Environmental DNA helps reveal reef shark distribution across a remote archipelago

Environmental DNA (eDNA) methods are being increasingly used in proof-of-concept studies to detect shark species, many populations of which are experiencing severe declines. These methods are widely seen as the future of biodiversity monitoring, but they have yet to become established as routine mon...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicholas Dunn, David J. Curnick, Chris Carbone, Aaron B. Carlisle, Taylor K. Chapple, Rosalie Dowell, Francesco Ferretti, David M.P. Jacoby, Robert J. Schallert, Margaux Steyaert, David M. Tickler, Michael J. Williamson, Barbara A. Block, Vincent Savolainen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-10-01
Series:Ecological Indicators
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X23008609
_version_ 1797683122529107968
author Nicholas Dunn
David J. Curnick
Chris Carbone
Aaron B. Carlisle
Taylor K. Chapple
Rosalie Dowell
Francesco Ferretti
David M.P. Jacoby
Robert J. Schallert
Margaux Steyaert
David M. Tickler
Michael J. Williamson
Barbara A. Block
Vincent Savolainen
author_facet Nicholas Dunn
David J. Curnick
Chris Carbone
Aaron B. Carlisle
Taylor K. Chapple
Rosalie Dowell
Francesco Ferretti
David M.P. Jacoby
Robert J. Schallert
Margaux Steyaert
David M. Tickler
Michael J. Williamson
Barbara A. Block
Vincent Savolainen
author_sort Nicholas Dunn
collection DOAJ
description Environmental DNA (eDNA) methods are being increasingly used in proof-of-concept studies to detect shark species, many populations of which are experiencing severe declines. These methods are widely seen as the future of biodiversity monitoring, but they have yet to become established as routine monitoring techniques for elasmobranch species. Here, we developed species-specific quantitative PCR assays for the detection of grey reef shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) and silvertip shark (Carcharhinus albimarginatus). We assessed whether species-specific eDNA methods could infer the distribution of the two species around the atolls of the Chagos Archipelago, which, despite being surrounded by a large marine protected area, experience contrasting levels of illegal fishing leading to heterogeneity in shark population densities. We found that eDNA detections were significantly reduced and sporadic around the northern atolls, which are under high pressure from illegal fishing. By contrast eDNA detections of both species were ubiquitous and consistent around the highly protected atoll Diego Garcia. We postulate that current levels of illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing is having a significant impact on the shark community in the northern atolls and suppressing local reef shark populations. In the northern atolls we also employed visual and acoustic telemetry techniques to reveal the distribution of reef sharks. We found that despite eDNA samples being taken directly after visual surveys, detection results did not correlate, suggesting a need for further optimisation of eDNA methods for detecting sharks. However, both species were detected by eDNA in sites where they were not observed, highlighting that the scale of the sampling environment must be considered when inferring eDNA results and showing that eDNA methods can be used to fill gaps in data from more established monitoring techniques. We conclude that eDNA methods should be used in combination with other techniques to provide a complete picture of shark distribution so that threatened species can be better protected.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:09:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-35d8265d91c745df952622206eab5f50
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1470-160X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:09:58Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Ecological Indicators
spelling doaj.art-35d8265d91c745df952622206eab5f502023-09-16T05:29:45ZengElsevierEcological Indicators1470-160X2023-10-01154110718Environmental DNA helps reveal reef shark distribution across a remote archipelagoNicholas Dunn0David J. Curnick1Chris Carbone2Aaron B. Carlisle3Taylor K. Chapple4Rosalie Dowell5Francesco Ferretti6David M.P. Jacoby7Robert J. Schallert8Margaux Steyaert9David M. Tickler10Michael J. Williamson11Barbara A. Block12Vincent Savolainen13Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London NW1 4RY, UK; Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, UKInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London NW1 4RY, UK; Corresponding author.Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London NW1 4RY, UKSchool of Marine Science and Policy, University of Delaware, Lewes, DE 19958, USAHatfield Marine Science Center, Oregon State University, 2030 SE Marine Science Drive Newport, OR 97365, USAInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London NW1 4RY, UK; Georgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, UKDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USALancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UKHopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USAInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London NW1 4RY, UK; Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UKSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009, Western Australia, AustraliaInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, London NW1 4RY, UKHopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USAGeorgina Mace Centre for the Living Planet, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, UKEnvironmental DNA (eDNA) methods are being increasingly used in proof-of-concept studies to detect shark species, many populations of which are experiencing severe declines. These methods are widely seen as the future of biodiversity monitoring, but they have yet to become established as routine monitoring techniques for elasmobranch species. Here, we developed species-specific quantitative PCR assays for the detection of grey reef shark (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos) and silvertip shark (Carcharhinus albimarginatus). We assessed whether species-specific eDNA methods could infer the distribution of the two species around the atolls of the Chagos Archipelago, which, despite being surrounded by a large marine protected area, experience contrasting levels of illegal fishing leading to heterogeneity in shark population densities. We found that eDNA detections were significantly reduced and sporadic around the northern atolls, which are under high pressure from illegal fishing. By contrast eDNA detections of both species were ubiquitous and consistent around the highly protected atoll Diego Garcia. We postulate that current levels of illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing is having a significant impact on the shark community in the northern atolls and suppressing local reef shark populations. In the northern atolls we also employed visual and acoustic telemetry techniques to reveal the distribution of reef sharks. We found that despite eDNA samples being taken directly after visual surveys, detection results did not correlate, suggesting a need for further optimisation of eDNA methods for detecting sharks. However, both species were detected by eDNA in sites where they were not observed, highlighting that the scale of the sampling environment must be considered when inferring eDNA results and showing that eDNA methods can be used to fill gaps in data from more established monitoring techniques. We conclude that eDNA methods should be used in combination with other techniques to provide a complete picture of shark distribution so that threatened species can be better protected.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X23008609eDNAElasmobranchIllegal fishingQuantitative PCRAcoustic telemetryUnderwater visual census
spellingShingle Nicholas Dunn
David J. Curnick
Chris Carbone
Aaron B. Carlisle
Taylor K. Chapple
Rosalie Dowell
Francesco Ferretti
David M.P. Jacoby
Robert J. Schallert
Margaux Steyaert
David M. Tickler
Michael J. Williamson
Barbara A. Block
Vincent Savolainen
Environmental DNA helps reveal reef shark distribution across a remote archipelago
Ecological Indicators
eDNA
Elasmobranch
Illegal fishing
Quantitative PCR
Acoustic telemetry
Underwater visual census
title Environmental DNA helps reveal reef shark distribution across a remote archipelago
title_full Environmental DNA helps reveal reef shark distribution across a remote archipelago
title_fullStr Environmental DNA helps reveal reef shark distribution across a remote archipelago
title_full_unstemmed Environmental DNA helps reveal reef shark distribution across a remote archipelago
title_short Environmental DNA helps reveal reef shark distribution across a remote archipelago
title_sort environmental dna helps reveal reef shark distribution across a remote archipelago
topic eDNA
Elasmobranch
Illegal fishing
Quantitative PCR
Acoustic telemetry
Underwater visual census
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X23008609
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholasdunn environmentaldnahelpsrevealreefsharkdistributionacrossaremotearchipelago
AT davidjcurnick environmentaldnahelpsrevealreefsharkdistributionacrossaremotearchipelago
AT chriscarbone environmentaldnahelpsrevealreefsharkdistributionacrossaremotearchipelago
AT aaronbcarlisle environmentaldnahelpsrevealreefsharkdistributionacrossaremotearchipelago
AT taylorkchapple environmentaldnahelpsrevealreefsharkdistributionacrossaremotearchipelago
AT rosaliedowell environmentaldnahelpsrevealreefsharkdistributionacrossaremotearchipelago
AT francescoferretti environmentaldnahelpsrevealreefsharkdistributionacrossaremotearchipelago
AT davidmpjacoby environmentaldnahelpsrevealreefsharkdistributionacrossaremotearchipelago
AT robertjschallert environmentaldnahelpsrevealreefsharkdistributionacrossaremotearchipelago
AT margauxsteyaert environmentaldnahelpsrevealreefsharkdistributionacrossaremotearchipelago
AT davidmtickler environmentaldnahelpsrevealreefsharkdistributionacrossaremotearchipelago
AT michaeljwilliamson environmentaldnahelpsrevealreefsharkdistributionacrossaremotearchipelago
AT barbaraablock environmentaldnahelpsrevealreefsharkdistributionacrossaremotearchipelago
AT vincentsavolainen environmentaldnahelpsrevealreefsharkdistributionacrossaremotearchipelago