What is ‘English for Tourism’?: An Updated ‘Grounded Review’ of the Literature

This paper reports the results of a replication of an exploratory study conducted five years earlier that sought to answer the deceptively simple question: ‘What is English for Tourism?’. The original study created a corpus of 348 texts that served as a representative sample of all EfT literature av...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael Joseph Ennis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures at the University of Verona 2021-12-01
Series:Iperstoria
Subjects:
Online Access:https://iperstoria.it/article/view/1046
_version_ 1819103149500137472
author Michael Joseph Ennis
author_facet Michael Joseph Ennis
author_sort Michael Joseph Ennis
collection DOAJ
description This paper reports the results of a replication of an exploratory study conducted five years earlier that sought to answer the deceptively simple question: ‘What is English for Tourism?’. The original study created a corpus of 348 texts that served as a representative sample of all EfT literature available on Google Books and Google Scholar at the time, including both teaching material and academic literature. A qualitative analysis, which categorized and coded the corpus in accordance with grounded theory, revealed two categories of teaching material—those written for local markets and those written for international markets—as well as two parallel research traditions within this niche of applied linguistics: studies that aim to understand and inform the teaching and learning of English for tourism (EfT) and studies that seek to understand and explain the English of tourism (EoT). A quantitative analysis using Microsoft Excel and the free concordancer LancsBox confirmed and qualified these thematic categories via a comparative analysis of the EfT and EoT sub-corpora. The present study employed the same sampling frame to update the existing corpus with 543 texts published or made accessible online over the last five years. The same mixed-methods data analyses were performed on the expanded corpus. The results of the replication reconfirm the semantic, conceptual, theoretical, and methodological differences and interdependencies between EfT and EoT found during the first study. The results also reveal recent shifts in international and national discourses and expose further gaps in the existing body of literature.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T01:45:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-35b607bdfaa64ca8bc02435f0d70ae7e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2281-4582
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T01:45:52Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures at the University of Verona
record_format Article
series Iperstoria
spelling doaj.art-35b607bdfaa64ca8bc02435f0d70ae7e2022-12-21T18:43:05ZengDepartment of Foreign Languages and Literatures at the University of VeronaIperstoria2281-45822021-12-0101810.13136/2281-4582/2021.i18.1046912What is ‘English for Tourism’?: An Updated ‘Grounded Review’ of the LiteratureMichael Joseph Ennis0Free University of Bozen-BolzanoThis paper reports the results of a replication of an exploratory study conducted five years earlier that sought to answer the deceptively simple question: ‘What is English for Tourism?’. The original study created a corpus of 348 texts that served as a representative sample of all EfT literature available on Google Books and Google Scholar at the time, including both teaching material and academic literature. A qualitative analysis, which categorized and coded the corpus in accordance with grounded theory, revealed two categories of teaching material—those written for local markets and those written for international markets—as well as two parallel research traditions within this niche of applied linguistics: studies that aim to understand and inform the teaching and learning of English for tourism (EfT) and studies that seek to understand and explain the English of tourism (EoT). A quantitative analysis using Microsoft Excel and the free concordancer LancsBox confirmed and qualified these thematic categories via a comparative analysis of the EfT and EoT sub-corpora. The present study employed the same sampling frame to update the existing corpus with 543 texts published or made accessible online over the last five years. The same mixed-methods data analyses were performed on the expanded corpus. The results of the replication reconfirm the semantic, conceptual, theoretical, and methodological differences and interdependencies between EfT and EoT found during the first study. The results also reveal recent shifts in international and national discourses and expose further gaps in the existing body of literature.https://iperstoria.it/article/view/1046english for tourismenglish of tourismenglish for specific purposesgrounded theorycorpus-based researchliterature review
spellingShingle Michael Joseph Ennis
What is ‘English for Tourism’?: An Updated ‘Grounded Review’ of the Literature
Iperstoria
english for tourism
english of tourism
english for specific purposes
grounded theory
corpus-based research
literature review
title What is ‘English for Tourism’?: An Updated ‘Grounded Review’ of the Literature
title_full What is ‘English for Tourism’?: An Updated ‘Grounded Review’ of the Literature
title_fullStr What is ‘English for Tourism’?: An Updated ‘Grounded Review’ of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed What is ‘English for Tourism’?: An Updated ‘Grounded Review’ of the Literature
title_short What is ‘English for Tourism’?: An Updated ‘Grounded Review’ of the Literature
title_sort what is english for tourism an updated grounded review of the literature
topic english for tourism
english of tourism
english for specific purposes
grounded theory
corpus-based research
literature review
url https://iperstoria.it/article/view/1046
work_keys_str_mv AT michaeljosephennis whatisenglishfortourismanupdatedgroundedreviewoftheliterature