Trends in the Care of Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of a National Cohort.

PURPOSE:To evaluate how the monitoring and treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) has changed in a national sample. DESIGN:Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: SETTING:Administrative medical claims data from a large, national U.S. insurer. STUDY POPULATION:Beneficiaries of a U.S. insurance compa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brian L VanderBeek, Neepa Shah, Purak C Parikh, Liyuan Ma
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4765886?pdf=render
_version_ 1818760179927220224
author Brian L VanderBeek
Neepa Shah
Purak C Parikh
Liyuan Ma
author_facet Brian L VanderBeek
Neepa Shah
Purak C Parikh
Liyuan Ma
author_sort Brian L VanderBeek
collection DOAJ
description PURPOSE:To evaluate how the monitoring and treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) has changed in a national sample. DESIGN:Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: SETTING:Administrative medical claims data from a large, national U.S. insurer. STUDY POPULATION:Beneficiaries of a U.S. insurance company. OBSERVATION PROCEDURES:All incident cases of DME were found. Those in years 2002/3, 2006 and 2010 were followed for a 2-year observation period and those from 2009, 2010 and 2011 for a 1-year observation period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Types and frequencies of treatment were tallied and compared over each of the cohorts. RESULTS:Two-year cohorts had 233, 251 and 756 patients in 2002/3, 2006 and 2010 respectively. One-year cohorts had 1002, 1119 and 1382 patients in 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively. Both percentage of patients receiving therapy and number of treatments given increased across the 2-year cohorts for both focal laser and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) (p<0.001). The highest use of anti-VEGF agents in any of the cohorts was in the 2011 1-year group that only averaged 3.78 injections. Focal laser was used 2.5x as frequently as anti-VEGF injections in the most recent cohorts with only a high of 14.0% of DME patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy in any of the cohorts. CONCLUSION:Regardless of treatment modality (laser or injection) DME patients received vastly fewer treatments than patients in randomized control trials. Despite the proven superior visual outcomes of anti-VEGF agents over focal laser in DME, focal laser was still used more frequently.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T06:54:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-35d992f2a2c24495b3fdfc9d394d33e1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T06:54:31Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-35d992f2a2c24495b3fdfc9d394d33e12022-12-21T21:17:13ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01112e014945010.1371/journal.pone.0149450Trends in the Care of Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of a National Cohort.Brian L VanderBeekNeepa ShahPurak C ParikhLiyuan MaPURPOSE:To evaluate how the monitoring and treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME) has changed in a national sample. DESIGN:Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: SETTING:Administrative medical claims data from a large, national U.S. insurer. STUDY POPULATION:Beneficiaries of a U.S. insurance company. OBSERVATION PROCEDURES:All incident cases of DME were found. Those in years 2002/3, 2006 and 2010 were followed for a 2-year observation period and those from 2009, 2010 and 2011 for a 1-year observation period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Types and frequencies of treatment were tallied and compared over each of the cohorts. RESULTS:Two-year cohorts had 233, 251 and 756 patients in 2002/3, 2006 and 2010 respectively. One-year cohorts had 1002, 1119 and 1382 patients in 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively. Both percentage of patients receiving therapy and number of treatments given increased across the 2-year cohorts for both focal laser and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) (p<0.001). The highest use of anti-VEGF agents in any of the cohorts was in the 2011 1-year group that only averaged 3.78 injections. Focal laser was used 2.5x as frequently as anti-VEGF injections in the most recent cohorts with only a high of 14.0% of DME patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy in any of the cohorts. CONCLUSION:Regardless of treatment modality (laser or injection) DME patients received vastly fewer treatments than patients in randomized control trials. Despite the proven superior visual outcomes of anti-VEGF agents over focal laser in DME, focal laser was still used more frequently.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4765886?pdf=render
spellingShingle Brian L VanderBeek
Neepa Shah
Purak C Parikh
Liyuan Ma
Trends in the Care of Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of a National Cohort.
PLoS ONE
title Trends in the Care of Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of a National Cohort.
title_full Trends in the Care of Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of a National Cohort.
title_fullStr Trends in the Care of Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of a National Cohort.
title_full_unstemmed Trends in the Care of Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of a National Cohort.
title_short Trends in the Care of Diabetic Macular Edema: Analysis of a National Cohort.
title_sort trends in the care of diabetic macular edema analysis of a national cohort
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4765886?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT brianlvanderbeek trendsinthecareofdiabeticmacularedemaanalysisofanationalcohort
AT neepashah trendsinthecareofdiabeticmacularedemaanalysisofanationalcohort
AT purakcparikh trendsinthecareofdiabeticmacularedemaanalysisofanationalcohort
AT liyuanma trendsinthecareofdiabeticmacularedemaanalysisofanationalcohort