Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production

Archaeolinguistics, a field which combines language reconstruction and archaeology as a source of information on human prehistory, has much to offer to deepen our understanding of the Neolithic and Bronze Age in Northeast Asia. So far, integrated comparative analyses of words and tools for textile p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Nelson, Irina Zhushchikhovskaya, Tao Li, Mark Hudson, Martine Robbeets
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2020-01-01
Series:Evolutionary Human Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2513843X20000043/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811156362059579392
author Sarah Nelson
Irina Zhushchikhovskaya
Tao Li
Mark Hudson
Martine Robbeets
author_facet Sarah Nelson
Irina Zhushchikhovskaya
Tao Li
Mark Hudson
Martine Robbeets
author_sort Sarah Nelson
collection DOAJ
description Archaeolinguistics, a field which combines language reconstruction and archaeology as a source of information on human prehistory, has much to offer to deepen our understanding of the Neolithic and Bronze Age in Northeast Asia. So far, integrated comparative analyses of words and tools for textile production are completely lacking for the Northeast Asian Neolithic and Bronze Age. To remedy this situation, here we integrate linguistic and archaeological evidence of textile production, with the aim of shedding light on ancient population movements in Northeast China, the Russian Far East, Korea and Japan. We show that the transition to more sophisticated textile technology in these regions can be associated not only with the adoption of millet agriculture but also with the spread of the languages of the so-called ‘Transeurasian’ family. In this way, our research provides indirect support for the Language/Farming Dispersal Hypothesis, which posits that language expansion from the Neolithic onwards was often associated with agricultural colonization.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:50:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-359f28cae30d40bb858d634d39845eb1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2513-843X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:50:15Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Evolutionary Human Sciences
spelling doaj.art-359f28cae30d40bb858d634d39845eb12023-03-09T12:32:20ZengCambridge University PressEvolutionary Human Sciences2513-843X2020-01-01210.1017/ehs.2020.4Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile productionSarah Nelson0Irina Zhushchikhovskaya1Tao Li2Mark Hudson3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9483-9303Martine Robbeets4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2860-0230Department of Anthropology, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USALaboratory of Medieval Archaeology, Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnography of Peoples of Far East, Far Eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, RussiaEurasia3angle Research group, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, Germany Department of Archaeology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, ChinaEurasia3angle Research group, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, GermanyEurasia3angle Research group, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena, GermanyArchaeolinguistics, a field which combines language reconstruction and archaeology as a source of information on human prehistory, has much to offer to deepen our understanding of the Neolithic and Bronze Age in Northeast Asia. So far, integrated comparative analyses of words and tools for textile production are completely lacking for the Northeast Asian Neolithic and Bronze Age. To remedy this situation, here we integrate linguistic and archaeological evidence of textile production, with the aim of shedding light on ancient population movements in Northeast China, the Russian Far East, Korea and Japan. We show that the transition to more sophisticated textile technology in these regions can be associated not only with the adoption of millet agriculture but also with the spread of the languages of the so-called ‘Transeurasian’ family. In this way, our research provides indirect support for the Language/Farming Dispersal Hypothesis, which posits that language expansion from the Neolithic onwards was often associated with agricultural colonization.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2513843X20000043/type/journal_articleArchaeolinguisticsLanguage/Farming Dispersal HypothesisTranseurasian language familytextile technologyNortheast Asia
spellingShingle Sarah Nelson
Irina Zhushchikhovskaya
Tao Li
Mark Hudson
Martine Robbeets
Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production
Evolutionary Human Sciences
Archaeolinguistics
Language/Farming Dispersal Hypothesis
Transeurasian language family
textile technology
Northeast Asia
title Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production
title_full Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production
title_fullStr Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production
title_full_unstemmed Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production
title_short Tracing population movements in ancient East Asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production
title_sort tracing population movements in ancient east asia through the linguistics and archaeology of textile production
topic Archaeolinguistics
Language/Farming Dispersal Hypothesis
Transeurasian language family
textile technology
Northeast Asia
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2513843X20000043/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahnelson tracingpopulationmovementsinancienteastasiathroughthelinguisticsandarchaeologyoftextileproduction
AT irinazhushchikhovskaya tracingpopulationmovementsinancienteastasiathroughthelinguisticsandarchaeologyoftextileproduction
AT taoli tracingpopulationmovementsinancienteastasiathroughthelinguisticsandarchaeologyoftextileproduction
AT markhudson tracingpopulationmovementsinancienteastasiathroughthelinguisticsandarchaeologyoftextileproduction
AT martinerobbeets tracingpopulationmovementsinancienteastasiathroughthelinguisticsandarchaeologyoftextileproduction