation of postoperative residual curarization incidence in the absence of intraoperative acceleromyography - Randomized clinical trial
title_full Use of protocol and evaluation of postoperative residual curarization incidence in the absence of intraoperative acceleromyography - Randomized clinical trial
title_fullStr Use of protocol and evaluation of postoperative residual curarization incidence in the absence of intraoperative acceleromyography - Randomized clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Use of protocol and evaluation of postoperative residual curarization incidence in the absence of intraoperative acceleromyography - Randomized clinical trial
title_short Use of protocol and evaluation of postoperative residual curarization incidence in the absence of intraoperative acceleromyography - Randomized clinical trial
title_sort use of protocol and evaluation of postoperative residual curarization incidence in the absence of intraoperative acceleromyography randomized clinical trial
topic Neuromuscular blockers
Rocuronium
Neostigmine
Postoperative residual curarization
Quantitative neuromuscular monitoring
Acceleromyography
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942017000600592&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT filipenadircaparicasantos useofprotocolandevaluationofpostoperativeresidualcurarizationincidenceintheabsenceofintraoperativeacceleromyographyrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT angelicadefatimadeassuncaobraga useofprotocolandevaluationofpostoperativeresidualcurarizationincidenceintheabsenceofintraoperativeacceleromyographyrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT carlajosefinebarbosadelimaribeiro useofprotocolandevaluationofpostoperativeresidualcurarizationincidenceintheabsenceofintraoperativeacceleromyographyrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT franklinsarmentodasilvabraga useofprotocolandevaluationofpostoperativeresidualcurarizationincidenceintheabsenceofintraoperativeacceleromyographyrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT vanessahenriquescarvalho useofprotocolandevaluationofpostoperativeresidualcurarizationincidenceintheabsenceofintraoperativeacceleromyographyrandomizedclinicaltrial
AT fernandoeduardoferesjunqueira useofprotocolandevaluationofpostoperativeresidualcurarizationincidenceintheabsenceofintraoperativeacceleromyographyrandomizedclinicaltrial