Evaluating the Sustainability of Canola Agroecosystems Using Energy Analysis, Carbon Footprint, and Greenhouse Gases

IntroductionIn recent decades, the need for increased food production has resulted in the expansion of intensified agriculture practices characterized by high consumption of inputs, thereby reducing agricultural sustainability. The agricultural sector's contribution to the world's energy c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H. R Shahhoseini, S Lotfi, H Kazemi, B Kamkar
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Ferdowsi University of Mashhad 2023-06-01
Series:پژوهشهای زراعی ایران
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcesc.um.ac.ir/article_43251_0e2a8cd5dd7884a03bb9a4d6c8c38ea5.pdf
_version_ 1797802298057949184
author H. R Shahhoseini
S Lotfi
H Kazemi
B Kamkar
author_facet H. R Shahhoseini
S Lotfi
H Kazemi
B Kamkar
author_sort H. R Shahhoseini
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionIn recent decades, the need for increased food production has resulted in the expansion of intensified agriculture practices characterized by high consumption of inputs, thereby reducing agricultural sustainability. The agricultural sector's contribution to the world's energy consumption, ecological footprint, and greenhouse gas emissions has grown substantially. Emissions of greenhouse gases have negative ecological effects, including climate change, global warming, and diminished sustainable development. In this sector, energy analysis and greenhouse gas emissions in ecosystems are the most common methods for assessing sustainability. This study was conducted to evaluate the sustainability of canola agroecosystems by analyzing energy consumption, carbon footprint, and greenhouse gas emissions.Methods and MaterialsThe study was conducted using a questionnaire in Kalaleh County, in Golestan province, and gathering information from Golestan Agricultural Jihad Organization, during 2018-2019. The number of samples was determined by the Cochran formula. Accordingly, 50 farms were selected for canola cultivation. The questionnaire's reliability was determined to be 0.81. To calculate the energy indices, carbon footprint, and greenhouse gas emissions, after determining the most important inputs and output, first, their amounts were determined in each of the 50 farms and then their average was calculated. The energy equivalent of each input and output was calculated by multiplying its raw value by the corresponding energy conversion factor. The carbon footprint of the canola system was calculated as the amount of land required to absorb the environmental pollution caused by input and resource consumption. Carbon uptake in canola agroecosystems served as the basis for evaluating the carbon footprint and consequently the sustainability of this study. Also, the amount of greenhouse gases produced was determined by multiplying the raw values of the consumed inputs by their emission coefficient. Results and DiscussionIn canola agroecosystems, the total energy input was calculated to be 13,200 MJ ha-1, the total energy output was 63,400 MJ ha-1, the energy use efficiency was 4.8, and the energy productivity was 0.17 kg MJ-1. In addition, the ecological footprint and global warming potential were 0.99 gha and 779.03 CO2e ha−1, respectively. In canola production, fossil fuel and nitrogen fertilizer inputs contributed the most to ecological footprint and global warming potential respectively. Reducing the number of machines entering the farm through the application of conservation tillage methods and the modernization of machines can be effective in reducing the consumption of this input. Due to the non-renewability of this input, reducing its consumption is effective in reducing both economic costs and environmental pollution. Consuming as much livestock manure (cattle) as possible and implementing crop rotations with legumes such as soybeans that can grow well in this area is effective in supplying soil nitrogen and reducing the need for chemical fertilizers. ConclusionAnalysis of energy indices, such as energy efficiency and net energy, revealed that energy loss in the canola farming ecosystem is low and that the system's sustainability is adequate. Evaluation of carbon footprint revealed that the value of this index for canola production in the county of Kalaleh was less than the ecological capacity of each hectare of land used for canola production, indicating the environmental sustainability of canola production in the county of Kalaleh. In general, canola agroecosystems in the county of Kalaleh were sustainable based on terms of all three indices: net energy, carbon footprint, and global warming potential. Due to the large proportion of two inputs, fossil fuel, and nitrogen fertilizer, in these indices and their significant impact on production sustainability, consumption management of these inputs and training and justification of farmers are recommended to increase production sustainability.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T05:03:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-35c9030937c34479974f482d20775fcc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2008-1472
2423-3978
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-13T05:03:35Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
record_format Article
series پژوهشهای زراعی ایران
spelling doaj.art-35c9030937c34479974f482d20775fcc2023-06-17T04:30:26ZfasFerdowsi University of Mashhadپژوهشهای زراعی ایران2008-14722423-39782023-06-0121215917110.22067/jcesc.2022.76465.116843251Evaluating the Sustainability of Canola Agroecosystems Using Energy Analysis, Carbon Footprint, and Greenhouse GasesH. R Shahhoseini0S Lotfi1H Kazemi2B Kamkar3PhD graduated of Agroecology, Department of Agronomy, University of Zabol, Zabol, IranM.Sc. Graduated of Agrotechnology, Department of Agronomy, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, IranDepartment of Agronomy, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, IranDepartment of Agroecothenology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, IranIntroductionIn recent decades, the need for increased food production has resulted in the expansion of intensified agriculture practices characterized by high consumption of inputs, thereby reducing agricultural sustainability. The agricultural sector's contribution to the world's energy consumption, ecological footprint, and greenhouse gas emissions has grown substantially. Emissions of greenhouse gases have negative ecological effects, including climate change, global warming, and diminished sustainable development. In this sector, energy analysis and greenhouse gas emissions in ecosystems are the most common methods for assessing sustainability. This study was conducted to evaluate the sustainability of canola agroecosystems by analyzing energy consumption, carbon footprint, and greenhouse gas emissions.Methods and MaterialsThe study was conducted using a questionnaire in Kalaleh County, in Golestan province, and gathering information from Golestan Agricultural Jihad Organization, during 2018-2019. The number of samples was determined by the Cochran formula. Accordingly, 50 farms were selected for canola cultivation. The questionnaire's reliability was determined to be 0.81. To calculate the energy indices, carbon footprint, and greenhouse gas emissions, after determining the most important inputs and output, first, their amounts were determined in each of the 50 farms and then their average was calculated. The energy equivalent of each input and output was calculated by multiplying its raw value by the corresponding energy conversion factor. The carbon footprint of the canola system was calculated as the amount of land required to absorb the environmental pollution caused by input and resource consumption. Carbon uptake in canola agroecosystems served as the basis for evaluating the carbon footprint and consequently the sustainability of this study. Also, the amount of greenhouse gases produced was determined by multiplying the raw values of the consumed inputs by their emission coefficient. Results and DiscussionIn canola agroecosystems, the total energy input was calculated to be 13,200 MJ ha-1, the total energy output was 63,400 MJ ha-1, the energy use efficiency was 4.8, and the energy productivity was 0.17 kg MJ-1. In addition, the ecological footprint and global warming potential were 0.99 gha and 779.03 CO2e ha−1, respectively. In canola production, fossil fuel and nitrogen fertilizer inputs contributed the most to ecological footprint and global warming potential respectively. Reducing the number of machines entering the farm through the application of conservation tillage methods and the modernization of machines can be effective in reducing the consumption of this input. Due to the non-renewability of this input, reducing its consumption is effective in reducing both economic costs and environmental pollution. Consuming as much livestock manure (cattle) as possible and implementing crop rotations with legumes such as soybeans that can grow well in this area is effective in supplying soil nitrogen and reducing the need for chemical fertilizers. ConclusionAnalysis of energy indices, such as energy efficiency and net energy, revealed that energy loss in the canola farming ecosystem is low and that the system's sustainability is adequate. Evaluation of carbon footprint revealed that the value of this index for canola production in the county of Kalaleh was less than the ecological capacity of each hectare of land used for canola production, indicating the environmental sustainability of canola production in the county of Kalaleh. In general, canola agroecosystems in the county of Kalaleh were sustainable based on terms of all three indices: net energy, carbon footprint, and global warming potential. Due to the large proportion of two inputs, fossil fuel, and nitrogen fertilizer, in these indices and their significant impact on production sustainability, consumption management of these inputs and training and justification of farmers are recommended to increase production sustainability.https://jcesc.um.ac.ir/article_43251_0e2a8cd5dd7884a03bb9a4d6c8c38ea5.pdfcarbon efficiencyecological capacityfossil fuelglobal warming potentialnitrogen fertilizer
spellingShingle H. R Shahhoseini
S Lotfi
H Kazemi
B Kamkar
Evaluating the Sustainability of Canola Agroecosystems Using Energy Analysis, Carbon Footprint, and Greenhouse Gases
پژوهشهای زراعی ایران
carbon efficiency
ecological capacity
fossil fuel
global warming potential
nitrogen fertilizer
title Evaluating the Sustainability of Canola Agroecosystems Using Energy Analysis, Carbon Footprint, and Greenhouse Gases
title_full Evaluating the Sustainability of Canola Agroecosystems Using Energy Analysis, Carbon Footprint, and Greenhouse Gases
title_fullStr Evaluating the Sustainability of Canola Agroecosystems Using Energy Analysis, Carbon Footprint, and Greenhouse Gases
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Sustainability of Canola Agroecosystems Using Energy Analysis, Carbon Footprint, and Greenhouse Gases
title_short Evaluating the Sustainability of Canola Agroecosystems Using Energy Analysis, Carbon Footprint, and Greenhouse Gases
title_sort evaluating the sustainability of canola agroecosystems using energy analysis carbon footprint and greenhouse gases
topic carbon efficiency
ecological capacity
fossil fuel
global warming potential
nitrogen fertilizer
url https://jcesc.um.ac.ir/article_43251_0e2a8cd5dd7884a03bb9a4d6c8c38ea5.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hrshahhoseini evaluatingthesustainabilityofcanolaagroecosystemsusingenergyanalysiscarbonfootprintandgreenhousegases
AT slotfi evaluatingthesustainabilityofcanolaagroecosystemsusingenergyanalysiscarbonfootprintandgreenhousegases
AT hkazemi evaluatingthesustainabilityofcanolaagroecosystemsusingenergyanalysiscarbonfootprintandgreenhousegases
AT bkamkar evaluatingthesustainabilityofcanolaagroecosystemsusingenergyanalysiscarbonfootprintandgreenhousegases