β-Mannanase Supplementation as an Eco-Friendly Feed Strategy to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Feeding Programs

Little is still known about the environmental impacts of exogenous enzyme supplementation in pig and poultry feeding programs. Thus, this study aimed to assess the potential environmental impacts of producing feeds for pigs and broilers by simulating the effects of β-mannanase Hemicell™ HT supplemen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Felipe M. W. Hickmann, Ines Andretta, Marie-Pierre Létourneau-Montminy, Aline Remus, Gabriela M. Galli, Juliano Vittori, Marcos Kipper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.732253/full
_version_ 1830285207135059968
author Felipe M. W. Hickmann
Ines Andretta
Marie-Pierre Létourneau-Montminy
Aline Remus
Gabriela M. Galli
Juliano Vittori
Marcos Kipper
author_facet Felipe M. W. Hickmann
Ines Andretta
Marie-Pierre Létourneau-Montminy
Aline Remus
Gabriela M. Galli
Juliano Vittori
Marcos Kipper
author_sort Felipe M. W. Hickmann
collection DOAJ
description Little is still known about the environmental impacts of exogenous enzyme supplementation in pig and poultry feeding programs. Thus, this study aimed to assess the potential environmental impacts of producing feeds for pigs and broilers by simulating the effects of β-mannanase Hemicell™ HT supplementation through energy savings during diet formulation. Life-cycle assessment standards were applied to simulate a cradle-to-feed mill gate scope. The functional units used were the production of 1 kg of the enzyme and 1 kg of feed at a feed mill gate located in Concórdia, Santa Catarina, Brazil. Climate change, eutrophication, and acidification were the chosen environmental impact categories. Energy savings through β-mannanase supplementation were assessed by different metabolizable energy (ME) matrices (45 or 90 kcal of ME/kg of feed) during diet formulation in different grain production scenarios (Southern and/or Central-West origin). A total of 28 feeds were formulated based on the nutritional requirements and feeding programs described in the Brazilian Tables for Poultry and Swine. The least-cost formulation method was used based on real price averages practiced in a local industry over 12 months. The production of 1 kg of β-mannanase was associated with the emission of 1,800 g of CO2-eq, 4.53 g of PO4-eq, and 7.89 g of SO2-eq. For pig feeds, β-mannanase supplementation mitigated both climate change and eutrophication impacts up to 8.5 and 1.4% (45 kcal of ME/kg of feed) or up to 16.2 and 2.7% (90 kcal of ME/kg of feed) compared to control diets formulated without the enzyme. For broiler feeds, these impacts were mitigated up to 5.6 and 1.1% (45 kcal of ME/kg of feed), respectively. On the other hand, the effect of using β-mannanase on the acidification impact was not consistent among feeds/species. Overall, β-mannanase supplementation reduced the amount of soybean oil in feed formulas, which is associated with high environmental impacts. Consequently, the potential impacts of climate change and eutrophication associated with producing feeds for pigs and broilers were substantially mitigated. These results suggest that β-mannanase supplementation is an eco-friendly feed strategy to reduce the environmental impacts of pig and poultry feeding programs.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T03:35:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3585fa1ae61c405f825ed0923c4706bf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-1769
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T03:35:02Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Veterinary Science
spelling doaj.art-3585fa1ae61c405f825ed0923c4706bf2022-12-21T20:37:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692021-10-01810.3389/fvets.2021.732253732253β-Mannanase Supplementation as an Eco-Friendly Feed Strategy to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Feeding ProgramsFelipe M. W. Hickmann0Ines Andretta1Marie-Pierre Létourneau-Montminy2Aline Remus3Gabriela M. Galli4Juliano Vittori5Marcos Kipper6Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, BrazilDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, BrazilDépartement des Sciences Animales, Faculté des Sciences de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, CanadaSherbrooke Research and Development Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, CanadaDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, BrazilElanco Animal Health, São Paulo, BrazilElanco Animal Health, São Paulo, BrazilLittle is still known about the environmental impacts of exogenous enzyme supplementation in pig and poultry feeding programs. Thus, this study aimed to assess the potential environmental impacts of producing feeds for pigs and broilers by simulating the effects of β-mannanase Hemicell™ HT supplementation through energy savings during diet formulation. Life-cycle assessment standards were applied to simulate a cradle-to-feed mill gate scope. The functional units used were the production of 1 kg of the enzyme and 1 kg of feed at a feed mill gate located in Concórdia, Santa Catarina, Brazil. Climate change, eutrophication, and acidification were the chosen environmental impact categories. Energy savings through β-mannanase supplementation were assessed by different metabolizable energy (ME) matrices (45 or 90 kcal of ME/kg of feed) during diet formulation in different grain production scenarios (Southern and/or Central-West origin). A total of 28 feeds were formulated based on the nutritional requirements and feeding programs described in the Brazilian Tables for Poultry and Swine. The least-cost formulation method was used based on real price averages practiced in a local industry over 12 months. The production of 1 kg of β-mannanase was associated with the emission of 1,800 g of CO2-eq, 4.53 g of PO4-eq, and 7.89 g of SO2-eq. For pig feeds, β-mannanase supplementation mitigated both climate change and eutrophication impacts up to 8.5 and 1.4% (45 kcal of ME/kg of feed) or up to 16.2 and 2.7% (90 kcal of ME/kg of feed) compared to control diets formulated without the enzyme. For broiler feeds, these impacts were mitigated up to 5.6 and 1.1% (45 kcal of ME/kg of feed), respectively. On the other hand, the effect of using β-mannanase on the acidification impact was not consistent among feeds/species. Overall, β-mannanase supplementation reduced the amount of soybean oil in feed formulas, which is associated with high environmental impacts. Consequently, the potential impacts of climate change and eutrophication associated with producing feeds for pigs and broilers were substantially mitigated. These results suggest that β-mannanase supplementation is an eco-friendly feed strategy to reduce the environmental impacts of pig and poultry feeding programs.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.732253/fullswinebroilerenvironmentfeedenzymeclimate change
spellingShingle Felipe M. W. Hickmann
Ines Andretta
Marie-Pierre Létourneau-Montminy
Aline Remus
Gabriela M. Galli
Juliano Vittori
Marcos Kipper
β-Mannanase Supplementation as an Eco-Friendly Feed Strategy to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Feeding Programs
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
swine
broiler
environment
feed
enzyme
climate change
title β-Mannanase Supplementation as an Eco-Friendly Feed Strategy to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Feeding Programs
title_full β-Mannanase Supplementation as an Eco-Friendly Feed Strategy to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Feeding Programs
title_fullStr β-Mannanase Supplementation as an Eco-Friendly Feed Strategy to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Feeding Programs
title_full_unstemmed β-Mannanase Supplementation as an Eco-Friendly Feed Strategy to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Feeding Programs
title_short β-Mannanase Supplementation as an Eco-Friendly Feed Strategy to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig and Poultry Feeding Programs
title_sort β mannanase supplementation as an eco friendly feed strategy to reduce the environmental impacts of pig and poultry feeding programs
topic swine
broiler
environment
feed
enzyme
climate change
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2021.732253/full
work_keys_str_mv AT felipemwhickmann bmannanasesupplementationasanecofriendlyfeedstrategytoreducetheenvironmentalimpactsofpigandpoultryfeedingprograms
AT inesandretta bmannanasesupplementationasanecofriendlyfeedstrategytoreducetheenvironmentalimpactsofpigandpoultryfeedingprograms
AT mariepierreletourneaumontminy bmannanasesupplementationasanecofriendlyfeedstrategytoreducetheenvironmentalimpactsofpigandpoultryfeedingprograms
AT alineremus bmannanasesupplementationasanecofriendlyfeedstrategytoreducetheenvironmentalimpactsofpigandpoultryfeedingprograms
AT gabrielamgalli bmannanasesupplementationasanecofriendlyfeedstrategytoreducetheenvironmentalimpactsofpigandpoultryfeedingprograms
AT julianovittori bmannanasesupplementationasanecofriendlyfeedstrategytoreducetheenvironmentalimpactsofpigandpoultryfeedingprograms
AT marcoskipper bmannanasesupplementationasanecofriendlyfeedstrategytoreducetheenvironmentalimpactsofpigandpoultryfeedingprograms