Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐005)
Abstract Following the submission of application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐005 under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Syngenta Crop Protection NV/SA, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (GMO Panel) was asked to deliver a scientific risk assessment on the data submitt...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2017-10-01
|
Series: | EFSA Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5006 |
_version_ | 1819290140962455552 |
---|---|
author | EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) Hanspeter Naegeli Andrew Nicholas Birch Josep Casacuberta Adinda De Schrijver Mikołaj Antoni Gralak Philippe Guerche Huw Jones Barbara Manachini Antoine Messéan Elsa Ebbesen Nielsen Fabien Nogué Christophe Robaglia Nils Rostoks Jeremy Sweet Christoph Tebbe Francesco Visioli Jean‐Michel Wal Fernando Álvarez Michele Ardizzone Nikoletta Papadopoulou |
author_facet | EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) Hanspeter Naegeli Andrew Nicholas Birch Josep Casacuberta Adinda De Schrijver Mikołaj Antoni Gralak Philippe Guerche Huw Jones Barbara Manachini Antoine Messéan Elsa Ebbesen Nielsen Fabien Nogué Christophe Robaglia Nils Rostoks Jeremy Sweet Christoph Tebbe Francesco Visioli Jean‐Michel Wal Fernando Álvarez Michele Ardizzone Nikoletta Papadopoulou |
author_sort | EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Following the submission of application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐005 under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Syngenta Crop Protection NV/SA, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (GMO Panel) was asked to deliver a scientific risk assessment on the data submitted in the context of the renewal of authorisation application of the herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified maize GA21. The data received in the context of this renewal application contained post‐market environmental monitoring reports, a systematic search and evaluation of literature, updated bioinformatics analyses, and additional documents or studies performed by or on behalf of the applicant. The GMO Panel assessed these data for possible new hazards, modified exposure or new scientific uncertainties identified during the authorisation period and not previously assessed in the context of the original application. Under the assumption that the DNA sequence of the event in maize GA21 considered for renewal is identical to the corrected sequence of the originally assessed event, the GMO Panel concludes that there is no evidence in the renewal application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐005 for new hazards, modified exposure or scientific uncertainties that would change the conclusions of the original risk assessment on maize GA21. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-24T03:18:01Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-359fb456ae6047a3808de875289d57e1 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1831-4732 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-24T03:18:01Z |
publishDate | 2017-10-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | EFSA Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-359fb456ae6047a3808de875289d57e12022-12-21T17:17:35ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322017-10-011510n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5006Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐005)EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)Hanspeter NaegeliAndrew Nicholas BirchJosep CasacubertaAdinda De SchrijverMikołaj Antoni GralakPhilippe GuercheHuw JonesBarbara ManachiniAntoine MesséanElsa Ebbesen NielsenFabien NoguéChristophe RobagliaNils RostoksJeremy SweetChristoph TebbeFrancesco VisioliJean‐Michel WalFernando ÁlvarezMichele ArdizzoneNikoletta PapadopoulouAbstract Following the submission of application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐005 under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Syngenta Crop Protection NV/SA, the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (GMO Panel) was asked to deliver a scientific risk assessment on the data submitted in the context of the renewal of authorisation application of the herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified maize GA21. The data received in the context of this renewal application contained post‐market environmental monitoring reports, a systematic search and evaluation of literature, updated bioinformatics analyses, and additional documents or studies performed by or on behalf of the applicant. The GMO Panel assessed these data for possible new hazards, modified exposure or new scientific uncertainties identified during the authorisation period and not previously assessed in the context of the original application. Under the assumption that the DNA sequence of the event in maize GA21 considered for renewal is identical to the corrected sequence of the originally assessed event, the GMO Panel concludes that there is no evidence in the renewal application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐005 for new hazards, modified exposure or scientific uncertainties that would change the conclusions of the original risk assessment on maize GA21.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5006maizeGA21renewalarticles 11 and 23Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 |
spellingShingle | EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) Hanspeter Naegeli Andrew Nicholas Birch Josep Casacuberta Adinda De Schrijver Mikołaj Antoni Gralak Philippe Guerche Huw Jones Barbara Manachini Antoine Messéan Elsa Ebbesen Nielsen Fabien Nogué Christophe Robaglia Nils Rostoks Jeremy Sweet Christoph Tebbe Francesco Visioli Jean‐Michel Wal Fernando Álvarez Michele Ardizzone Nikoletta Papadopoulou Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐005) EFSA Journal maize GA21 renewal articles 11 and 23 Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 |
title | Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐005) |
title_full | Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐005) |
title_fullStr | Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐005) |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐005) |
title_short | Assessment of genetically modified maize GA21 for renewal of authorisation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐RX‐005) |
title_sort | assessment of genetically modified maize ga21 for renewal of authorisation under regulation ec no 1829 2003 application efsa gmo rx 005 |
topic | maize GA21 renewal articles 11 and 23 Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 |
url | https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT efsapanelongeneticallymodifiedorganismsgmo assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT hanspeternaegeli assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT andrewnicholasbirch assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT josepcasacuberta assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT adindadeschrijver assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT mikołajantonigralak assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT philippeguerche assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT huwjones assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT barbaramanachini assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT antoinemessean assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT elsaebbesennielsen assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT fabiennogue assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT christopherobaglia assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT nilsrostoks assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT jeremysweet assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT christophtebbe assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT francescovisioli assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT jeanmichelwal assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT fernandoalvarez assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT micheleardizzone assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 AT nikolettapapadopoulou assessmentofgeneticallymodifiedmaizega21forrenewalofauthorisationunderregulationecno18292003applicationefsagmorx005 |