Effect of Storage Methods and Period on the Physiological and Nutrient Components of Livingstone Potato (Plectranthus esculentus) in Abia State, Nigeria

Livingstone potato production in Nigeria is faced with the challenge of high postharvest losses. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of some storage methods on the physiological and nutritional quality of livingstone potato. Potatoes were separated and stored using eight different methods...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ezeocha Chinelo Vanessa, Ironkwe Adanma G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2017-02-01
Series:Open Agriculture
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2017-0022
_version_ 1818597441105035264
author Ezeocha Chinelo Vanessa
Ironkwe Adanma G.
author_facet Ezeocha Chinelo Vanessa
Ironkwe Adanma G.
author_sort Ezeocha Chinelo Vanessa
collection DOAJ
description Livingstone potato production in Nigeria is faced with the challenge of high postharvest losses. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of some storage methods on the physiological and nutritional quality of livingstone potato. Potatoes were separated and stored using eight different methods: potatoes stored in3x3x3 ft pits and covered with sand under the shade (T1), potatoes stored in3x3x3 ft pits and covered with ash under the shade (T2), potatoes stored in3x3x3 ft pits and covered with rice husk under the shade (T3), potatoes stored in3x3x3 ft pits and covered with a wood shavings under the shade (T4), potatoes spread on a bamboo platform under the shade(T5), potatoes spread on a raffia palm platform under the shade(T6), potatoes spread on concrete pavement inside the barn (T7), potatoes spread on the ground under the shade(T8), potatoes buried under the ground (T9). T8 was used as the control treatment. Temperature and relative humidity of the environment was monitored, the roots were weighed monthly to access the weight loss, sprouting and rot were observed visually and proximate composition of the stored roots were evaluated using standard methods. The lowest percentage weight loss was observed in samples stored in a pit covered with wood ash and those covered with river sand. Samples stored in pits and covered with wood shavings, wood ash and river sand had the lowest percentage of sprouting (1.63%, 3.45% and 6.06% respectively). The dry matter content increased with storage period in all the storage methods. The starch yield varied in the different storage methods with the samplescovered with river sand (13.45%) and the samples buried underground in the field(10.53%) giving the highest starch yield at the end of the storage period. Samples stored under rice husk had the highest ash content (4.77%) while the crude fibre and crude protein contents were highest in the samples spread on raffia palm. The results showed that spreading on the floor or on top of pavements are not good storage methods for living stone potato, however, storage in pits with alternate layers of river sand, wood ash and wood shavings are the best storage methods for livingstone potato.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T11:47:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-35fd2902399347f3a7e480249921bbd7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2391-9531
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T11:47:51Z
publishDate 2017-02-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Open Agriculture
spelling doaj.art-35fd2902399347f3a7e480249921bbd72022-12-21T22:32:48ZengDe GruyterOpen Agriculture2391-95312017-02-012121321910.1515/opag-2017-0022opag-2017-0022Effect of Storage Methods and Period on the Physiological and Nutrient Components of Livingstone Potato (Plectranthus esculentus) in Abia State, NigeriaEzeocha Chinelo Vanessa0Ironkwe Adanma G.1Department of Food Science and Technology, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, NigeriaMinor Root Crops Programme, National Root Crops Research Institute, Umudike, PMB 7006, Umuahia, Abia state, NigeriaLivingstone potato production in Nigeria is faced with the challenge of high postharvest losses. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of some storage methods on the physiological and nutritional quality of livingstone potato. Potatoes were separated and stored using eight different methods: potatoes stored in3x3x3 ft pits and covered with sand under the shade (T1), potatoes stored in3x3x3 ft pits and covered with ash under the shade (T2), potatoes stored in3x3x3 ft pits and covered with rice husk under the shade (T3), potatoes stored in3x3x3 ft pits and covered with a wood shavings under the shade (T4), potatoes spread on a bamboo platform under the shade(T5), potatoes spread on a raffia palm platform under the shade(T6), potatoes spread on concrete pavement inside the barn (T7), potatoes spread on the ground under the shade(T8), potatoes buried under the ground (T9). T8 was used as the control treatment. Temperature and relative humidity of the environment was monitored, the roots were weighed monthly to access the weight loss, sprouting and rot were observed visually and proximate composition of the stored roots were evaluated using standard methods. The lowest percentage weight loss was observed in samples stored in a pit covered with wood ash and those covered with river sand. Samples stored in pits and covered with wood shavings, wood ash and river sand had the lowest percentage of sprouting (1.63%, 3.45% and 6.06% respectively). The dry matter content increased with storage period in all the storage methods. The starch yield varied in the different storage methods with the samplescovered with river sand (13.45%) and the samples buried underground in the field(10.53%) giving the highest starch yield at the end of the storage period. Samples stored under rice husk had the highest ash content (4.77%) while the crude fibre and crude protein contents were highest in the samples spread on raffia palm. The results showed that spreading on the floor or on top of pavements are not good storage methods for living stone potato, however, storage in pits with alternate layers of river sand, wood ash and wood shavings are the best storage methods for livingstone potato.https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2017-0022storagelivingstone potatonutrient componentsweight-losssproutingstorage
spellingShingle Ezeocha Chinelo Vanessa
Ironkwe Adanma G.
Effect of Storage Methods and Period on the Physiological and Nutrient Components of Livingstone Potato (Plectranthus esculentus) in Abia State, Nigeria
Open Agriculture
storage
livingstone potato
nutrient components
weight-loss
sprouting
storage
title Effect of Storage Methods and Period on the Physiological and Nutrient Components of Livingstone Potato (Plectranthus esculentus) in Abia State, Nigeria
title_full Effect of Storage Methods and Period on the Physiological and Nutrient Components of Livingstone Potato (Plectranthus esculentus) in Abia State, Nigeria
title_fullStr Effect of Storage Methods and Period on the Physiological and Nutrient Components of Livingstone Potato (Plectranthus esculentus) in Abia State, Nigeria
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Storage Methods and Period on the Physiological and Nutrient Components of Livingstone Potato (Plectranthus esculentus) in Abia State, Nigeria
title_short Effect of Storage Methods and Period on the Physiological and Nutrient Components of Livingstone Potato (Plectranthus esculentus) in Abia State, Nigeria
title_sort effect of storage methods and period on the physiological and nutrient components of livingstone potato plectranthus esculentus in abia state nigeria
topic storage
livingstone potato
nutrient components
weight-loss
sprouting
storage
url https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2017-0022
work_keys_str_mv AT ezeochachinelovanessa effectofstoragemethodsandperiodonthephysiologicalandnutrientcomponentsoflivingstonepotatoplectranthusesculentusinabiastatenigeria
AT ironkweadanmag effectofstoragemethodsandperiodonthephysiologicalandnutrientcomponentsoflivingstonepotatoplectranthusesculentusinabiastatenigeria