PV Temperature Prediction Incorporating the Effect of Humidity and Cooling Due to Seawater Flow and Evaporation on Modules Simulating Floating PV Conditions

The temperature prediction for floating PV (FPV) must account for the effect of humidity. In this work, PV temperature prediction for steady-state T<sub>pv</sub> and transient conditions T<sub>pv</sub>(t) incorporates the effect of humidity and cooling due to seawater (s.w.)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Socrates Kaplanis, Eleni Kaplani, John K. Kaldellis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:Energies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/12/4756
_version_ 1797595025002987520
author Socrates Kaplanis
Eleni Kaplani
John K. Kaldellis
author_facet Socrates Kaplanis
Eleni Kaplani
John K. Kaldellis
author_sort Socrates Kaplanis
collection DOAJ
description The temperature prediction for floating PV (FPV) must account for the effect of humidity. In this work, PV temperature prediction for steady-state T<sub>pv</sub> and transient conditions T<sub>pv</sub>(t) incorporates the effect of humidity and cooling due to seawater (s.w.) splashing and evaporation on PV modules. The proposed formulas take as main inputs the in-plane solar irradiance<sub>,</sub> wind speed, ambient temperature, relative humidity (RH), and s.w. temperature. The transient effects of s.w. splashing and the evaporation of the s.w. layer from the module are theoretically described considering the layer’s thickness using Navier–Stokes equations. T<sub>pv</sub> and T<sub>pv</sub>(t) measurements were taken before and after s.w. splashing on c-Si modules at the seashore and inland. PV temperature predictions compared to measured values showed very good agreement. The 55% RH at the seashore versus 45% inland caused the T<sub>pv</sub> to decrease by 18%. The T<sub>pv</sub>(t) at the end of the s.w. flow of 50–75 mL/s/m on the module at the seashore was 35–51% lower than the T<sub>pv</sub> inland. This T<sub>pv</sub>(t) profile depends on the s.w. splashing, lasts for about 1 min, and is attributed to higher convection, water cooling, and evaporation on the modules. The PV efficiency at FPV conditions was estimated to be 4–11.5% higher compared to inland.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T02:30:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-35fa656fe79d47f4ab6a0876435dc2e9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1073
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T02:30:37Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Energies
spelling doaj.art-35fa656fe79d47f4ab6a0876435dc2e92023-11-18T10:13:42ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732023-06-011612475610.3390/en16124756PV Temperature Prediction Incorporating the Effect of Humidity and Cooling Due to Seawater Flow and Evaporation on Modules Simulating Floating PV ConditionsSocrates Kaplanis0Eleni Kaplani1John K. Kaldellis2Laboratory of Soft Energy Applications and Environmental Protection, University of West Attica, 12201 Athens, GreeceSchool of Engineering, Faculty of Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UKLaboratory of Soft Energy Applications and Environmental Protection, University of West Attica, 12201 Athens, GreeceThe temperature prediction for floating PV (FPV) must account for the effect of humidity. In this work, PV temperature prediction for steady-state T<sub>pv</sub> and transient conditions T<sub>pv</sub>(t) incorporates the effect of humidity and cooling due to seawater (s.w.) splashing and evaporation on PV modules. The proposed formulas take as main inputs the in-plane solar irradiance<sub>,</sub> wind speed, ambient temperature, relative humidity (RH), and s.w. temperature. The transient effects of s.w. splashing and the evaporation of the s.w. layer from the module are theoretically described considering the layer’s thickness using Navier–Stokes equations. T<sub>pv</sub> and T<sub>pv</sub>(t) measurements were taken before and after s.w. splashing on c-Si modules at the seashore and inland. PV temperature predictions compared to measured values showed very good agreement. The 55% RH at the seashore versus 45% inland caused the T<sub>pv</sub> to decrease by 18%. The T<sub>pv</sub>(t) at the end of the s.w. flow of 50–75 mL/s/m on the module at the seashore was 35–51% lower than the T<sub>pv</sub> inland. This T<sub>pv</sub>(t) profile depends on the s.w. splashing, lasts for about 1 min, and is attributed to higher convection, water cooling, and evaporation on the modules. The PV efficiency at FPV conditions was estimated to be 4–11.5% higher compared to inland.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/12/4756seawater PV coolingevaporation coolinghumidity enhanced convectionPV temperature profilesFPV
spellingShingle Socrates Kaplanis
Eleni Kaplani
John K. Kaldellis
PV Temperature Prediction Incorporating the Effect of Humidity and Cooling Due to Seawater Flow and Evaporation on Modules Simulating Floating PV Conditions
Energies
seawater PV cooling
evaporation cooling
humidity enhanced convection
PV temperature profiles
FPV
title PV Temperature Prediction Incorporating the Effect of Humidity and Cooling Due to Seawater Flow and Evaporation on Modules Simulating Floating PV Conditions
title_full PV Temperature Prediction Incorporating the Effect of Humidity and Cooling Due to Seawater Flow and Evaporation on Modules Simulating Floating PV Conditions
title_fullStr PV Temperature Prediction Incorporating the Effect of Humidity and Cooling Due to Seawater Flow and Evaporation on Modules Simulating Floating PV Conditions
title_full_unstemmed PV Temperature Prediction Incorporating the Effect of Humidity and Cooling Due to Seawater Flow and Evaporation on Modules Simulating Floating PV Conditions
title_short PV Temperature Prediction Incorporating the Effect of Humidity and Cooling Due to Seawater Flow and Evaporation on Modules Simulating Floating PV Conditions
title_sort pv temperature prediction incorporating the effect of humidity and cooling due to seawater flow and evaporation on modules simulating floating pv conditions
topic seawater PV cooling
evaporation cooling
humidity enhanced convection
PV temperature profiles
FPV
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/12/4756
work_keys_str_mv AT socrateskaplanis pvtemperaturepredictionincorporatingtheeffectofhumidityandcoolingduetoseawaterflowandevaporationonmodulessimulatingfloatingpvconditions
AT elenikaplani pvtemperaturepredictionincorporatingtheeffectofhumidityandcoolingduetoseawaterflowandevaporationonmodulessimulatingfloatingpvconditions
AT johnkkaldellis pvtemperaturepredictionincorporatingtheeffectofhumidityandcoolingduetoseawaterflowandevaporationonmodulessimulatingfloatingpvconditions