The Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in an Exposed Human Population Is Biased by the Immunoassay Used: Implications in Serosurveillance

The presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was examined over 7 months in a population of essential service workers exposed during the first epidemic wave in Madrid (Spain). Results obtained with different serological assays were compared. Firstly, serum samples obtained in April 2020 were analyzed using...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francisco Llorente, Elisa Pérez-Ramírez, Mayte Pérez-Olmeda, Desirée Dafouz-Bustos, Jovita Fernández-Pinero, Mercedes Martínez-Cortés, Miguel Ángel Jiménez-Clavero
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-11-01
Series:Pathogens
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/12/11/1360
_version_ 1827639040138018816
author Francisco Llorente
Elisa Pérez-Ramírez
Mayte Pérez-Olmeda
Desirée Dafouz-Bustos
Jovita Fernández-Pinero
Mercedes Martínez-Cortés
Miguel Ángel Jiménez-Clavero
author_facet Francisco Llorente
Elisa Pérez-Ramírez
Mayte Pérez-Olmeda
Desirée Dafouz-Bustos
Jovita Fernández-Pinero
Mercedes Martínez-Cortés
Miguel Ángel Jiménez-Clavero
author_sort Francisco Llorente
collection DOAJ
description The presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was examined over 7 months in a population of essential service workers exposed during the first epidemic wave in Madrid (Spain). Results obtained with different serological assays were compared. Firstly, serum samples obtained in April 2020 were analyzed using eleven SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection methods, including seven ELISAs, two CLIAs and two LFAs. While all of the ELISA tests and the Roche eCLIA method showed good performance, it was poorer for the Abbott CLIA and LFA tests. Sera from 115 workers with serologically positive results in April were collected 2 and 7 months after the first sampling and were analyzed using five of the tests previously assessed. The results showed that while some ELISA tests consistently detected the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies even 7 months after first detection, other methods, such as the Abbott CLIA test, showed an important reduction in sensitivity for these mature antibodies. The sensitivity increased after establishing new cut-off values, calculated taking into account both recent and old infections, suggesting that an adjustment of assay parameters may improve the detection of individuals exposed to the infection.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T16:32:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-3630884fcc41449c9072bbc00484be62
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-0817
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T16:32:07Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pathogens
spelling doaj.art-3630884fcc41449c9072bbc00484be622023-11-24T14:59:54ZengMDPI AGPathogens2076-08172023-11-011211136010.3390/pathogens12111360The Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in an Exposed Human Population Is Biased by the Immunoassay Used: Implications in SerosurveillanceFrancisco Llorente0Elisa Pérez-Ramírez1Mayte Pérez-Olmeda2Desirée Dafouz-Bustos3Jovita Fernández-Pinero4Mercedes Martínez-Cortés5Miguel Ángel Jiménez-Clavero6Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA-INIA), CSIC, Valdeolmos, 28130 Madrid, SpainCentro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA-INIA), CSIC, Valdeolmos, 28130 Madrid, SpainCentro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Majadahonda, SpainCentro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA-INIA), CSIC, Valdeolmos, 28130 Madrid, SpainCentro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA-INIA), CSIC, Valdeolmos, 28130 Madrid, SpainMadrid Salud, Madrid City Council, 28007 Madrid, SpainCentro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA-INIA), CSIC, Valdeolmos, 28130 Madrid, SpainThe presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was examined over 7 months in a population of essential service workers exposed during the first epidemic wave in Madrid (Spain). Results obtained with different serological assays were compared. Firstly, serum samples obtained in April 2020 were analyzed using eleven SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection methods, including seven ELISAs, two CLIAs and two LFAs. While all of the ELISA tests and the Roche eCLIA method showed good performance, it was poorer for the Abbott CLIA and LFA tests. Sera from 115 workers with serologically positive results in April were collected 2 and 7 months after the first sampling and were analyzed using five of the tests previously assessed. The results showed that while some ELISA tests consistently detected the presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies even 7 months after first detection, other methods, such as the Abbott CLIA test, showed an important reduction in sensitivity for these mature antibodies. The sensitivity increased after establishing new cut-off values, calculated taking into account both recent and old infections, suggesting that an adjustment of assay parameters may improve the detection of individuals exposed to the infection.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/12/11/1360COVID-19SARS-CoV-2serologic assaysELISACLIALFA
spellingShingle Francisco Llorente
Elisa Pérez-Ramírez
Mayte Pérez-Olmeda
Desirée Dafouz-Bustos
Jovita Fernández-Pinero
Mercedes Martínez-Cortés
Miguel Ángel Jiménez-Clavero
The Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in an Exposed Human Population Is Biased by the Immunoassay Used: Implications in Serosurveillance
Pathogens
COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
serologic assays
ELISA
CLIA
LFA
title The Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in an Exposed Human Population Is Biased by the Immunoassay Used: Implications in Serosurveillance
title_full The Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in an Exposed Human Population Is Biased by the Immunoassay Used: Implications in Serosurveillance
title_fullStr The Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in an Exposed Human Population Is Biased by the Immunoassay Used: Implications in Serosurveillance
title_full_unstemmed The Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in an Exposed Human Population Is Biased by the Immunoassay Used: Implications in Serosurveillance
title_short The Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in an Exposed Human Population Is Biased by the Immunoassay Used: Implications in Serosurveillance
title_sort detection of sars cov 2 antibodies in an exposed human population is biased by the immunoassay used implications in serosurveillance
topic COVID-19
SARS-CoV-2
serologic assays
ELISA
CLIA
LFA
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0817/12/11/1360
work_keys_str_mv AT franciscollorente thedetectionofsarscov2antibodiesinanexposedhumanpopulationisbiasedbytheimmunoassayusedimplicationsinserosurveillance
AT elisaperezramirez thedetectionofsarscov2antibodiesinanexposedhumanpopulationisbiasedbytheimmunoassayusedimplicationsinserosurveillance
AT mayteperezolmeda thedetectionofsarscov2antibodiesinanexposedhumanpopulationisbiasedbytheimmunoassayusedimplicationsinserosurveillance
AT desireedafouzbustos thedetectionofsarscov2antibodiesinanexposedhumanpopulationisbiasedbytheimmunoassayusedimplicationsinserosurveillance
AT jovitafernandezpinero thedetectionofsarscov2antibodiesinanexposedhumanpopulationisbiasedbytheimmunoassayusedimplicationsinserosurveillance
AT mercedesmartinezcortes thedetectionofsarscov2antibodiesinanexposedhumanpopulationisbiasedbytheimmunoassayusedimplicationsinserosurveillance
AT miguelangeljimenezclavero thedetectionofsarscov2antibodiesinanexposedhumanpopulationisbiasedbytheimmunoassayusedimplicationsinserosurveillance
AT franciscollorente detectionofsarscov2antibodiesinanexposedhumanpopulationisbiasedbytheimmunoassayusedimplicationsinserosurveillance
AT elisaperezramirez detectionofsarscov2antibodiesinanexposedhumanpopulationisbiasedbytheimmunoassayusedimplicationsinserosurveillance
AT mayteperezolmeda detectionofsarscov2antibodiesinanexposedhumanpopulationisbiasedbytheimmunoassayusedimplicationsinserosurveillance
AT desireedafouzbustos detectionofsarscov2antibodiesinanexposedhumanpopulationisbiasedbytheimmunoassayusedimplicationsinserosurveillance
AT jovitafernandezpinero detectionofsarscov2antibodiesinanexposedhumanpopulationisbiasedbytheimmunoassayusedimplicationsinserosurveillance
AT mercedesmartinezcortes detectionofsarscov2antibodiesinanexposedhumanpopulationisbiasedbytheimmunoassayusedimplicationsinserosurveillance
AT miguelangeljimenezclavero detectionofsarscov2antibodiesinanexposedhumanpopulationisbiasedbytheimmunoassayusedimplicationsinserosurveillance