Benchmarking the nutrition-related commitments and practices of major Belgian food companies

Abstract Background To benchmark and quantitatively assess the transparency, specificity and comprehensiveness of nutrition-related commitments, as well as related practices of the largest Belgian food companies. Methods The ‘Business Impact Assessment on Obesity and population-level nutrition’ (BIA...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iris Van Dam, Naomi Reimes, Stefanie Vandevijvere
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-04-01
Series:International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01269-1
_version_ 1811272555116363776
author Iris Van Dam
Naomi Reimes
Stefanie Vandevijvere
author_facet Iris Van Dam
Naomi Reimes
Stefanie Vandevijvere
author_sort Iris Van Dam
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background To benchmark and quantitatively assess the transparency, specificity and comprehensiveness of nutrition-related commitments, as well as related practices of the largest Belgian food companies. Methods The ‘Business Impact Assessment on Obesity and population-level nutrition’ (BIA-Obesity) was applied to evaluate nutrition-related commitments and practices concerning product formulation, labelling, promotion and accessibility by the biggest Belgian food and non-alcoholic beverage manufacturers (n = 19), supermarkets (n = 5) and quick-service restaurants (n = 7). Publicly available commitments were collected and company representatives given the opportunity to verify and complete the information (2019–2020). Commitments were scored according to the BIA-Obesity. To assess company practices, the following indicators were calculated: median Nutri-Score of product portfolios, the proportion of products not-permitted to be marketed to children (using the World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe nutrient profile model), the proportion of ultra-processed food products (using the NOVA-classification) and the proportion of products displaying Nutri-Score on the front-of-pack. Promotions in supermarket flyers were analysed over a one-year period and quick-service restaurant density around schools was calculated. Correlations between commitments and performance indicators were calculated applying the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Results Eighteen out of 31 companies participated (56%). Overall BIA-Obesity scores for commitments ranged from 2 to 75% (median = 35%) with notable variation across policy domains and food industries. The proportion of portfolios consisting of A and B Nutri-Score products ranged from 0 to 100% (median = 29%). The median proportion of products not-permitted to be marketed to children was 81% (range = 12%-100%) and the median proportion of ultra-processed foods was 75% (range = 2%-100%) across product portfolios. No significant correlations were observed between the strength of commitments and related performance indicators. Conclusion Food industry actions do not meet recommended best practices. Performance indicators show large potential for improvement across policy domains and industries. Government regulations are urgently needed to improve food industry efforts and ensure that commitments translate into improved practices.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T22:42:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-363c8fad120b47eb90e53a2de495d34a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1479-5868
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T22:42:25Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
spelling doaj.art-363c8fad120b47eb90e53a2de495d34a2022-12-22T03:13:39ZengBMCInternational Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity1479-58682022-04-0119111310.1186/s12966-022-01269-1Benchmarking the nutrition-related commitments and practices of major Belgian food companiesIris Van Dam0Naomi Reimes1Stefanie Vandevijvere2Sciensano, Service of Lifestyle and Chronic DiseasesRijksinstituut Voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM)Sciensano, Service of Lifestyle and Chronic DiseasesAbstract Background To benchmark and quantitatively assess the transparency, specificity and comprehensiveness of nutrition-related commitments, as well as related practices of the largest Belgian food companies. Methods The ‘Business Impact Assessment on Obesity and population-level nutrition’ (BIA-Obesity) was applied to evaluate nutrition-related commitments and practices concerning product formulation, labelling, promotion and accessibility by the biggest Belgian food and non-alcoholic beverage manufacturers (n = 19), supermarkets (n = 5) and quick-service restaurants (n = 7). Publicly available commitments were collected and company representatives given the opportunity to verify and complete the information (2019–2020). Commitments were scored according to the BIA-Obesity. To assess company practices, the following indicators were calculated: median Nutri-Score of product portfolios, the proportion of products not-permitted to be marketed to children (using the World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe nutrient profile model), the proportion of ultra-processed food products (using the NOVA-classification) and the proportion of products displaying Nutri-Score on the front-of-pack. Promotions in supermarket flyers were analysed over a one-year period and quick-service restaurant density around schools was calculated. Correlations between commitments and performance indicators were calculated applying the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Results Eighteen out of 31 companies participated (56%). Overall BIA-Obesity scores for commitments ranged from 2 to 75% (median = 35%) with notable variation across policy domains and food industries. The proportion of portfolios consisting of A and B Nutri-Score products ranged from 0 to 100% (median = 29%). The median proportion of products not-permitted to be marketed to children was 81% (range = 12%-100%) and the median proportion of ultra-processed foods was 75% (range = 2%-100%) across product portfolios. No significant correlations were observed between the strength of commitments and related performance indicators. Conclusion Food industry actions do not meet recommended best practices. Performance indicators show large potential for improvement across policy domains and industries. Government regulations are urgently needed to improve food industry efforts and ensure that commitments translate into improved practices.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01269-1Business impact assessmentFood industryNutritional qualityFood supplyNutrient profileAccountability
spellingShingle Iris Van Dam
Naomi Reimes
Stefanie Vandevijvere
Benchmarking the nutrition-related commitments and practices of major Belgian food companies
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Business impact assessment
Food industry
Nutritional quality
Food supply
Nutrient profile
Accountability
title Benchmarking the nutrition-related commitments and practices of major Belgian food companies
title_full Benchmarking the nutrition-related commitments and practices of major Belgian food companies
title_fullStr Benchmarking the nutrition-related commitments and practices of major Belgian food companies
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking the nutrition-related commitments and practices of major Belgian food companies
title_short Benchmarking the nutrition-related commitments and practices of major Belgian food companies
title_sort benchmarking the nutrition related commitments and practices of major belgian food companies
topic Business impact assessment
Food industry
Nutritional quality
Food supply
Nutrient profile
Accountability
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-022-01269-1
work_keys_str_mv AT irisvandam benchmarkingthenutritionrelatedcommitmentsandpracticesofmajorbelgianfoodcompanies
AT naomireimes benchmarkingthenutritionrelatedcommitmentsandpracticesofmajorbelgianfoodcompanies
AT stefanievandevijvere benchmarkingthenutritionrelatedcommitmentsandpracticesofmajorbelgianfoodcompanies