North American International Responsibility in the trade jurisdiction of the world trade organization from the wto-osc / ds267 - upland cotton case
This paper discusses the international responsibility of the State and the role of international jurisdictions – specifically analyzing the international responsibility of the United States in the commercial jurisdiction of the World Trade Organization, utilizing the WTO-OSC/DS267, known as the Upla...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Londrina
2019-03-01
|
| Series: | Scientia Iuris |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/iuris/article/view/33768 |
| Summary: | This paper discusses the international responsibility of the State and the
role of international jurisdictions – specifically analyzing the international
responsibility of the United States in the commercial jurisdiction of the World Trade
Organization, utilizing the WTO-OSC/DS267, known as the Upland Cotton case. For
the State, it is inevitable that there will always be conflicts of interest subject to
internationally recognized trade rules. This leads to a situation where international
organizations need to implement a harmonization mechanism using decisions based
on the regulation of international trade. Moreover, a State has the obligation to repair
damage caused by disrespecting principles of Public International Law. Furthermore,
general principles of international law apply to the WTO and its agreements. In this
sense, the relationship of international responsibility in the WTO Dispute Settlement
System (SSC) transcends party involvement in disputes as it concerns all the WTO
members.
This paper discusses the international responsibility of the State and the
role of international jurisdictions – specifically analyzing the international
responsibility of the United States in the commercial jurisdiction of the World Trade
Organization, utilizing the WTO-OSC/DS267, known as the Upland Cotton case. For
the State, it is inevitable that there will always be conflicts of interest subject to
internationally recognized trade rules. This leads to a situation where international
organizations need to implement a harmonization mechanism using decisions based
on the regulation of international trade. Moreover, a State has the obligation to repair
damage caused by disrespecting principles of Public International Law. Furthermore,
general principles of international law apply to the WTO and its agreements. In this
sense, the relationship of international responsibility in the WTO Dispute Settlement
System (SSC) transcends party involvement in disputes as it concerns all the WTO
members |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1415-6490 2178-8189 |