Sound Descriptions of Haptic Experiences of Art Work by Deafblind Cochlear Implant Users

Deafblind persons’ perception and experiences are based on their residual auditive and visual senses, and touch. Their haptic exploration, through movements and orientation towards objects give blind persons direct, independent experience. Few studies explore the aesthetic experiences and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Riitta Lahtinen, Camilla Groth, Russ Palmer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-05-01
Series:Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/2/2/24
_version_ 1811302054107283456
author Riitta Lahtinen
Camilla Groth
Russ Palmer
author_facet Riitta Lahtinen
Camilla Groth
Russ Palmer
author_sort Riitta Lahtinen
collection DOAJ
description Deafblind persons’ perception and experiences are based on their residual auditive and visual senses, and touch. Their haptic exploration, through movements and orientation towards objects give blind persons direct, independent experience. Few studies explore the aesthetic experiences and appreciation of artefacts of deafblind people using cochlear implant (CI) technology, and how they interpret and express their perceived aesthetic experience through another sensory modality. While speech recognition is studied extensively in this area, the aspect of auditive descriptions made by CI users are a less-studied domain. This present research intervention describes and analyses five different deafblind people sharing their interpretation of five statues vocally, using sounds and written descriptions based on their haptic explorations. The participants found new and multimodal ways of expressing their experiences, as well as re-experiencing them through technological aids. We also found that the CI users modify technology to better suit their personal needs. We conclude that CI technology in combination with self-made sound descriptions enhance memorization of haptic art experiences that can be re-called by the recording of the sound descriptions. This research expands the idea of auditive descriptions, and encourages user-produced descriptions as artistic supports to traditional linguistic, audio descriptions. These can be used to create personal auditive–haptic memory collections similar to how sighted create photo albums.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T07:21:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-35b1456f98c2466685f79c8bec3b441f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2414-4088
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T07:21:04Z
publishDate 2018-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
spelling doaj.art-35b1456f98c2466685f79c8bec3b441f2022-12-22T02:56:37ZengMDPI AGMultimodal Technologies and Interaction2414-40882018-05-01222410.3390/mti2020024mti2020024Sound Descriptions of Haptic Experiences of Art Work by Deafblind Cochlear Implant UsersRiitta Lahtinen0Camilla Groth1Russ Palmer2ISE Research Group, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, FinlandFashion/Textile Futures Research Group, Department of Design, Aalto University School of Arts, Design and Architecture, 00560 Helsinki, FinlandISE Research Group, Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, FinlandDeafblind persons’ perception and experiences are based on their residual auditive and visual senses, and touch. Their haptic exploration, through movements and orientation towards objects give blind persons direct, independent experience. Few studies explore the aesthetic experiences and appreciation of artefacts of deafblind people using cochlear implant (CI) technology, and how they interpret and express their perceived aesthetic experience through another sensory modality. While speech recognition is studied extensively in this area, the aspect of auditive descriptions made by CI users are a less-studied domain. This present research intervention describes and analyses five different deafblind people sharing their interpretation of five statues vocally, using sounds and written descriptions based on their haptic explorations. The participants found new and multimodal ways of expressing their experiences, as well as re-experiencing them through technological aids. We also found that the CI users modify technology to better suit their personal needs. We conclude that CI technology in combination with self-made sound descriptions enhance memorization of haptic art experiences that can be re-called by the recording of the sound descriptions. This research expands the idea of auditive descriptions, and encourages user-produced descriptions as artistic supports to traditional linguistic, audio descriptions. These can be used to create personal auditive–haptic memory collections similar to how sighted create photo albums.http://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/2/2/24haptic experiencedeafblindnesstechnological aidscochlear implantaesthetic experiencevocalization as memory
spellingShingle Riitta Lahtinen
Camilla Groth
Russ Palmer
Sound Descriptions of Haptic Experiences of Art Work by Deafblind Cochlear Implant Users
Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
haptic experience
deafblindness
technological aids
cochlear implant
aesthetic experience
vocalization as memory
title Sound Descriptions of Haptic Experiences of Art Work by Deafblind Cochlear Implant Users
title_full Sound Descriptions of Haptic Experiences of Art Work by Deafblind Cochlear Implant Users
title_fullStr Sound Descriptions of Haptic Experiences of Art Work by Deafblind Cochlear Implant Users
title_full_unstemmed Sound Descriptions of Haptic Experiences of Art Work by Deafblind Cochlear Implant Users
title_short Sound Descriptions of Haptic Experiences of Art Work by Deafblind Cochlear Implant Users
title_sort sound descriptions of haptic experiences of art work by deafblind cochlear implant users
topic haptic experience
deafblindness
technological aids
cochlear implant
aesthetic experience
vocalization as memory
url http://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/2/2/24
work_keys_str_mv AT riittalahtinen sounddescriptionsofhapticexperiencesofartworkbydeafblindcochlearimplantusers
AT camillagroth sounddescriptionsofhapticexperiencesofartworkbydeafblindcochlearimplantusers
AT russpalmer sounddescriptionsofhapticexperiencesofartworkbydeafblindcochlearimplantusers