A state of constitutional necessity versus standard legal reasoning
<p>N.W. Barber and A. Vermeule, in their seminal paper, differentiate between three types of cases in which the exceptional role of courts can come to light. I will be interested only in the third type of cases, which has been defined by Barber and Vermeule as follows: ‘There are some cases in...
Main Author: | Tomasz Gizbert-Studnicki |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
|
Series: | Verfassungsblog |
Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/a-state-of-constitutional-necessity-versus-standard-legal-reasoning/ |
Similar Items
-
The most important problems of legal philosophy and the nature of law
by: Gizbert-Studnicki Tomasz
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Neo-Constitutionalism and Legal Reasoning
by: Alfonso García Figueroa
Published: (2017-11-01) -
From Agents to Consulado: Commercial Networks in Colonial Mexico, 1520-1590 and Beyond
by: Daviken Studnicki-Gizbert
Published: (2000-06-01) -
Constitutionalism and Legal Reasoning [electronic resources]/
by: 356353 La Torre, Massimo
Published: (2007) -
Deformation, erosion and sedimentation in collisional orogens : case studies from eastern Tibet and southwestern China
by: Studnicki-Gizbert, Christopher Terrance
Published: (2007)