Self-Construals, Anger Regulation, and Life Satisfaction in the United States and Japan

Previous studies have reported evidence that indicates differences between Western and East Asian cultures in anger regulation and its psychological consequences. However, many of these studies have focused on a specific anger regulation strategy and its relation with a psychological consequence. He...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Satoshi eAkutsu, Ayano eYamaguchi, Min-Sun eKim, Atsushi eOshio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00768/full
_version_ 1818362194669076480
author Satoshi eAkutsu
Ayano eYamaguchi
Min-Sun eKim
Atsushi eOshio
author_facet Satoshi eAkutsu
Ayano eYamaguchi
Min-Sun eKim
Atsushi eOshio
author_sort Satoshi eAkutsu
collection DOAJ
description Previous studies have reported evidence that indicates differences between Western and East Asian cultures in anger regulation and its psychological consequences. However, many of these studies have focused on a specific anger regulation strategy and its relation with a psychological consequence. Here, we developed an integrated model that can comprehensively examine three different anger regulation strategies (anger suppression, expression, and control), independent and interdependent self-construals as the psychological antecedent, and life satisfaction as the psychological consequence. We estimated the model using large samples of American and Japanese adults to examine the associations between the two self-construals, three anger regulation strategies, and life satisfaction. We compared the difference in the patterns of relationships among the key constructs between the American and Japanese samples. The results confirmed previously suggested cultural differences while also discovering new culturally different paths. The results generally suggest that individual-level self-construals matter more when anger is a culturally condoned emotion (vs. condemned). The implications and limitations of the integrated model are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T21:28:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-35faad9d77cc4c5e8ad6cfe3ab30dd4c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T21:28:42Z
publishDate 2016-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-35faad9d77cc4c5e8ad6cfe3ab30dd4c2022-12-21T23:30:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782016-05-01710.3389/fpsyg.2016.00768186510Self-Construals, Anger Regulation, and Life Satisfaction in the United States and JapanSatoshi eAkutsu0Ayano eYamaguchi1Min-Sun eKim2Atsushi eOshio3Hitotsubashi UniversityNational Graduate Institute for Policy StudiesUniversity of HawaiiWaseda UniversityPrevious studies have reported evidence that indicates differences between Western and East Asian cultures in anger regulation and its psychological consequences. However, many of these studies have focused on a specific anger regulation strategy and its relation with a psychological consequence. Here, we developed an integrated model that can comprehensively examine three different anger regulation strategies (anger suppression, expression, and control), independent and interdependent self-construals as the psychological antecedent, and life satisfaction as the psychological consequence. We estimated the model using large samples of American and Japanese adults to examine the associations between the two self-construals, three anger regulation strategies, and life satisfaction. We compared the difference in the patterns of relationships among the key constructs between the American and Japanese samples. The results confirmed previously suggested cultural differences while also discovering new culturally different paths. The results generally suggest that individual-level self-construals matter more when anger is a culturally condoned emotion (vs. condemned). The implications and limitations of the integrated model are discussed.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00768/fullcultureInterdependenceindependencelife satisfactionanger regulation
spellingShingle Satoshi eAkutsu
Ayano eYamaguchi
Min-Sun eKim
Atsushi eOshio
Self-Construals, Anger Regulation, and Life Satisfaction in the United States and Japan
Frontiers in Psychology
culture
Interdependence
independence
life satisfaction
anger regulation
title Self-Construals, Anger Regulation, and Life Satisfaction in the United States and Japan
title_full Self-Construals, Anger Regulation, and Life Satisfaction in the United States and Japan
title_fullStr Self-Construals, Anger Regulation, and Life Satisfaction in the United States and Japan
title_full_unstemmed Self-Construals, Anger Regulation, and Life Satisfaction in the United States and Japan
title_short Self-Construals, Anger Regulation, and Life Satisfaction in the United States and Japan
title_sort self construals anger regulation and life satisfaction in the united states and japan
topic culture
Interdependence
independence
life satisfaction
anger regulation
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00768/full
work_keys_str_mv AT satoshieakutsu selfconstrualsangerregulationandlifesatisfactionintheunitedstatesandjapan
AT ayanoeyamaguchi selfconstrualsangerregulationandlifesatisfactionintheunitedstatesandjapan
AT minsunekim selfconstrualsangerregulationandlifesatisfactionintheunitedstatesandjapan
AT atsushieoshio selfconstrualsangerregulationandlifesatisfactionintheunitedstatesandjapan