Efficacy of stimulants for preschool attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract Background Robust synthesis of evidence to support treatment recommendations for preschoolers with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is lacking. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to review currently available evidence to evaluate the efficacy and acceptab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luisa S. Sugaya, Luis C. Farhat, Pietro Califano, Guilherme V. Polanczyk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-09-01
Series:JCPP Advances
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12146
_version_ 1797685490841812992
author Luisa S. Sugaya
Luis C. Farhat
Pietro Califano
Guilherme V. Polanczyk
author_facet Luisa S. Sugaya
Luis C. Farhat
Pietro Califano
Guilherme V. Polanczyk
author_sort Luisa S. Sugaya
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Robust synthesis of evidence to support treatment recommendations for preschoolers with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is lacking. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to review currently available evidence to evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of stimulants for preschool children with ADHD. Methods We searched electronic databases (CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed) from the database inception to March, 2022; and clinical trial registries through WHO ICTRP from the database inception to July, 2022, and selected double‐blinded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared stimulants against placebo for the treatment of preschoolers (age ≤ 7 years) with ADHD. Change in ADHD symptom severity was the primary outcome (efficacy) and all‐cause dropout rates (acceptability) was the secondary outcome. Data were pooled with random‐effects models weighted by the inverse of the variance. Risk of bias of individual studies were assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022348597). Results Five RCTs (three methylphenidate immediate‐release, one methylphenidate extended‐release, and one lisdexamfetamine) were included. The analysis of efficacy was based on 489 participants. Meta‐analysis of change in ADHD symptom severity demonstrated a significant effect in favor of stimulants over placebo (standardized mean difference = −0.59; 95% CI −0.77, −0.41; p < 0.0001). There was no evidence of heterogeneity but some concerns about publication bias. Regardless, the confidence of evidence was considered moderate. For acceptability, stimulants did not lead to an increased rate of all‐cause discontinuation rates in comparison to placebo (OR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.15, 2.37; p = 0.45) but the confidence of estimate was very low. Conclusions Our findings demonstrated that stimulants are efficacious in reducing ADHD symptoms among preschool children. Clinicians should consider the use of stimulants when making treatment recommendations for preschoolers with ADHD.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T00:44:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3618697706c54cb5a0e604c0d5f982f8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2692-9384
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T00:44:55Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series JCPP Advances
spelling doaj.art-3618697706c54cb5a0e604c0d5f982f82023-09-14T18:26:41ZengWileyJCPP Advances2692-93842023-09-0133n/an/a10.1002/jcv2.12146Efficacy of stimulants for preschool attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta‐analysisLuisa S. Sugaya0Luis C. Farhat1Pietro Califano2Guilherme V. Polanczyk3Department of Psychiatry Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo BrazilDepartment of Psychiatry Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo BrazilDepartment of Psychiatry Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo BrazilDepartment of Psychiatry Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo BrazilAbstract Background Robust synthesis of evidence to support treatment recommendations for preschoolers with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is lacking. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to review currently available evidence to evaluate the efficacy and acceptability of stimulants for preschool children with ADHD. Methods We searched electronic databases (CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed) from the database inception to March, 2022; and clinical trial registries through WHO ICTRP from the database inception to July, 2022, and selected double‐blinded randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared stimulants against placebo for the treatment of preschoolers (age ≤ 7 years) with ADHD. Change in ADHD symptom severity was the primary outcome (efficacy) and all‐cause dropout rates (acceptability) was the secondary outcome. Data were pooled with random‐effects models weighted by the inverse of the variance. Risk of bias of individual studies were assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool version 2. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022348597). Results Five RCTs (three methylphenidate immediate‐release, one methylphenidate extended‐release, and one lisdexamfetamine) were included. The analysis of efficacy was based on 489 participants. Meta‐analysis of change in ADHD symptom severity demonstrated a significant effect in favor of stimulants over placebo (standardized mean difference = −0.59; 95% CI −0.77, −0.41; p < 0.0001). There was no evidence of heterogeneity but some concerns about publication bias. Regardless, the confidence of evidence was considered moderate. For acceptability, stimulants did not lead to an increased rate of all‐cause discontinuation rates in comparison to placebo (OR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.15, 2.37; p = 0.45) but the confidence of estimate was very low. Conclusions Our findings demonstrated that stimulants are efficacious in reducing ADHD symptoms among preschool children. Clinicians should consider the use of stimulants when making treatment recommendations for preschoolers with ADHD.https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12146attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorderlisdexamfetaminemeta‐analysismethylphenidatepreschoolstimulants
spellingShingle Luisa S. Sugaya
Luis C. Farhat
Pietro Califano
Guilherme V. Polanczyk
Efficacy of stimulants for preschool attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
JCPP Advances
attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder
lisdexamfetamine
meta‐analysis
methylphenidate
preschool
stimulants
title Efficacy of stimulants for preschool attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Efficacy of stimulants for preschool attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy of stimulants for preschool attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of stimulants for preschool attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Efficacy of stimulants for preschool attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort efficacy of stimulants for preschool attention deficit hyperactivity disorder a systematic review and meta analysis
topic attention‐deficit hyperactivity disorder
lisdexamfetamine
meta‐analysis
methylphenidate
preschool
stimulants
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12146
work_keys_str_mv AT luisassugaya efficacyofstimulantsforpreschoolattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT luiscfarhat efficacyofstimulantsforpreschoolattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pietrocalifano efficacyofstimulantsforpreschoolattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guilhermevpolanczyk efficacyofstimulantsforpreschoolattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorderasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis