Identifying priority questions regarding rapid systematic reviews’ methods: protocol for an eDelphi study
Introduction Rapid systematic reviews (RRs) have the potential to provide timely information to decision-makers, thus directly impacting healthcare. However, consensus regarding the most efficient approaches to performing RRs and the presence of several unaddressed methodological issues pose challen...
Main Authors: | Andrea C Tricco, Peter Bragge, Laurenz Langer, Elie A Akl, John Lavis, Tanja Kuchenmüller, Jovana Stojanovic, Sandy Oliver, Simon Bacon, Chiara de Waure, Paula A B Ribeiro, Danielle Pollock, Ariany M Vieira, Geneviève Szczepanik |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023-07-01
|
Series: | BMJ Open |
Online Access: | https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/7/e069856.full |
Similar Items
-
A short list of high-priority indicators of health system responsiveness for aging: an eDelphi consensus study
by: Emmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01) -
Improving primary prevention of acute rheumatic fever in Australia: consensus primary care priorities identified through an eDelphi process
by: David Peiris, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Clinical Simulation in the Regulation of Software as a Medical Device: An eDelphi Study
by: Fiona O'Driscoll, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01) -
Clinical information quality of digital health technologies: protocol for an international eDelphi study
by: Fadahunsi, Kayode Philip, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Clinical information quality of digital health technologies: protocol for an international eDelphi study
by: Azeem Majeed, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)