RANKINGS UNIVERSITÁRIOS MUNDIAIS: ANÁLISE DA CONGRUÊNCIA ENTRE OBJETIVOS E INDICADORES
The international character of higher education takes students, universities and governments have a growing interest in knowing the position of universities compared to others in the global context. The rankings are attractive as they provide this information. However, each of the rankings developed...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
2018-01-01
|
| Series: | Revista Gestão Universitária na América Latina |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=319355896011 |
| _version_ | 1797656566043770880 |
|---|---|
| author | Sandra Mara Iesbik Valmorbida Thuine Lopes Cardoso Sandra Rolim Ensslin |
| author_facet | Sandra Mara Iesbik Valmorbida Thuine Lopes Cardoso Sandra Rolim Ensslin |
| author_sort | Sandra Mara Iesbik Valmorbida |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The international character of higher education takes students, universities and governments have a growing interest in knowing the position of universities compared to others in the global context. The rankings are attractive as they provide this information. However, each of the rankings developed makes use of indicators and metrics of measurement defined according to the purpose for which it was created. This work aims to investigate, based on scientific publications, if there is congruence between the indicators used by university rankings with the objectives for which the ranking was developed. For this search was conducted for scientific articles in web basis of Science and SCOPUS, which resulted in 25 articles were then examined. This is a bibliographic research, qualitative in nature, based on secondary data. So, first we identified the rankings presented by the work, and only analyzed those who appeared in four or more jobs: ARWU; THES; HEEACT; CWTS; Webometrics; SCImago; QS; America's Best College. Based on the analysis, it was found that the analyzed rankings, which presented their indicators, all present alignment of indicators and targets, although some cases are generic and superficial way. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T17:31:29Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-35d22aa048ff4398bcd76e3c1e077a5a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1983-4535 |
| language | Spanish |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T17:31:29Z |
| publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
| publisher | Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista Gestão Universitária na América Latina |
| spelling | doaj.art-35d22aa048ff4398bcd76e3c1e077a5a2023-10-18T21:28:47ZspaUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaRevista Gestão Universitária na América Latina1983-45352018-01-01111229252https://doi.org/10.5007/1983-4535.2018v11n1p229RANKINGS UNIVERSITÁRIOS MUNDIAIS: ANÁLISE DA CONGRUÊNCIA ENTRE OBJETIVOS E INDICADORESSandra Mara Iesbik ValmorbidaThuine Lopes CardosoSandra Rolim EnsslinThe international character of higher education takes students, universities and governments have a growing interest in knowing the position of universities compared to others in the global context. The rankings are attractive as they provide this information. However, each of the rankings developed makes use of indicators and metrics of measurement defined according to the purpose for which it was created. This work aims to investigate, based on scientific publications, if there is congruence between the indicators used by university rankings with the objectives for which the ranking was developed. For this search was conducted for scientific articles in web basis of Science and SCOPUS, which resulted in 25 articles were then examined. This is a bibliographic research, qualitative in nature, based on secondary data. So, first we identified the rankings presented by the work, and only analyzed those who appeared in four or more jobs: ARWU; THES; HEEACT; CWTS; Webometrics; SCImago; QS; America's Best College. Based on the analysis, it was found that the analyzed rankings, which presented their indicators, all present alignment of indicators and targets, although some cases are generic and superficial way.http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=319355896011university rankingsanalysis of the literatureperformance indicators |
| spellingShingle | Sandra Mara Iesbik Valmorbida Thuine Lopes Cardoso Sandra Rolim Ensslin RANKINGS UNIVERSITÁRIOS MUNDIAIS: ANÁLISE DA CONGRUÊNCIA ENTRE OBJETIVOS E INDICADORES Revista Gestão Universitária na América Latina university rankings analysis of the literature performance indicators |
| title | RANKINGS UNIVERSITÁRIOS MUNDIAIS: ANÁLISE DA CONGRUÊNCIA ENTRE OBJETIVOS E INDICADORES |
| title_full | RANKINGS UNIVERSITÁRIOS MUNDIAIS: ANÁLISE DA CONGRUÊNCIA ENTRE OBJETIVOS E INDICADORES |
| title_fullStr | RANKINGS UNIVERSITÁRIOS MUNDIAIS: ANÁLISE DA CONGRUÊNCIA ENTRE OBJETIVOS E INDICADORES |
| title_full_unstemmed | RANKINGS UNIVERSITÁRIOS MUNDIAIS: ANÁLISE DA CONGRUÊNCIA ENTRE OBJETIVOS E INDICADORES |
| title_short | RANKINGS UNIVERSITÁRIOS MUNDIAIS: ANÁLISE DA CONGRUÊNCIA ENTRE OBJETIVOS E INDICADORES |
| title_sort | rankings universitarios mundiais analise da congruencia entre objetivos e indicadores |
| topic | university rankings analysis of the literature performance indicators |
| url | http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=319355896011 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sandramaraiesbikvalmorbida rankingsuniversitariosmundiaisanalisedacongruenciaentreobjetivoseindicadores AT thuinelopescardoso rankingsuniversitariosmundiaisanalisedacongruenciaentreobjetivoseindicadores AT sandrarolimensslin rankingsuniversitariosmundiaisanalisedacongruenciaentreobjetivoseindicadores |