Mapping Public-Planner Conflicts in SUDS Implementation Using Cultural Dimensions—A Case Study

The timely implementation of climate adaptation measures for the urban environment is essential to the creation of robust cities. Within Norway, these adaptation measures are undertaken at the municipal level. Unfortunately, the implementation of adaptation measures has lagged behind expectations, p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bridget Thodesen, Erlend Andenæs, Rolf André Bohne, Tore Kvande
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:Urban Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/7/2/61
_version_ 1827735431053049856
author Bridget Thodesen
Erlend Andenæs
Rolf André Bohne
Tore Kvande
author_facet Bridget Thodesen
Erlend Andenæs
Rolf André Bohne
Tore Kvande
author_sort Bridget Thodesen
collection DOAJ
description The timely implementation of climate adaptation measures for the urban environment is essential to the creation of robust cities. Within Norway, these adaptation measures are undertaken at the municipal level. Unfortunately, the implementation of adaptation measures has lagged behind expectations, partially due to public resistance to local projects. City planners seek tools to provide insight into the priorities of residents to build consensus and public support. This study follows up on two previous case studies of Sustainable Urban Drainage System (SUDS) implementation in Trondheim, Norway, where the prioritization of urban space is often a source of conflict. The Hofstede Cultural Compass is a tool that maps six cultural dimensions used in research and practice to inform users about cultural norms and cross-cultural divergences. This study seeks to test and verify this tool for use in building public consensus and support. Municipal managers responsible for project implementation took the Cultural Compass survey, and the results were collectively mapped and compared to the public at large. The Cultural Compass found notable divergences between the municipality and the Norwegian public within the areas of “Long-term Orientation”, “Uncertainty Avoidance”, and “Masculinity vs. Femininity”. These findings were cross-referenced with thematically analyzed interviews of residents regarding their perceptions of a municipal SUDS project. Together, these case studies give greater insight into the issues of diverging priorities and perspectives experienced in the implementation of SUDS. Recommendations are presented to aid the understanding of intercultural divergences between planning offices and public priorities in an effort to better engage the public and build consensus.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T01:50:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-35ba876f7c5e42859df87c1762a9b9bc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2413-8851
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T01:50:50Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Urban Science
spelling doaj.art-35ba876f7c5e42859df87c1762a9b9bc2023-11-18T12:57:50ZengMDPI AGUrban Science2413-88512023-06-01726110.3390/urbansci7020061Mapping Public-Planner Conflicts in SUDS Implementation Using Cultural Dimensions—A Case StudyBridget Thodesen0Erlend Andenæs1Rolf André Bohne2Tore Kvande3Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7034 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7034 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7034 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7034 Trondheim, NorwayThe timely implementation of climate adaptation measures for the urban environment is essential to the creation of robust cities. Within Norway, these adaptation measures are undertaken at the municipal level. Unfortunately, the implementation of adaptation measures has lagged behind expectations, partially due to public resistance to local projects. City planners seek tools to provide insight into the priorities of residents to build consensus and public support. This study follows up on two previous case studies of Sustainable Urban Drainage System (SUDS) implementation in Trondheim, Norway, where the prioritization of urban space is often a source of conflict. The Hofstede Cultural Compass is a tool that maps six cultural dimensions used in research and practice to inform users about cultural norms and cross-cultural divergences. This study seeks to test and verify this tool for use in building public consensus and support. Municipal managers responsible for project implementation took the Cultural Compass survey, and the results were collectively mapped and compared to the public at large. The Cultural Compass found notable divergences between the municipality and the Norwegian public within the areas of “Long-term Orientation”, “Uncertainty Avoidance”, and “Masculinity vs. Femininity”. These findings were cross-referenced with thematically analyzed interviews of residents regarding their perceptions of a municipal SUDS project. Together, these case studies give greater insight into the issues of diverging priorities and perspectives experienced in the implementation of SUDS. Recommendations are presented to aid the understanding of intercultural divergences between planning offices and public priorities in an effort to better engage the public and build consensus.https://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/7/2/61stormwater managementnature-based solutionsSUDSclimate changepublic perceptionclimate adaptation
spellingShingle Bridget Thodesen
Erlend Andenæs
Rolf André Bohne
Tore Kvande
Mapping Public-Planner Conflicts in SUDS Implementation Using Cultural Dimensions—A Case Study
Urban Science
stormwater management
nature-based solutions
SUDS
climate change
public perception
climate adaptation
title Mapping Public-Planner Conflicts in SUDS Implementation Using Cultural Dimensions—A Case Study
title_full Mapping Public-Planner Conflicts in SUDS Implementation Using Cultural Dimensions—A Case Study
title_fullStr Mapping Public-Planner Conflicts in SUDS Implementation Using Cultural Dimensions—A Case Study
title_full_unstemmed Mapping Public-Planner Conflicts in SUDS Implementation Using Cultural Dimensions—A Case Study
title_short Mapping Public-Planner Conflicts in SUDS Implementation Using Cultural Dimensions—A Case Study
title_sort mapping public planner conflicts in suds implementation using cultural dimensions a case study
topic stormwater management
nature-based solutions
SUDS
climate change
public perception
climate adaptation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/7/2/61
work_keys_str_mv AT bridgetthodesen mappingpublicplannerconflictsinsudsimplementationusingculturaldimensionsacasestudy
AT erlendandenæs mappingpublicplannerconflictsinsudsimplementationusingculturaldimensionsacasestudy
AT rolfandrebohne mappingpublicplannerconflictsinsudsimplementationusingculturaldimensionsacasestudy
AT torekvande mappingpublicplannerconflictsinsudsimplementationusingculturaldimensionsacasestudy