Human milk unmetabolized folic acid is increased following supplementation with synthetic folic acid as compared to (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid

Abstract Folic acid supplementation is recommended perinatally, but may increase unmetabolized folic acid (UMFA) in human milk; this is concerning as it is an inactive form which may be less bioavailable for the infant. “Natural” (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid [(6S)-5-MTHF] is available as an alt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kelsey M. Cochrane, Rajavel Elango, Angela M. Devlin, Jennifer A. Hutcheon, Crystal D. Karakochuk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2023-07-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38224-4
_version_ 1797778957887602688
author Kelsey M. Cochrane
Rajavel Elango
Angela M. Devlin
Jennifer A. Hutcheon
Crystal D. Karakochuk
author_facet Kelsey M. Cochrane
Rajavel Elango
Angela M. Devlin
Jennifer A. Hutcheon
Crystal D. Karakochuk
author_sort Kelsey M. Cochrane
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Folic acid supplementation is recommended perinatally, but may increase unmetabolized folic acid (UMFA) in human milk; this is concerning as it is an inactive form which may be less bioavailable for the infant. “Natural” (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid [(6S)-5-MTHF] is available as an alternative to folic acid, and may prevent the accumulation of UMFA in human milk. Pregnant women (n = 60) were enrolled at 8–21 weeks of gestation and randomized to 0.6 mg/day folic acid or (6S)-5-MTHF. At ~ 1-week postpartum, participants provided a human milk specimen. Total human milk folate (nmol/L) and concentrations of UMFA (nmol/L) were quantified via LC–MS/MS. Differences between groups were evaluated using multivariable quantile/linear regression, adjusting for dietary folate, weeks supplementing, and milk collection methods. No significant difference in total milk folate was found; however, the median milk UMFA concentration was 11 nmol/L higher in those receiving folic acid versus (6S)-5-MTHF (95% CI = 6.4–17 nmol/L), with UMFA representing 28% and 2% of total milk folate. In conclusion, the form of supplemental folate had markedly differential effects on the human milk folate profile, with folic acid increasing the mean proportion of milk UMFA by ~ 14-fold. Investigation of whether increased UMFA impacts folate-related metabolism and infant health outcomes is required.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T23:24:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-361cc5c370454cf9a33bc0ab4ed46d0a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T23:24:03Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-361cc5c370454cf9a33bc0ab4ed46d0a2023-07-16T11:13:48ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222023-07-011311910.1038/s41598-023-38224-4Human milk unmetabolized folic acid is increased following supplementation with synthetic folic acid as compared to (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acidKelsey M. Cochrane0Rajavel Elango1Angela M. Devlin2Jennifer A. Hutcheon3Crystal D. Karakochuk4Food, Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British ColumbiaBC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Healthy StartsBC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Healthy StartsBC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Healthy StartsFood, Nutrition and Health, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British ColumbiaAbstract Folic acid supplementation is recommended perinatally, but may increase unmetabolized folic acid (UMFA) in human milk; this is concerning as it is an inactive form which may be less bioavailable for the infant. “Natural” (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid [(6S)-5-MTHF] is available as an alternative to folic acid, and may prevent the accumulation of UMFA in human milk. Pregnant women (n = 60) were enrolled at 8–21 weeks of gestation and randomized to 0.6 mg/day folic acid or (6S)-5-MTHF. At ~ 1-week postpartum, participants provided a human milk specimen. Total human milk folate (nmol/L) and concentrations of UMFA (nmol/L) were quantified via LC–MS/MS. Differences between groups were evaluated using multivariable quantile/linear regression, adjusting for dietary folate, weeks supplementing, and milk collection methods. No significant difference in total milk folate was found; however, the median milk UMFA concentration was 11 nmol/L higher in those receiving folic acid versus (6S)-5-MTHF (95% CI = 6.4–17 nmol/L), with UMFA representing 28% and 2% of total milk folate. In conclusion, the form of supplemental folate had markedly differential effects on the human milk folate profile, with folic acid increasing the mean proportion of milk UMFA by ~ 14-fold. Investigation of whether increased UMFA impacts folate-related metabolism and infant health outcomes is required.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38224-4
spellingShingle Kelsey M. Cochrane
Rajavel Elango
Angela M. Devlin
Jennifer A. Hutcheon
Crystal D. Karakochuk
Human milk unmetabolized folic acid is increased following supplementation with synthetic folic acid as compared to (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid
Scientific Reports
title Human milk unmetabolized folic acid is increased following supplementation with synthetic folic acid as compared to (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid
title_full Human milk unmetabolized folic acid is increased following supplementation with synthetic folic acid as compared to (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid
title_fullStr Human milk unmetabolized folic acid is increased following supplementation with synthetic folic acid as compared to (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid
title_full_unstemmed Human milk unmetabolized folic acid is increased following supplementation with synthetic folic acid as compared to (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid
title_short Human milk unmetabolized folic acid is increased following supplementation with synthetic folic acid as compared to (6S)-5-methyltetrahydrofolic acid
title_sort human milk unmetabolized folic acid is increased following supplementation with synthetic folic acid as compared to 6s 5 methyltetrahydrofolic acid
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38224-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kelseymcochrane humanmilkunmetabolizedfolicacidisincreasedfollowingsupplementationwithsyntheticfolicacidascomparedto6s5methyltetrahydrofolicacid
AT rajavelelango humanmilkunmetabolizedfolicacidisincreasedfollowingsupplementationwithsyntheticfolicacidascomparedto6s5methyltetrahydrofolicacid
AT angelamdevlin humanmilkunmetabolizedfolicacidisincreasedfollowingsupplementationwithsyntheticfolicacidascomparedto6s5methyltetrahydrofolicacid
AT jenniferahutcheon humanmilkunmetabolizedfolicacidisincreasedfollowingsupplementationwithsyntheticfolicacidascomparedto6s5methyltetrahydrofolicacid
AT crystaldkarakochuk humanmilkunmetabolizedfolicacidisincreasedfollowingsupplementationwithsyntheticfolicacidascomparedto6s5methyltetrahydrofolicacid