Electrocardiographic signs of impaired depolarization (fragmented QRS, early ventricular repolarization, etc.) as markers of left ventricular systolic dysfunction

Aim. To study the relationship between a decrease in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and conventional electrocardiographic (ECG) signs associated with myocardial structure changes (pathological Q wave, ventricular arrhythmias), and relatively novel and less studied (fragmented QRS (fQRS...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. S. Gordeeva, I. A. Serdiukova, A. S. Krasichkov, E. V. Parmon
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: «FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC 2022-08-01
Series:Российский кардиологический журнал
Subjects:
Online Access:https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/5113
_version_ 1826560980991082496
author M. S. Gordeeva
I. A. Serdiukova
A. S. Krasichkov
E. V. Parmon
author_facet M. S. Gordeeva
I. A. Serdiukova
A. S. Krasichkov
E. V. Parmon
author_sort M. S. Gordeeva
collection DOAJ
description Aim. To study the relationship between a decrease in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and conventional electrocardiographic (ECG) signs associated with myocardial structure changes (pathological Q wave, ventricular arrhythmias), and relatively novel and less studied (fragmented QRS (fQRS), early ventricular repolarization (EVR)) and to evaluate their significance for identifying patients with mildly-reduced EF (mrEF).Material and methods. The study included 148 patients who were treated and examined at the Almazov National Medical Research Center. During the ECG analysis, fQRS, EVR, pathological Q wave, and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) were assessed. Echocardiography data were analyzed. Statistical processing was carried out, including Fisher and chi-squared test, as well as correlation and ROC analysis.Results. Depending on the EF level, patients were divided into three groups: group 1 — patients with reduced EF (rEF) (<40%); group 2 — patients with mrEF (40-49%); group 3 — patients with preserved EF (pEF) (>50%). In the 1st group (with rEF), fQRS was registered in 16 (51,6%) patients, in the 2nd (with mrEF) — in 13 (44,8%), in the 3rd (with EF >50%) — in 16 (18,2%). Pathological Q wave was detected in the 1st group (rEF) in 20 (65%) patients, in the 2nd (mrEF) — in 10 (35%); in the 3rd (pEF) — in 15 (18%) (p<0,001). ROC analysis found that fQRS is more important for identifying patients with mrEF. In the 1st group (rEF), EVR was registered in 2 (6,5%) patients, in the 2nd (pEF) — in 2 (6,9%), in the 3rd (EF>50%) — in 11 (12,5%); the differences were not significant (p=0,5). The relationship of EVR, the number of PVCs and the presence of ventricular tachycardia with EF was not revealed.Conclusion. FQRS is significantly more often observed with a decrease in EF and may be a marker of an mildly-reduced EF. There were no significant correlations between EVR and EF. There was also no relationship between VAs and LV systolic dysfunction.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T20:43:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-35de216cdf7c423e93d31d7becd6d24e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1560-4071
2618-7620
language Russian
last_indexed 2025-03-14T09:24:54Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher «FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC
record_format Article
series Российский кардиологический журнал
spelling doaj.art-35de216cdf7c423e93d31d7becd6d24e2025-03-02T11:42:58Zrus«FIRMA «SILICEA» LLCРоссийский кардиологический журнал1560-40712618-76202022-08-0127710.15829/1560-4071-2022-51133606Electrocardiographic signs of impaired depolarization (fragmented QRS, early ventricular repolarization, etc.) as markers of left ventricular systolic dysfunctionM. S. Gordeeva0I. A. Serdiukova1A. S. Krasichkov2E. V. Parmon3Almazov National Medical Research CentreSaint Petersburg Electrotechnical University LETISaint Petersburg Electrotechnical University LETIAlmazov National Medical Research CentreAim. To study the relationship between a decrease in left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and conventional electrocardiographic (ECG) signs associated with myocardial structure changes (pathological Q wave, ventricular arrhythmias), and relatively novel and less studied (fragmented QRS (fQRS), early ventricular repolarization (EVR)) and to evaluate their significance for identifying patients with mildly-reduced EF (mrEF).Material and methods. The study included 148 patients who were treated and examined at the Almazov National Medical Research Center. During the ECG analysis, fQRS, EVR, pathological Q wave, and ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) were assessed. Echocardiography data were analyzed. Statistical processing was carried out, including Fisher and chi-squared test, as well as correlation and ROC analysis.Results. Depending on the EF level, patients were divided into three groups: group 1 — patients with reduced EF (rEF) (<40%); group 2 — patients with mrEF (40-49%); group 3 — patients with preserved EF (pEF) (>50%). In the 1st group (with rEF), fQRS was registered in 16 (51,6%) patients, in the 2nd (with mrEF) — in 13 (44,8%), in the 3rd (with EF >50%) — in 16 (18,2%). Pathological Q wave was detected in the 1st group (rEF) in 20 (65%) patients, in the 2nd (mrEF) — in 10 (35%); in the 3rd (pEF) — in 15 (18%) (p<0,001). ROC analysis found that fQRS is more important for identifying patients with mrEF. In the 1st group (rEF), EVR was registered in 2 (6,5%) patients, in the 2nd (pEF) — in 2 (6,9%), in the 3rd (EF>50%) — in 11 (12,5%); the differences were not significant (p=0,5). The relationship of EVR, the number of PVCs and the presence of ventricular tachycardia with EF was not revealed.Conclusion. FQRS is significantly more often observed with a decrease in EF and may be a marker of an mildly-reduced EF. There were no significant correlations between EVR and EF. There was also no relationship between VAs and LV systolic dysfunction.https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/5113fragmentationearly repolarization phenomenonheart failureelectrocardiographymildly-reduced ejection fraction
spellingShingle M. S. Gordeeva
I. A. Serdiukova
A. S. Krasichkov
E. V. Parmon
Electrocardiographic signs of impaired depolarization (fragmented QRS, early ventricular repolarization, etc.) as markers of left ventricular systolic dysfunction
Российский кардиологический журнал
fragmentation
early repolarization phenomenon
heart failure
electrocardiography
mildly-reduced ejection fraction
title Electrocardiographic signs of impaired depolarization (fragmented QRS, early ventricular repolarization, etc.) as markers of left ventricular systolic dysfunction
title_full Electrocardiographic signs of impaired depolarization (fragmented QRS, early ventricular repolarization, etc.) as markers of left ventricular systolic dysfunction
title_fullStr Electrocardiographic signs of impaired depolarization (fragmented QRS, early ventricular repolarization, etc.) as markers of left ventricular systolic dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Electrocardiographic signs of impaired depolarization (fragmented QRS, early ventricular repolarization, etc.) as markers of left ventricular systolic dysfunction
title_short Electrocardiographic signs of impaired depolarization (fragmented QRS, early ventricular repolarization, etc.) as markers of left ventricular systolic dysfunction
title_sort electrocardiographic signs of impaired depolarization fragmented qrs early ventricular repolarization etc as markers of left ventricular systolic dysfunction
topic fragmentation
early repolarization phenomenon
heart failure
electrocardiography
mildly-reduced ejection fraction
url https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/5113
work_keys_str_mv AT msgordeeva electrocardiographicsignsofimpaireddepolarizationfragmentedqrsearlyventricularrepolarizationetcasmarkersofleftventricularsystolicdysfunction
AT iaserdiukova electrocardiographicsignsofimpaireddepolarizationfragmentedqrsearlyventricularrepolarizationetcasmarkersofleftventricularsystolicdysfunction
AT askrasichkov electrocardiographicsignsofimpaireddepolarizationfragmentedqrsearlyventricularrepolarizationetcasmarkersofleftventricularsystolicdysfunction
AT evparmon electrocardiographicsignsofimpaireddepolarizationfragmentedqrsearlyventricularrepolarizationetcasmarkersofleftventricularsystolicdysfunction