But seriously: what do algorithms want? Implying collective intentionalities in algorithmic relays. A distributed cognition approach

Describing an algorithm can provide a formalization of a specific process. However, different ways of conceptualizing algorithms foreground certain issues while obscuring others. This article attempts to define an algorithm in a broad sense as a cultural activity of key importance to make sense of s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Javier Toscano
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Copernicus Center Press 2022-12-01
Series:Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce
Subjects:
Online Access:https://zfn.edu.pl/index.php/zfn/article/view/596
_version_ 1811154576587358208
author Javier Toscano
author_facet Javier Toscano
author_sort Javier Toscano
collection DOAJ
description Describing an algorithm can provide a formalization of a specific process. However, different ways of conceptualizing algorithms foreground certain issues while obscuring others. This article attempts to define an algorithm in a broad sense as a cultural activity of key importance to make sense of socio-cognitive structures. It also attempts to develop a sharper account on the interaction between humans and tools, symbols and technologies. Rather than human or machine-centered analyses, I draw upon sociological and anthropological theories that underline social practices to propose expanding our understanding of an algorithm through the notion of ‘collective intentionalities’. To make this term clear, a brief historical review is presented, followed by an argumentation on how to incorporate it in an integral perspective. The article responds to recent debates in critical algorithm studies about the significance of the term. It develops a discussion along the lines of cognitive anthropology and the cognitive sciences, therefore advancing a definition that is grounded in observed practices as well as in modeled descriptions. The benefit of this approach is that it encourages scholars to explore cognitive structures via archaeologies of technological assemblages, where intentionalities play a defining role in understanding socio-structured practices and cognitive ecologies.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:19:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-35f4b07ecc6b4e09b1cfcafceae94306
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0867-8286
2451-0602
language deu
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:19:22Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Copernicus Center Press
record_format Article
series Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce
spelling doaj.art-35f4b07ecc6b4e09b1cfcafceae943062023-03-11T12:18:23ZdeuCopernicus Center PressZagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce0867-82862451-06022022-12-01734776544But seriously: what do algorithms want? Implying collective intentionalities in algorithmic relays. A distributed cognition approachJavier Toscano0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8317-8311CAIS, Center for Advanced Internet StudiesDescribing an algorithm can provide a formalization of a specific process. However, different ways of conceptualizing algorithms foreground certain issues while obscuring others. This article attempts to define an algorithm in a broad sense as a cultural activity of key importance to make sense of socio-cognitive structures. It also attempts to develop a sharper account on the interaction between humans and tools, symbols and technologies. Rather than human or machine-centered analyses, I draw upon sociological and anthropological theories that underline social practices to propose expanding our understanding of an algorithm through the notion of ‘collective intentionalities’. To make this term clear, a brief historical review is presented, followed by an argumentation on how to incorporate it in an integral perspective. The article responds to recent debates in critical algorithm studies about the significance of the term. It develops a discussion along the lines of cognitive anthropology and the cognitive sciences, therefore advancing a definition that is grounded in observed practices as well as in modeled descriptions. The benefit of this approach is that it encourages scholars to explore cognitive structures via archaeologies of technological assemblages, where intentionalities play a defining role in understanding socio-structured practices and cognitive ecologies.https://zfn.edu.pl/index.php/zfn/article/view/596algorithm studiesdistributed cognitioncollective intentionalitiessocio-computing infrastructurescognitive anthropology
spellingShingle Javier Toscano
But seriously: what do algorithms want? Implying collective intentionalities in algorithmic relays. A distributed cognition approach
Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce
algorithm studies
distributed cognition
collective intentionalities
socio-computing infrastructures
cognitive anthropology
title But seriously: what do algorithms want? Implying collective intentionalities in algorithmic relays. A distributed cognition approach
title_full But seriously: what do algorithms want? Implying collective intentionalities in algorithmic relays. A distributed cognition approach
title_fullStr But seriously: what do algorithms want? Implying collective intentionalities in algorithmic relays. A distributed cognition approach
title_full_unstemmed But seriously: what do algorithms want? Implying collective intentionalities in algorithmic relays. A distributed cognition approach
title_short But seriously: what do algorithms want? Implying collective intentionalities in algorithmic relays. A distributed cognition approach
title_sort but seriously what do algorithms want implying collective intentionalities in algorithmic relays a distributed cognition approach
topic algorithm studies
distributed cognition
collective intentionalities
socio-computing infrastructures
cognitive anthropology
url https://zfn.edu.pl/index.php/zfn/article/view/596
work_keys_str_mv AT javiertoscano butseriouslywhatdoalgorithmswantimplyingcollectiveintentionalitiesinalgorithmicrelaysadistributedcognitionapproach